Radical catholic supreme court nominee

[lovinthehd]

Am I alone in thinking it's time to get rid of these radical christian charlatans pretending to be human beings? Sounds like some radical islam mullah rather than a judge....and from a silly school like Notre Dame, come on!

 

[mazersteven]

Your just pushing your Fucking Agenda

 

[lovinthehd]

Yes, my fucking agenda would concentrate on real fucking, unlike that phony baloney poop the catholics do

 

[Trebdp83]

I think she is there because they are trying to push THEIR fucking agenda. Come on, the girl looks like Carrie. If the Dems had any brains at all they would have hired Piper Laurie to show up and scream "They're all going to laugh at you!"

 

[lovinthehd]

Your just pushing your Fucking Agenda

Then again there's always your meatball agenda....

 

[mtrycrafts]

Your just pushing your Fucking Agenda

Everybody is pushing their agenda, no? Some may just not be posting but they still have one.
I have been pushing my DBT agenda since coming here.

 

[lovinthehd]

I'm not against most agendas but the radical christian right scares the truck out of me in its sheer stupidity.

 

[carlthess40]

She will be a great supreme court justice. Anyone who thinks anything different is a nutcase. She’s a constitutionalist and goes by what the original Constitution was written as. And for all you idiots that think just because she’s a Christian/Catholic but that is going to make a difference then you’re full of crap. If she was Muslim or some other religious form there would be total outrage from all you left wing liberals and nut jobs crying foul because anyone mentioned their religion. Just because she’s Catholic it’s open game on attacking her religious beliefs. Do some background reading on her she is a wonderful judge and has been and will continue to be


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[3db]

Everybody is pushing their agenda, no? Some may just not be posting but they still have one.
I have been pushing my DBT agenda since coming here.

I knew there wasn't something quite right about you. Carry on my friend. Im not quite right or wrong either.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I'm not against most agendas but the radical christian right scares the truck out of me in its sheer stupidity.

It's control and power over others to make them assimilate.

 

[mtrycrafts]

She will be a great supreme court justice. Anyone who thinks anything different is a nutcase. She’s a constitutionalist and goes by what the original Constitution was written as. And for all you idiots that think just because she’s a Christian/Catholic but that is going to make a difference then you’re full of crap. If she was Muslim or some other religious form there would be total outrage from all you left wing liberals and nut jobs crying foul because anyone mentioned their religion. Just because she’s Catholic it’s open game on attacking her religious beliefs. Do some background reading on her she is a wonderful judge and has been and will continue to be
...

Unfortunately, the original constitution was written a long time ago and the world has left them behind. Some just cannot accept that fact and try to assimilate others to their thinking process. All about power and control.
And, when she cannot leave her religion out of her decision making, what then? Where will you stand? But of course you would like that. It shows.
As has been stated elsewhere, her footprints are visible.

 

[GO-NAD!]

Am I alone in thinking it's time to get rid of these radical christian charlatans pretending to be human beings? Sounds like some radical islam mullah rather than a judge....and from a silly school like Notre Dame, come on!

Dude, while you and I agree on many things, do you not recognize the irony in your statement?

 

[Jeff R.]

We will just pick and choose which religions are permitted and if your level of dedication to your religion aligns with a certain anointed groups views. Heck we can just delete freedom of religion from the constitution.

I’m sure that will fix our issues in this country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[highfigh]

I'm not against most agendas but the radical christian right scares the truck out of me in its sheer stupidity.

How do you feel about the radical Left? How about Biden- he's a 'devout' Catholic, but some in the RC church (a couple of Bishops) say he's a bad Catholic.

2020 Candidate Joe Biden Identifies as Catholic, But Breaks With Church Teaching

On abortion and the redefinition of marriage, Biden has been publicly corrected by U.S. bishops for contradicting Catholic moral doctrines.

www.ncregister.com

Joe Biden Tells Christians He's the "Clear Moral Choice," But He Backs Abortions Up to Birth - LifeNews.com

Christian leaders criticized 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden for “deceptive ads” highlighting the former vice president’s faith to Catholic and Evangelical voters. Biden’s campaign is launching a seven-figure ad buy in October targeting religious Americans, Religion News Service reported...

www.lifenews.com

I like the Python Spanish Inquisition skit, myself.

I don't think anyone should run on their faith but then, they shouldn't dump on other candidates for theirs, either.

 

[Jeff R.]

How do you feel about the radical Left?

I like the Python Spanish Inquisition skit, myself.

I actually don’t really like either radical side of our country. I am pretty center of it all in my opinion. However I do respect their right to their views and beliefs as long as they are not hurting anybody or negatively impacting folks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[highfigh]

I actually don’t really like either radical side of our country. I am pretty center of it all in my opinion. However I do respect their right to their views and beliefs as long as they are not hurting anybody or negatively impacting folks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree- I don't like people trying to force others to joint their club/cult, either.

 

[Trell]

We will just pick and choose which religions are permitted and if your level of dedication to your religion aligns with a certain anointed groups views. Heck we can just delete freedom of religion from the constitution.

I’m sure that will fix our issues in this country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's all about how one's religion/faith/superstition (take your pick) will affect the rulings in a society that on paper guarantees freedom of religion/faith/superstition (take your pick again).

As an orthodox Catholic that is member of a cult where one makes an oath of obedience to the leader, you for sure want to know which oath is the deciding one: The cult leader or the Supreme Court.

On the topic here is a good read with respect to her religion:

Is it anti-Catholic to ask a Supreme Court nominee how her religion affects her decisions?

President Trump’s nominee has written about how religious views and judicial views intersect — and sometimes collide.

www.vox.com

 

[Jeff R.]

It's all about how one's religion/faith/superstition (take your pick) will affect the rulings in a society that on paper guarantees freedom of religion/faith/superstition (take your pick again).

As an orthodox Catholic that is member of a cult where one makes an oath of obedience to the leader, you for sure want to know which oath is the deciding one: The cult leader or the Supreme Court.

On the topic here is a good read with respect to her religion:

Is it anti-Catholic to ask a Supreme Court nominee how her religion affects her decisions?

President Trump’s nominee has written about how religious views and judicial views intersect — and sometimes collide.

www.vox.com

You may feel that way. However judges on the Supreme Court are to be impartial and focus only on the law and how it applies to the case at hand. If you can prove that somebody is not going to be impartial based on their record, that is one thing. If the dems could do that they certain would have. I am not sure anybody can pin that on this woman. She still has freedom of religion and nobody can take that from her. If she gets in the role and does start the cult you fear, then there are ways the government can address this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Trell]

You may feel that way. However judges on the Supreme Court are to be impartial and focus only on the law and how it applies to the case at hand. If you can prove that somebody is not going to be impartial based on their record, that is one thing. If the dems could do that they certain would have. I am not sure anybody can pin that on this woman. She still has freedom of religion and nobody can take that from her. If she gets in the role and does start the cult you fear, then there are ways the government can address this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why do you say "feeling"? I even included a link to a very reasoned rebuttal of your post? Did you read it?

 

[Jeff R.]

So because the vox wrote an article it is a fact?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk