AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Well, you guys know the Klipsch KL650-THX measures +/-1.0dB on listening window FR (verified by both Audioholics and Home Theater Magazine) + smooth off-axis and THX-Ultra certified w/ high efficiency and tremendous output capability. It's a passive design. I don't see any active speakers being flatter than that. And I don't see too many people running to buy it either. :D
 
R

Ricardojoa

Audioholic
If you were building a xover from scratch and wanted to experiment, and have your results listenable quickly, then doing it with DSP hardware and separate amps would be the answer, but building for manufacturing wouldn't work that way. It's great for experiments, but for mass-production, if you can whip out a crossover with a hand-full of passive parts inside the box, that's cheaper and more controlled than the active way. The DSP device you need to experiment this way would be fairly expensive, though, or would be a stack of cheaper units. And, some of the control software for cheaper DSP devices isn't conducive to optimizing a crossover, more of a sound system EQ tool. Don't forget, if you're starting from scratch with this, you need good analysis tools too.
Well i wont building anything. I thinkg the OP was refering wether the SS could be easily switched from passive to active. In that case it wont, and of course if someone wanted the SS to be active, then he would have to inquire Jim about that. This would mean a whole new plan and discussion given if Jim is willing to build one.
 
R

Ricardojoa

Audioholic
Well, no Raal, no accuton, no berrylium tweeter, no open back midrange, thats why.:D
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top