I have used blown-in insulation in riser construction. Messy and something of a pain. (Especially if the top of the riser has already been screwed on!) Aside from that, also quite effective.
As for tuning, the size of the holes do determine the "center frequency" of the riser, but since Gene's riser is floated on the U-Boats, there is some exchange of energy between the riser chambers due to the airspaces at the bottom of the joists. This changes the resonance effect, making the riser more wideband overall. There is still a limited bandwidth of effectiveness, but, relative to a riser with distinctly separated chambers, the riser as a whole has a lower Q with lower overall absorption. Small price to pay. I always prefer low-Q and lower relative α as opposed to high-Q and a higher relative α. I.e., I'd rather hit an octave or more with an LF device like this and sacrifice 25-50% of the absorption instead of having a device with extremely high absorption over a range of 5-10 Hz. Make sense?