This is just a general question for anyone. Why do newer receivers offer the option to Bi-amp your speakers using 2 of the receiver's internal amps, and state in the manual that you will hear an improvement in the sound quality, when a lot of people think there is no benefit?? Is there anyone out there who who uses this feature and does here an improvement in sound??
IMHO, the receivers that offer bi-amping do it mostly because they can, and it looks like a cool feature to many consumers.
There are arguments for why passive bi-amping can provide benefits, but the problem is that most people don't experience these conditions with most home speaker systems, hence all of the warnings that passive bi-amping doesn't make a difference.
For example, if you have a speaker system with a crossover that allows the woofers to be powered separately from midrange and HF drivers it is possible that the lowest frequencies, on some material, could be clipping the amp, and therefore degrading the sound coming through the midrange and HF drivers. I've seen it argued that the lower relative power of receiver amp channels makes this more likely. It strikes me as not impossible, and if you had inefficient speakers that could play very loud, well, I suppose there could be a benefit to passive bi-amping. I'd guess the most likely way for this to occur is if you're applying equalization to boost the bass frequencies. Are you?
Then there's the argument that for some speaker systems with multiple large woofers, or systems that present complex loads to an amp (like phase angles that become capacitive at certain frequencies in combination with low impedance and relative inefficiency) that giving the different sections of each speaker a separate power amplifier results in better sound, due to less stress in some way on the amps. Designs with multiple large woofers, for example, can present the amp with "back EMF", which some think can theoretically negatively impact amplifier performance. (I've never seen measurements that prove this.) These are other "maybe" categories, but do they describe your speakers? Just because a speaker has a lot of drivers doesn't necessarily make it a complex load. On my 1st generation Legacy Audio Focus speakers (ca 1996) I was convinced I got an audible benefit from passive bi-amping, but that was a really weird design that presented a very unusual load on the amps, and they could play very loud, but even Legacy doesn't build them like that anymore. As a counter example, my current six driver per channel Revel speakers don't seem to benefit at all from passive bi-amping.
So the advice that passive bi-amping is useless may be an overstatement, but I think it is a very slight one, if it is.