Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: LCD Leading Way in Rapidly Growing HDTV Market

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow LCD Leading Way in Rapidly Growing HDTV Market

    Leading industry market research says LCD display shipments and HDTV subscription customers will double by 2012. The independent research data and adjustments in leading display manufacturer’s business strategies spell out LCD domination of the display market for the next four years.


    Discuss "LCD Leading Way in Rapidly Growing HDTV Market" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    Jack Hammer's Avatar
    Jack Hammer is offline Audioholic Field Marshall Jack Hammer should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    1,801
    Thanks Given
    311
    Thanks Received
    189

    Default

    I liked the original article title better, "Plasma TV Reels in it's Death Throes." But I understand the need to be PC after the last article.

    Jack
    Reciever - Denon 3808CI, DVD - Denon DVD-2910, BD - Sony PS3, TV - Panasonic TC-P50S1 50" Plasma, Speakers - LCR M&K S-150, SR M&K SS-150 Tripole, SRB M&K SS-150 Tripole, Subs M&K VX860 & M&K MPS-5160SF

  3. #3
    1tribeca is offline Audioholic 1tribeca is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    169
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    7

    Default

    Bothered! LCD leading the sales race over plasma isn't earth shattering news. I'm waiting to get some more details about the final Elite panel this summer, then I'm buying...either the current PRO-110, or the yet-to-be released plasma from Pioneer. Gotta figure it's lifespan will be long enough to last until there is a better (affordable) technolgy on the market so I can avoid watching TV on a computer mon...er...sorry LCD. YUCK!

  4. #4
    Wayde Robson's Avatar
    Wayde Robson is offline Moderator Wayde Robson should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Waterloo Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    486
    Thanks Given
    103
    Thanks Received
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by antennaguy View Post
    The benefits of Off-Air antennas are compelling. There is only so much room on cable or satellite bandwidth in which to squeeze signal, so data is compressed to fit, resulting in a somewhat "soft" picture. An OTA signal is the gold standard in digital reception because it's almost completely uncompressed and also FREE.
    I appreciate the info. As an opinionated HT writer I like the idea of promoting OTA any chance I get. I could have spun it into a pro-OTA rant.

    I think a lot of people just assume they have to get Cable or Satellite just because they need an HDTV signal. A lot of articles that I've read that discuss ideas like the 'chain' of HDTV video signals will include an HD-ready digital or satellite receiver in the chain. That's not true as you pointed out.

    Thanks and I'll be sure to keep that in mind.
    Wayde
    Wayde

    Tell me what you think in real time on Twitter @AudioholicsLive

  5. #5
    1tribeca is offline Audioholic 1tribeca is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    169
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    7

    Default

    Does anyone know of any trusty brands or models of antenna to pick up the aforementioned OTA very well?

  6. #6
    Jack Hammer's Avatar
    Jack Hammer is offline Audioholic Field Marshall Jack Hammer should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    1,801
    Thanks Given
    311
    Thanks Received
    189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1tribeca View Post
    Does anyone know of any trusty brands or models of antenna to pick up the aforementioned OTA very well?
    A few of my friends use the $20 Phillips antenna you can get at Target. I'm using a Radio Shack model that was ~$30. Honestly the best results I've seen were just using a cheap fm antenna. The kind supplied with most recievers that has two wires you pin to the wall on one end and a push on coax attachment at the other end. Don't believe anyone who says you cant get a digital signal with those. I've used it and got ~35 channels, all digital. I just finally went for one with a signal boost because I'm in a basement apartment and would loose certain channels when the weather was bad. (BTW, I get the exact same channels with or without the powered 'hdtv' antenna)

    Jack
    Reciever - Denon 3808CI, DVD - Denon DVD-2910, BD - Sony PS3, TV - Panasonic TC-P50S1 50" Plasma, Speakers - LCR M&K S-150, SR M&K SS-150 Tripole, SRB M&K SS-150 Tripole, Subs M&K VX860 & M&K MPS-5160SF

  7. #7
    Swerd's Avatar
    Swerd is offline Audioholic Samurai Swerd should be listened to
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gaithersburg, MD
    Posts
    2,275
    Thanks Given
    449
    Thanks Received
    1,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hammer View Post
    A few of my friends use the $20 Phillips antenna you can get at Target. I'm using a Radio Shack model that was ~$30. Honestly the best results I've seen were just using a cheap fm antenna. The kind supplied with most recievers that has two wires you pin to the wall on one end and a push on coax attachment at the other end. Don't believe anyone who says you cant get a digital signal with those. I've used it and got ~35 channels, all digital. I just finally went for one with a signal boost because I'm in a basement apartment and would loose certain channels when the weather was bad. (BTW, I get the exact same channels with or without the powered 'hdtv' antenna)
    I agree with Jack Hammer to the extent that you should try the simple cheap antennnas first. Often rabbit ears do the job. They should be able to receive UHF signals (channels 14-69) because that is where most digital TV broadcasts are. A simple FM folded dipole wire antenna may work OK if you are close enought to strong signals, but it is not designed to pick up UHF channels.

    The problem is that TV reception varies considerably depending on the distance from your home to the broadcast tower, your elevation, and the local terrain around your home. For example, you might be on a hillside that blocks reception. Tall buildings and trees also can have an effect. So, a one size fits all type of answer for an antenna can be misleading. Too much depends on your own local situation.

    For myself, I've had very good results with a Wineguard Squareshooter SS-1000 antenna. It's small (about the same size as a satellite dish) and can mounted almost anywhere. I put mine in my attic and installed a rotor so I can pickup both Washington, DC and Baltimore signals.

    Try to avoid using the powered or amplified antennas if you can. They can be trouble, but sometimes you need them.
    HT System
    Rcvr
    B&K AVR 507 Amp B&K EX4420 (main speakers) Main speakers Salk SongTower QWT Center Salk SongCenter Surrounds NHT SuperZero Subwoofer DIY PE RS 12" HF 2 ft³ cabinet with HPSA 500 amp BR player Panasonic DMP-BDT500 TV Panasonic TC-L37G1 Phonograph ARxa, Sumiko Oyster cartridge & Audio Technica PEQ3 preamp

    SongTower Listening Impressions - Photos

    2-channel system
    CD Player
    Sony CDP-591 Pre-amp Marantz 2230 stereo receiver Amplifier B&K ST-140 Speakers DIY 2-way CAOW1

  8. #8
    nybangali is offline Audiophyte nybangali is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default good post

    very helpful

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •