Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: HSU Research VTF-3 MK3 Subwoofer Review

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow HSU Research VTF-3 MK3 Subwoofer Review

    The Hsu Research VTF-3 Mk3 is a well designed product, packing a terrific driver, obviously crafted with an emphasis on the basic features that are important to deliver maximum bang for the buck in a product in its price class. Within its limits, it did a number of things exceptionally well. Add to all that product support, a very useful, interesting manual and small enough to fit comfortably in all but the tiniest locales and in the VTF-3 Mk3 you find a truly top-flight product and an excellent investment for the discerning movie and music lover. I was consistently surprised by how well Dr Hsu managed to get this thoroughbred with a 12” driver to perform on a consistent basis. I’ll close with a strong buy recommendation; buy two if the budget allows for it!




    Discuss "HSU Research VTF-3 MK3 Subwoofer Review " here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    acacia987 is offline Junior Audioholic acacia987 is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    90
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    3

    Default

    so what is the difference between this and the turbo version? besides the 100 bucks?

  3. #3
    GlocksRock's Avatar
    GlocksRock is offline Audioholic Spartan GlocksRock should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    6,136
    Thanks Given
    287
    Thanks Received
    910

    Default

    I'm guessing the turbo version just adds the ugly turbo charger, for more bass.
    SHARP Aquos LC70LE640U
    Denon AVR-4311ci, Emotiva IPS-1
    APC H15 Power Conditioner
    PS3, Wii, XBOX 360 Elite Slim
    Dell Inspiron 660 HTPC
    Def Tech BP7001SC, CLR3000, BPX, BP10, BP2X
    SVS PB13-Ultra on Great Gramma
    Harmony One

    Bedroom System
    Samsung PN58C590
    Explorer 4250 HD cable box
    Yamaha RX-V1800 Onkyo M-5140 amp
    Xbox 360 Elite, PS3 Slim
    Dell Vostro 400 HTPC
    Def Tech BP7006, CLR2300, BPX
    SVS PC12 Ultra & 20-39PC+ on Subdude HD
    Panamax M8-HT-Pro
    Harmony One

  4. #4
    Gimpy Ric's Avatar
    Gimpy Ric is offline Moderator Gimpy Ric should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Birmingham Alabama
    Posts
    1,091
    Thanks Given
    212
    Thanks Received
    223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GlocksRock View Post
    I'm guessing the turbo version just adds the ugly turbo charger, for more bass.
    I've got the "ugly" Turbo on my more powerful HO and by extending the port length you do indeed get deeper bass. And remember, beauty is in the eye of the beholder!

  5. #5
    Peter Marcks is offline Banned Peter Marcks is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    125
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    2

    Default

    Thanks to Mark for the kind and well-written review!!!

    Turbocharger increases the low-turbulent air-moving capability by doubling the port length--and hence maintaining full port cross-sectional area--instead of reducing the port cross-sectional area in half in order to obtain the lower extended bass tuning mode. I'm not sure why anyone would care to characterize it as "ugly", it is just a small box sitting on top of a much much larger box. The bent ports of the turbocharger really can't even be seen from the listening position. Also, it takes mere seconds to remove the turbo when not in use.

    Most of the time, when using a single VTF-3 Mk3 without MBM-12, it would be best to run the subwoofer in max output mode for widest dynamic range and maximum output capability. Only on material with very deep bass (pipe organ music and some movies) would it be beneficial to use turbocharger.

    Note that an MBM-12 will work really well with a VTF-3 Mk3 (with or without turbo). The MBM will take system performance to a much higher level.

    Sincerely,

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter Marcks For This Useful Post:

    gene (10-23-2007)

  7. #6
    annunaki's Avatar
    annunaki is offline Moderator annunaki should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Wausau, WI
    Posts
    4,214
    Thanks Given
    1,045
    Thanks Received
    1,257

    Default

    The turbo is a good idea but I don't like the idea of so many bends in the ports. There is one bend inside the enclosure and then two? outside if using the turbo. The bends just increase the likely hood for port noise. This seemed to show up in the review.

    It is a great product and innovative design, no doubt though. Why not make a new sub that is a bit bigger (enclosure to house everything) with longer, straighter ports? Problem solved. I can see it as a great add on to existing sub systems though.

  8. #7
    Peter Marcks is offline Banned Peter Marcks is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    125
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    2

    Default

    The bent ports in this patent-pending design were engineered specifically to reduce turbulence associated with the port bend.

    Mark did not review the turbocharger. He mentioned port noise tendencies only in the extended bass mode with port plug, which is exactly the situation we were trying to move away from with turbocharger. Port noise is definitely not an issue with the turbocharger.

    Sure one could design a larger enclosure, but even that would see a performance benefit from using turbocharger instead of plugging a port to reduce port tuning. The idea was definitely to make the unit install in a modular fashion.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter Marcks For This Useful Post:

    annunaki (10-25-2007)

  10. #8
    annunaki's Avatar
    annunaki is offline Moderator annunaki should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Wausau, WI
    Posts
    4,214
    Thanks Given
    1,045
    Thanks Received
    1,257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Marcks View Post
    The bent ports in this patent-pending design were engineered specifically to reduce turbulence associated with the port bend.

    Mark did not review the turbocharger. He mentioned port noise tendencies only in the extended bass mode with port plug, which is exactly the situation we were trying to move away from with turbocharger. Port noise is definitely not an issue with the turbocharger.

    Sure one could design a larger enclosure, but even that would see a performance benefit from using turbocharger instead of plugging a port to reduce port tuning. The idea was definitely to make the unit install in a modular fashion.
    That makes sense.

  11. #9
    paulf7509 is offline Audiophyte paulf7509 is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    thanks for that review - it was very helpful as I am currently searching for subwoofers for my home theater system

  12. #10
    bigbangtheory is offline Awaiting Registration Conf bigbangtheory is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Plano, TX
    Posts
    133
    Thanks Given
    14
    Thanks Received
    2

    Default

    I've been doing a lot of research and talking to manufacturers lately about subs. My conclusion has been that HSU and SVS Sound probably offer the best bang for the buck performance of ANY sub company. I also know from word of mouth and some anecdotal evidence too that these companies are in it for the long haul and know how to take care of their customers.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •