<font color='#000000'>Ricahrd,
I agree, and you could drive yourself crazy with all the options. That's why I honed in the the ability of the Yamaha receiver to drive your B&W speaker option.
There have been a great many discussions about the relative performance and value of receivers vs separates in this forum. If you do a search you will probably find some entertaining reading.
Let me preface this by saying I think Krell makes good equipment, but it's way overpriced for what you get. If they sold it by the pound they could probably justify their prices, but on performance alone, no.
In your case, you were told that the 1400 could not drive the 7NTs. That's absolutely untrue. There are four main factors to consider here, RMS power, dynamic power, speaker efficiency and speaker impedance (more on this last one later).
A receiver with 110W per channel is more than sufficient for most home entertainment setups. All the speakers have a nominal impedance of 8 ohms and are rated with the same sensitivity (efficiency). At 4 Ohms they would be harder to drive, it would take about twice the power.
The more complicated part is how an amplifier handles transients (rapid peaks in the audio signal) and dynamic loads (changes in the speaker impedance vs frequency due to driver and crossover characteristics). If an amplifer has a beefy enough power supply, with enough current to supply the output, the above two issues should not be a problem. Similarly the output stage must be able to deliver the available power (low impedance, i.e high damping, high slew factor etc. we won't go there).
The final aspect is the dynamic impedance of the speakers in question and to what degree they will provide a difficult load for the amplifier. Here's the funny part. According to B&W's own web site, the 603 S3s ( or 604 S3s) dip down to 3 Ohms while the 7NTs dip down to only 4.6 Ohms minimum. Thus this should make the 7NTs a more consistent and easier speaker to drive.
I wonder what the vendor would have to say about that?</font>