? on remaster quality

[KEW]

I am looking for some of my favorite old music on CD's. Amazon often lists remastered versions, import versions, etc. Is there a website where audiophiles discuss which version offers the best SQ?
Also is Amazon the right place to shop?
Thanks!

 

[Biggiesized]

I am looking for some of my favorite old music on CD's. Amazon often lists remastered versions, import versions, etc. Is there a website where audiophiles discuss which version offers the best SQ?

Aren't you on it?

On a serious note, if you're looking for discussion on specific albums, your best bet is to Google the name of the album plus terms like remastered and see what turns up.

 

[skizzerflake]

There are lots of recommendations (based on what they sell) on the Accoustic Sounds Catalog. Their preference is for vinyl and SACD. The Stereophile magazine web site has blogs and forums that discuss sound quality and remasters in gruesome detail.

 

[KEW]

The Stereophile magazine web site has blogs and forums that discuss sound quality and remasters in gruesome detail.

Is this in the context of specific albums or the general concept of remastering across the board. I poked around there and didn't have much luck finding discussions such as which version is the best specific to (for example) Abbey Road or Dark Side of the Moon.
Thanks!

 

[john72953]

Is this in the context of specific albums or the general concept of remastering across the board. I poked around there and didn't have much luck finding discussions such as which version is the best specific to (for example) Abbey Road or Dark Side of the Moon.
Thanks!

The new Beatles remastered CD's that are being released on 09.09.09 have received an excellent review from TONE. They raved about the quality....

Regarding DSOTM I've found the hybrid SACD to be the best performing release, although the Mofi Original CD is very good as well.

John

 

[Biggiesized]

The new Beatles remastered CD's that are being released on 09.09.09 have received an excellent review from TONE. They raved about the quality....

Regarding DSOTM I've found the hybrid SACD to be the best performing release, although the Mofi Original CD is very good as well.

John

Some people really dig the quadraphonic mix on the DVD-Audio release.

 

[john72953]

Some people really dig the quadraphonic mix on the DVD-Audio release.

Some do...I agree!

John

 

[Sheep]

Remastering = LOUD.

SheepStar

 

[john72953]

Remastering = LOUD.

SheepStar

More often than not...YES!

There are exceptions. Witness the new Beatles Remastered compilations....they are outstanding from the review I read.

 

[Hawkeye]

Remastering = LOUD.

SheepStar

Not in all cases, but far too many I agree.

 

[Hawkeye]

I am looking for some of my favorite old music on CD's. Amazon often lists remastered versions, import versions, etc. Is there a website where audiophiles discuss which version offers the best SQ?

Try here - http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2 though I certainly would take opinions there with a grain of salt. Your own ears know what's best for you.

 

[cvcgolf]

Always get the remastered version. If you're into multi channel then get sacd wether it's in multi channel or a hybrid. Meaning it's in stereo but can also be played on a regular cd player as well as an sacd player.

Amazon is a good place to purchase products. Shipping takes a bit long at times.

 

[john72953]

Try here - http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2 though I certainly would take opinions there with a grain of salt. Your own ears know what's best for you.

There is no question that Steve Hoffman is one of the finest remastering experts around. Glad I read through the thread as I was about to post this very same link.

John

 

[john72953]

Always get the remastered version. If you're into multi channel then get sacd wether it's in multi channel or a hybrid. Meaning it's in stereo but can also be played on a regular cd player as well as an sacd player.

Amazon is a good place to purchase products. Shipping takes a bit long at times.

Not true. Some remasters have been butchered beyond recognition.

John

 

[Hawkeye]

Not true. Some remasters have been butchered beyond recognition.

John

Couldn't agree more.

 

[wcfields]

Couldn't agree more.

same here........in fact I've found quite a few remasters that are WORSE.

 

[KEW]

Always get the remastered version. If you're into multi channel then get sacd wether it's in multi channel or a hybrid. Meaning it's in stereo but can also be played on a regular cd player as well as an sacd player.

Amazon is a good place to purchase products. Shipping takes a bit long at times.

Is SACD a waste if I only play in stereo?
(I do have a SACD capable player)

 

[john72953]

Is SACD a waste if I only play in stereo?
(I do have a SACD capable player)

Absolutely NOT! People have the mistaken belief that SACD is for multi-channel only. SACD in 2-Channel is just as good. In fact, I listen to my small collection of SACD more in 2-channel.

If you have a DSD capable SACD player AND receiver (or amps), it will outperform a standard Redbook CD anytime.

John

 

[KEW]

If you have a DSD capable SACD player AND receiver (or amps), it will outperform a standard Redbook CD anytime.
John

I don't see anything to indicate my equipment is DSD capable. Is it a licensed & trademarked technology which would require a logo on the unit (like the compact disc icon)? If not, how would I check?
I'm assuming if it had it it would claim it, so am doubtful that either unit is DSD capable.
Here is the spec sheet on my CD player:
http://us.marantz.com/VC6001.pdf
Here is the spec sheet on my receiver:
http://ca.marantz.com/SR6001v2.pdf

Thanks,
Kurt

 

[Adam]

Hi, Kurt.

Your receiver does support direct DSD transfer over HDMI and can process it.

You disc player is not capable of transferring DSD over HDMI or any digital connection, though. You would need to have the player process the SACD audio and transfer it over the analog outputs.