I'm looking to finally get myself a flat HD tv with all the bells and whistles. Due to money/apt size, I've decided on a 32".
I'm torn bt the
Westinghouse LTV-32w6 and the
Samsung LN-S3251D. I'm torn due to cost vs. benefits. I've read all the glowing reviews on the Samsung, but in looking at the Westy, thought the picture held its own. The major difference is the Samsung has a 4000:1 contrast ratio while the Westy is down at 1000:1. Oh, and 2 HDMI inputs on the Sam vs 1 on the West. Anyway, I'm a cheap s.o.b. and am leaning towards the Westinghouse b/c a) I won't need/utilize 2 HDMI inputs...may not even use 1 and b) it's ~$400 cheaper. Again...I'm cheap. Well, not cheap really, just on a budget.
So I was wondering if the Samsung is beyond question better, enough so to justify $400 additional dollars. OR, is the Westinghouse so close in performance as to negate the need to spend $400 more? Just wondering thoughts. I'd spend for the Samsung if it clearly outclassed the Westy, but to my eyes, it's not an enormous difference. Well, let me be clear– the picture is better on the Samsung, no doubt. But I don't know if it's $400 better. If the Westy is up to task, my wallet would thank me, particularly with the holidays around the corner. Thanks for any input.