AFAIK, photos of equipment for sale are intended to show possession and actual condition of merchandise. Using someone else's photo could indicate either that there is a scam in play or that the equipment the seller has is damaged in some way and is trying to hide that fact by using photos or pristine equipment.
I don't think this falls under the intellectual property category unless the pic is copyrighted or watermarked. Would fair use be an appropriate term for a pic that just gets thrown on the net without some legal statement of ownership?
Exacta mundo. If I am buying a piece of equipment that is a used good (even if slightly used) I want a picture. A picture of what I am actually getting.
I almost got burned on a PSB setup. They guy used a different set of pics and had a friend with a good Ebay rating sell them. I got them and everything was packed in-adequately. There were a few burned drivers. The subs were blown. The CD changer and receiver wrecked.
I felt sorry for the poor girl that sold these for him. I got my money back, and they never shipped a shipping tag to pick them up.
I have buddy that is a PSB dealer. Got the driver and tweets at cost, picked up a replacement 10" SVC woofer at Parts Express and sold the setup to a buddy at cost (~$300). Never will get my time and frustration back.
