For Stereo Listening, Whats wrong with Active Monitors

G

gajraaj

Enthusiast
Guys, sorry for my uneducated question, please enlighten me.

I want to build a simple but pleasant stereo systems, mostly to listen from my apple iPod.

I have been thinking of buy a decent pair of active monitors (Genelec 8020A / KRK RP6 G2 or similar) and hooking them up with the universal dock of the iPod.

I found this arrangement to be simple, purist and cheap (theoretically).


What am I missing here? Are there strong reason / viable alternatives to move to an Amp + passive speaker arrangement?

i am working with a small budget of $500-600.

thanks.
 
djreef

djreef

Audioholic Chief
For Stereo Listening, Whats wrong with Active Monitors



Absolutely nothing. I'm perfectly happy with mine, but understand most active systems don't hide anything. Mine is brutally honest, almost to a fault.

DJ
 
Last edited:
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
Nothing, as long as the implied inflexibility of the system doesn't bother you and you actually like the sound of your chosen active monitors. I suggest you listen carefully before marrying them. Remember, they were designed to do a job, not necessarially for long-term easy listening.
 
djreef

djreef

Audioholic Chief
Nothing, as long as the implied inflexibility of the system doesn't bother you and you actually like the sound of your chosen active monitors. I suggest you listen carefully before marrying them. Remember, they were designed to do a job, not necessarially for long-term easy listening.
Absolutely, I listened to about 8 different monitors before I decided to pony up for the Dynaudios. Equipment matching is critical.

DJ
 
B

Boerd

Full Audioholic
Guys, sorry for my uneducated question, please enlighten me.

I want to build a simple but pleasant stereo systems, mostly to listen from my apple iPod.

I have been thinking of buy a decent pair of active monitors (Genelec 8020A / KRK RP6 G2 or similar) and hooking them up with the universal dock of the iPod.

I found this arrangement to be simple, purist and cheap (theoretically).


What am I missing here? Are there strong reason / viable alternatives to move to an Amp + passive speaker arrangement?

i am working with a small budget of $500-600.

thanks.
Actually active speakers tend to sound better - you're not losing anything. I own an active system and I love it.
In the end is all about enjoying the music and NOT about all the neurosis that comes with 10k$ speakers and so on. If it sounds good to you then 5-600$ budget is enough.
Just kick back and enjoy your music and if you ever get more money to spend then buy beer (or wine) and music - don't get into UPGRADATIS. :):):)
 
G

gajraaj

Enthusiast
Thanks guys for your inputs. I think I am quite convinced that there is no harm in going the active speaker route.

The next question that hits me is - Which speakers?

I live in Brussels, Belgium and there are not may big studios / demo rooms around where you can audition the monitors. Infact, I am yet to find even 1. There are some in London and Amsterdam.

What I gather from you guys is that its a strict NO NO to buy the speakers without listening to them.

Do you think there are any monitors that can be bought just on reputation?
 
B

Boerd

Full Audioholic
Thanks guys for your inputs. I think I am quite convinced that there is no harm in going the active speaker route.

The next question that hits me is - Which speakers?

I live in Brussels, Belgium and there are not may big studios / demo rooms around where you can audition the monitors. Infact, I am yet to find even 1. There are some in London and Amsterdam.

What I gather from you guys is that its a strict NO NO to buy the speakers without listening to them.

Do you think there are any monitors that can be bought just on reputation?

Here is what I would buy for your budget: NHT Pro M-00 active monitors:
http://store.nhthifi.com/NHT-M-00-230V?sc=12&category=1213

Do you think there are any monitors that can be bought just on reputation?
It is all up to you - just do not look back; once you bought something enjoy your music and don't start upgrading your stuff - money are better spent on beer :)
Personally I bought my current system without listening to it - it had a 30 days money back guarantee and I like them A LOT. Nothing like active speakers.
 
lsiberian

lsiberian

Audioholic Overlord
Without an chamber test and significant experience it is difficult to select a good speaker. Most reputable brands will produce good monitors, but I suggest you get passive monitors with a powered mixer or amp instead. The Behringer 2031p's are known to be very good and happen to be a European brand so likely will be available.
 
G

gajraaj

Enthusiast
BOERD, Thanks for your inputs. I would try to find if there is a dealer in/around Brussels.

lsiberian, I did some research on Behringers. I see mixed feedback. Some say they are just crap others swear by them.

Its quite confusing out there.
 
davidtwotrees

davidtwotrees

Audioholic General
I've been looking at monitors, too. Active and otherwise. I've read some good things about Quad's monitors.........the 11L and 12L. Here is a very reasonable pair on AudiogonI wasn't aware Paradigm makes an active monitor, Here
I've also seen the Nht Xd set up and it looks hot, though out of the op's price range.............
TLS guy swears that active is the wave of the future. I tend to agree. Are these standard amps, or are they ICE amps in these things?
 
B

Boerd

Full Audioholic
I've been looking at monitors, too. Active and otherwise. I've read some good things about Quad's monitors.........the 11L and 12L. Here is a very reasonable pair on AudiogonI wasn't aware Paradigm makes an active monitor, Here
I've also seen the Nht Xd set up and it looks hot, though out of the op's price range.............
TLS guy swears that active is the wave of the future. I tend to agree. Are these standard amps, or are they ICE amps in these things?
I will have to say these QUAD speakers are fantastic; I had the chance to listen to a pair of these (may have been the 12L modell) and they sound really good.
Quad has a very very good reputation.
 
Last edited:
djreef

djreef

Audioholic Chief
In addition to the Active 20's, Paradigm also had an Active 40 (which had 2 midbass drivers) which was hot stuff about 15 years ago. These were what really got me intrigued by active monitors. Unfortunately, Paradigm bailed out of that market for some odd reason. From what I remembered the stores couldn't keep them in stock. :confused:

DJ
 
G

gajraaj

Enthusiast
Guys, thanks for the help.

My questions?

QUAD - Are these active speakers. I browsed through their site and found that these are passive speakers. (hope i did not mess it up)

PARADIGM - They look good but way beyond my budget. Max I can stretch is $750. A dollar more and my wife will cut me into half to make 2 floor standers. :):)
 
davidtwotrees

davidtwotrees

Audioholic General
The link I gave in my post #11 takes you to an online auction at the Audiogon site for a pair of Quad 11L Active speakers in gloss piano black for $475 US plus shipping.
 
lsiberian

lsiberian

Audioholic Overlord
BOERD, Thanks for your inputs. I would try to find if there is a dealer in/around Brussels.

lsiberian, I did some research on Behringers. I see mixed feedback. Some say they are just crap others swear by them.

Its quite confusing out there.
I assure you they aren't crap. People bash them for their brand name. The build quality is excellent and is rarely matched at that price point. ;)

Of course if you go up in price you'll find higher quality stuff, but these are widely loved on this forum and have excellent quality.

I still prefer building my own speakers though. There is something primal about building my own speakers.

Don't get the active ones though. They have bad amps.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Found this as I was googling the Quad reviews..........
active vs passive

The Quads look hot hot hot.
David, thanks for that link. I have I think made all those points about this issue in my posts over the years.

I would first reiterate, the author's admonition, that tearing out the passive crossover from a speaker, and replacing it with an active crossover is not a simple problem. There are increasing number of members who think it is. As the author points out if is a difficult and complex problem.

In addition I would add the following, and most of these points are eluded to by the author, however he glossed over my first point.

In an analog filter, whether active or passive, the phase shifts and time delays will still be dependent on order. So both passive and active fourth order filters will turn a square wave into a sine wave. I know WmAx is going tell me that is of no consequence, but a defect as gross as that has to be of significant consequence. I know it is an issue and but almost impossible to AB, as changing filter orders changes the whole balance of a speaker, and using different drivers is confounding.

In the past active speakers have by necessity been expensive. However we now seem to be able to produce large numbers of amps in receivers at very modest cost.

Making a decent passive crossover is costly to manufacture. At the price point of speakers talked about most often on these forums, they have to have dreadful quality crossover parts. The cost of good crossover parts alone, would exceed the total cost of many speakers talked about here.

I believe therefore that active speakers could be produced competitively.

However as home theater increases in complexity, it gets into the hands of fewer and fewer large manufacturers. Large corporations have zero imagination, and slavishly follow the familiar well traveled road.

In my view adding increasing processing power and increasing numbers of amps to receivers is a flawed engineering concept certain to end in grief. I counsel anyone against the purchase of such a devices.

Obviously if pre pros were a high demand item, they could be produced for half the coat at least of a receiver, may be less.

So that would give you a good leg up on the production of active speakers, especially with the savings from the elimination of the passive crossover as well.

The next issue is R & D. There really is advantage in having steep crossover slopes quite often. The problem is high order slopes, with the phase shifts and time delays, make the speakers sound somewhat slugged to me.

So far perfect phase digital crossovers have been the preserve of a small Australian company DEQX.

What is required is some deeper pockets to run with this ball.

What I would envision is speakers powered by small class A amps for the tweeters, a class AB amp preferably a current dumper for the mid or bass mid, and a class D for the bass if a three way or two and a half way. May be class D is already good enough for the lower two, I don't know.

Then if it was all put together with zero phase digital crossovers you would really have something.

We badly need someone of Peter Walker's drive for innovation for this. I know that if he was still with us he would be there already. As it is he did the spade work for the active Quad's talked about here. He engineered the powering of the legendary BBC active TLs.

Doing this right is a tall order for the home constructor. To be practical for most you need a supply of suitable amps in board form. Heat sinks and casings have to be fashioned. Building the crossover is not bad, and there are design programs for active filters now, well within reach of the home constructor. For that reason for the home constructor the amps and crossovers are remote from the speakers, which makes for a "busy" complex installation.

I just wish audio and home theater enthusiasts would wake up and realize how short changed they are by the current state of play. I think any manufacturer willing to "Go Rogue" would reap the rewards.

May be threads like this will help to educate.

One more thought, always run speaker wire in conduit, not just in wall. I hope you will not need those speaker wires much longer, but balanced audio or optical cables instead!
 
djreef

djreef

Audioholic Chief
David, thanks for that link. I have I think made all those points about this issue in my posts over the years.

I would first reiterate, the author's admonition, that tearing out the passive crossover from a speaker, and replacing it with an active crossover is not a simple problem. There are increasing number of members who think it is. As the author points out if is a difficult and complex problem.

In addition I would add the following, and most of these points are eluded to by the author, however he glossed over my first point.

In an analog filter, whether active or passive, the phase shifts and time delays will still be dependent on order. So both passive and active fourth order filters will turn a square wave into a sine wave. I know WmAx is going tell me that is of no consequence, but a defect as gross as that has to be of significant consequence. I know it is an issue and but almost impossible to AB, as changing filter orders changes the whole balance of a speaker, and using different drivers is confounding.

In the past active speakers have by necessity been expensive. However we now seem to be able to produce large numbers of amps in receivers at very modest cost.

Making a decent passive crossover is costly to manufacture. At the price point of speakers talked about most often on these forums, they have to have dreadful quality crossover parts. The cost of good crossover parts alone, would exceed the total cost of many speakers talked about here.

I believe therefore that active speakers could be produced competitively.

However as home theater increases in complexity, it gets into the hands of fewer and fewer large manufacturers. Large corporations have zero imagination, and slavishly follow the familiar well traveled road.

In my view adding increasing processing power and increasing numbers of amps to receivers is a flawed engineering concept certain to end in grief. I counsel anyone against the purchase of such a devices.

Obviously if pre pros were a high demand item, they could be produced for half the coat at least of a receiver, may be less.

So that would give you a good leg up on the production of active speakers, especially with the savings from the elimination of the passive crossover as well.

The next issue is R & D. There really is advantage in having steep crossover slopes quite often. The problem is high order slopes, with the phase shifts and time delays, make the speakers sound somewhat slugged to me.

So far perfect phase digital crossovers have been the preserve of a small Australian company DEQX.

What is required is some deeper pockets to run with this ball.

What I would envision is speakers powered by small class A amps for the tweeters, a class AB amp preferably a current dumper for the mid or bass mid, and a class D for the bass if a three way or two and a half way. May be class D is already good enough for the lower two, I don't know.

Then if it was all put together with zero phase digital crossovers you would really have something.

We badly need someone of Peter Walker's drive for innovation for this. I know that if he was still with us he would be there already. As it is he did the spade work for the active Quad's talked about here. He engineered the powering of the legendary BBC active TLs.

Doing this right is a tall order for the home constructor. To be practical for most you need a supply of suitable amps in board form. Heat sinks and casings have to be fashioned. Building the crossover is not bad, and there are design programs for active filters now, well within reach of the home constructor. For that reason for the home constructor the amps and crossovers are remote from the speakers, which makes for a "busy" complex installation.

I just wish audio and home theater enthusiasts would wake up and realize how short changed they are by the current state of play. I think any manufacturer willing to "Go Rogue" would reap the rewards.

May be threads like this will help to educate.

One more thought, always run speaker wire in conduit, not just in wall. I hope you will not need those speaker wires much longer, but balanced audio or optical cables instead!
Yea, like he said.

DJ
 
davidtwotrees

davidtwotrees

Audioholic General
David, thanks for that link. I have I think made all those points about this issue in my posts over the years......

We badly need someone of Peter Walker's drive for innovation for this. I know that if he was still with us he would be there already. As it is he did the spade work for the active Quad's talked about here. .......
May be threads like this will help to educate.
Dr. Mark! Glad you showed up. I'd mentioned how I was moving in with my fiance' this winter, and the area for my rig is really, really tight. Almost to tight for my large Canton's..........hence I have been looking at and reading up on stand mount monitors with a small sub. Most movies that I watch are dramas and don't require a giant sound system, so music is where I spend most of my time. I've looked at the B&W CM line. Many others. Dynaudio. But the passive Quads began intriguing me, and then I noticed the active Quads.
Can you tell us your opinion of the Quad 11 and 12 active, and passive, if you'd care to take the time to look at them? Thanks in advance, Maestro.
 
A

audiohonic65

Audioholic
Its always better to see it to believe it!
May be you can plan your next holidays to London for some good window shopping :)
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top