I'm only speaking for myself, not audioholics, here:
I agree that measurements would be nice, and
I wish I had the equipment and knowledge to do amplifier measurements. Gene does, but his time is in short supply. I know he's put the call out before, but if there are any readers who feel they could competently complete amplifier measurements for review, please contact Gene.
If I could offer, short of apparent design issues, the power portion of consumer level amps in the $500 are all sufficient for more home users. I know that may be a controversial statement, but if you look at all the measurements of $500 amp reviews, the all have ruler flat response through the audible band and can handle 6-8ohm loads at reference level in a small home environment. Until you start looking at driving 2-4 ohm loads, or cranking loud volumes in large spaces, the amplifier doesn't realy impact much, and then, you shouldn't be looking at a $500 AVR.
Once again, I agree that a certain amount of credibility is lent with measurements in a review, I just don't know, personally, after decades of reading reviews on consumer-grade AVR amps, how useful they are. As other readers have pointed out, the GUI, connection flexibility, EQ features, and other end-user experiences are more valuable to the day-to-day and I try to cover as much of that as possible.
First off, thank you for the review. Second, where are the test bench results?
It would be nice to have a comprehensive technical report on this component. If no testing is done, other than subjective sighted reporting, which, let's face it, isn't exactly testing anything other than your biases and prejudices, then your review is no different to any other review, on just about any other website.
Just some constructive criticism. I do think adding a technical section to the review, like in past reviews (well, a few years ago anyway), would be more valuable to the reader, at least as it pertains to amplifiers.
Just my opinion, use it or don't use it.