Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: SVS PB12-Plus vs Epik Phoenix need upgrade advice!

  1. #1
    m3maniac is offline Enthusiast m3maniac is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    52
    Thanks Received
    0

    Question SVS PB12-Plus vs Epik Phoenix need upgrade advice!

    The present set up 7.1: Denon AVR4802R
    Polk Lsi9 surround sounds-2 front, 2 side, 2 rear
    Polk Lsic center channel
    Infinity Northridge E250P subwoofer
    BenQ PE8700 projector
    PS3, X-Box 360, Scientific Atlanta HD-HDMI 1080i cable box
    Room size: 25’ long x 12’ wide with an 8’ ceiling
    Projector is located 12’-6” from front of screen. Screen size viewable 91” wide x 52” high
    Seating centrally located.

    I'm upgrading to the OPPO BDP-83 Blue-Ray player to enjoy the latest surround sound fields through the Denon.

    I would like to get a sub to compliment this set up.

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

  2. #2
    lsiberian's Avatar
    lsiberian is online now Audioholic Overlord lsiberian should be listened to
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    On A Bridge in Fort Worth
    Posts
    10,474
    Thanks Given
    4,235
    Thanks Received
    2,525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m3maniac View Post
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Look both ways when crossing the street.

    On the serious note:
    Epik has good commercial subs but for home theater I'd pick SVS. They have great finishes nice extension, and excellent customer service.

    If your good with wood though. Then build your own sub. The Kappa Perfect plans are on the DIY section of the site.

    I think either way would be a good satisfying choice. But I prefer SVS myself.
    Fronts:Madisound RB Kits Rears and Sides: Kef 2001.2, Subwoofer: TC Tiger-1000
    Receiver:Onkyo NR-708 Amp: Behringer EP4000 Players: Panasonic BDP-60, Onkyo DX-C390 Projector: Epson 8350 Screen: FAVI PD-HD-92

    Funny Quote(s):
    That's like trying to get decent sound in a public lavatory.-TLS Guy

    Heck, if you've got the cash, go the NSA supercomputer route and use Fluorinert- Adam

    A shovel of dirt can stop a flood. -Westom

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to lsiberian For This Useful Post:

    m3maniac (08-04-2009)

  4. #3
    m3maniac is offline Enthusiast m3maniac is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    52
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default What about upgrading to the SVS PB13-Ultra

    I'm still thinking if I only use one sub what about the SVS PB13-Ultra Sub?

    If I had the desire could I run two subs the SVS 12 or 13 with the JBL Northridge E250P? Or are they so unbalanced that it would be pointless?

  5. #4
    Matt34's Avatar
    Matt34 is online now Moderator Matt34 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    6,244
    Thanks Given
    1,385
    Thanks Received
    2,601

    Default

    The Phoenix is more comparable to the Ultra than the pb-12 plus. The difference between the Phoenix and the Ultra would IMO be very little with the Ultra having the options of different tunes and the ARO software bulit in.

    Two pluses will probably have more output above it's tuning frequency than either that Ultra or Phoenix.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt34 For This Useful Post:

    m3maniac (08-06-2009)

  7. #5
    Ron Temple is online now Senior Audioholic Ron Temple should be listened to
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    673
    Thanks Given
    43
    Thanks Received
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt34 View Post
    The Phoenix is more comparable to the Ultra than the pb-12 plus. The difference between the Phoenix and the Ultra would IMO be very little with the Ultra having the options of different tunes and the ARO software bulit in.

    Two pluses will probably have more output above it's tuning frequency than either that Ultra or Phoenix.
    I'm not sure I agree. I heard the Phoenix recently. I don't think the Phoenix is as close to the Ultra13 as you think. Could have been the different rooms and placement, so I'm not going to say anymore about that...great sub though.
    Back to SDAs...
    Fronts - SDA 1Cs
    Center - CS400i
    Surrounds - SDA 2Bs
    Onk 1007 pre/pro, Carver TFM 45, 35
    Oppo 83SE
    PB13 Ultra Rosenut
    BW Silver cables

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ron Temple For This Useful Post:

    m3maniac (08-06-2009),Matt34 (08-04-2009)

  9. #6
    Matt34's Avatar
    Matt34 is online now Moderator Matt34 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    6,244
    Thanks Given
    1,385
    Thanks Received
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Temple View Post
    I'm not sure I agree. I heard the Phoenix recently. I don't think the Phoenix is as close to the Ultra13 as you think. Could have been the different rooms and placement, so I'm not going to say anymore about that...great sub though.
    I guess I'm going off what other have said, some have referred to the Dragon as an Ultra in the sealed configuration so I would assume that the ported Phoenix would be close to the Ultra in it's 15hz tune. It would probably be close and likely only a in-room comparison of both would show the differences.

    As far the the OP issue, I would probably take the two pluses over either of the other single sub choices for your size of room.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt34 For This Useful Post:

    Ron Temple (08-04-2009)

  11. #7
    Ron Temple is online now Senior Audioholic Ron Temple should be listened to
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    673
    Thanks Given
    43
    Thanks Received
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt34 View Post
    I guess I'm going off what other have said, some have referred to the Dragon as an Ultra in the sealed configuration so I would assume that the ported Phoenix would be close to the Ultra in it's 15hz tune. It would probably be close and likely only a in-room comparison of both would show the differences.

    As far the the OP issue, I would probably take the two pluses over either of the other single sub choices for your size of room.
    I think I'm the one that said the Dragon and sealed Ultra are similar. That's what Chad told me. It was before I heard the Phoenix. You'd think the Phoenix and Ultra would be similar based on driver size, box and amp power. I'm sure they are somewhere in the FR. The Phoenix driver looks like it could handle twice the power. I'm not sure the amp can get it to xmax. Makes for a sweet sounding, effortless sub.

    Yep, a pair of Pluses are going to outdo them both, the last rev had more output than the U13, but in my room, I don't need it.
    Back to SDAs...
    Fronts - SDA 1Cs
    Center - CS400i
    Surrounds - SDA 2Bs
    Onk 1007 pre/pro, Carver TFM 45, 35
    Oppo 83SE
    PB13 Ultra Rosenut
    BW Silver cables

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Ron Temple For This Useful Post:

    m3maniac (08-06-2009)

  13. #8
    AVRat's Avatar
    AVRat is offline Audioholic Ninja AVRat should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    3,790
    Thanks Given
    353
    Thanks Received
    680

    Default

    M3, how much are you looking to spend? Either of these subs will perform magnanimously in your 2400 cu. ft. room. Believe me, just one Plus alone performs well with plenty of output in my 3600 cu. ft. area. Now, if you'd like to consider a dual setup then perhaps dual Epik Sentinels will fit into the budget. And yes we're talking a single Ultra at this budget level which will surely push the performance envelope.

    Check the sticky for multi-subs at the top of this forum.
    Mitsubishi LaserVue L75-A91, Denon AVR-4810CI, Oppo BDP-83, Escient FireBall MX-111, APC H15
    Speakers: L/R - ESS AMT Monitor, Def Tech ProCenter C2, UIW BP In-wall, UIW 64 In-ceiling, Dual SVS PB12-PLUS, Def Tech SuperCube I

    Zone 2 (3 Areas through Niles HUB8, Niles MSU-480, Niles TS-110 Table Top Sensor & 3 x Niles IM/VC w/IR sensor)
    Paradigm CS60R In-ceiling 2 Pair

    Exterior -- Backyard Patio
    Paradigm Stylus 250

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to AVRat For This Useful Post:

    m3maniac (08-06-2009)

  15. #9
    Patrukas777's Avatar
    Patrukas777 is offline Senior Audioholic Patrukas777 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    737
    Thanks Given
    353
    Thanks Received
    191

    Default

    I would go SVS...Dual if possible. Im will be buying my 2nd Ultra in the next week or two. Great sound, great customer service, and great looking subs!

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Patrukas777 For This Useful Post:

    m3maniac (08-06-2009)

  17. #10
    m3maniac is offline Enthusiast m3maniac is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    52
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default SVS Ultra or dual Epik Sentinels?

    Quote Originally Posted by AVRat View Post
    M3, how much are you looking to spend? Either of these subs will perform magnanimously in your 2400 cu. ft. room. Believe me, just one Plus alone performs well with plenty of output in my 3600 cu. ft. area. Now, if you'd like to consider a dual setup then perhaps dual Epik Sentinels will fit into the budget. And yes we're talking a single Ultra at this budget level which will surely push the performance envelope.

    Check the sticky for multi-subs at the top of this forum.
    So for my particluar set up with the Denon 4802 and room size which makes the most sense? About the same price. I guess the Infinity E250P is out as the second Sub, correct?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •