Bipole rear
SangYuP said:
Thanks for all your help. I decided on the Athena AS-F2. I actually had my mind set on the Athena, but I found the JBLs for only $300 shipped so I just wanted everyone's opinion on it. I just ordered the Athena AS-F2 so I should be getting it in about a week.
One more thing. I currently own a 6.1 receiver, the Onkyo TX-SR502. I will be using the Athena AS-C1 for center, AS-F2 for front L/R, AS-B2 for my L/R surround, and I ordered the AS-R1 for my rear center surround. Was that a mistake to use a bi-pole speaker for my center surround? Should I have used another AS-B2 for my rear center surround? It was a impluse buy and I didn't do much research. Thank you.
THX recomends dipole speakers for the left and right surrounds and 2 direct radiators (like the AS-B2) for the rears.
Many people (myself included) seem to prefer bipoles like the AS-R2 to dipoles and some even like direct radiators all around. I've even seen some posts by people who insist on using the exact same speaker all around with seperate subs for the front and rear.
I have recently gone from 4 matched bipole surrounds to bipole left and right with direct radiating rears. What I've found is:
1. They do sound different.
2. Music is better with the direct rears.
3. For HT the directs seem to call more attention to themselves. (I turn them down 2db to aleviate this.)
4. The rear speakers are the least important ones in your set.
What I'd recomend you do is try the AS-R2 and see how you like it. It's possible that since you're only using one speaker in the back the bipole will do a better job than a direct radiator. (The reason THX recomends two speakers is that it takes two slightly different rear sound sources to "fix" the sound to the rear. The bipole just might accomplish this with one speaker.) If it doesn't suit you can always buy a second AS-R2 and switch the sides with the rears.