After a couple of teaser press releases, one at CES and one just a short while ago, the HDMI Licensing organization has released the final version of the HDMI 1.4 spec. This is the first major HDMI spec revision since 1.3 was issued back in June 2006, and there's been a lot of speculation as to what it would contain. The spec document itself is available for download at www.hdmi.org. However, since it's 425 pages long, we'll take a short spin through it to see what's there, with a particular emphasis on the impact of the new spec upon our products: HDMI cables.
Discuss "HDMI 1.4 Cables: No News is (Mostly) Good News" here. Read the article.
After a couple of teaser press releases, one at CES and one just a short while ago, the HDMI Licensing organization has released the final version of the HDMI 1.4 spec. This is the first major HDMI spec revision since 1.3 was issued back in June 2006, and there's been a lot of speculation as to what it would contain. The spec document itself is available for download at www.hdmi.org. However, since it's 425 pages long, we'll take a short spin through it to see what's there, with a particular emphasis on the impact of the new spec upon our products: HDMI cables.
Discuss "HDMI 1.4 Cables: No News is (Mostly) Good News" here. Read the article.
Thanks Kurt. I do have a few questions. How is the audio split from the video or is it? I assume the bandwidth is shared between the two signals. Do they run on separate pairs or are they combined and split by the end device?
__________________ His and Her Room!
Klipsch RF7's,RC7,RS7's,RSW15,Denon 3805, Samsung BD-P1200, Toshiba HD-XA2, VIP622 HD DVR, 100" BW Carada Critereon, Panasonic AE700u, Wega 27",300 Disk CD Changer,Laurier-Carino AV Credenza, Logitech Harmony 1000 with RF extender, Impact Acoustics 5x1 HDMI switch,Tripp Lite HT10DBS, Blue Jean Cables March 2007 Issue Home Theater Magazine and Audio Video Interiors
If you mean the new "audio return channel," that's run in the "new" twisted pair, which also carries the Ethernet channel, separate from the video. I don't know anything much about the encoding scheme for the audio return channel as I haven't had the time to dig in and really understand that part of the spec yet.
If you mean HDMI audio generally, that's embedded in the video signal, sharing the video bandwidth. HDMI audio doesn't affect the bitrate, however--regardless of the audio format used, the total bitrate stays the same.
If you mean the new "audio return channel," that's run in the "new" twisted pair, which also carries the Ethernet channel, separate from the video. I don't know anything much about the encoding scheme for the audio return channel as I haven't had the time to dig in and really understand that part of the spec yet.
If you could fill us in once you have had a chance to digest the material covering the new twisted pair and its audio component, I would appreciate it. As always, your articles are always a good read and a good source for new information. Thanks again.
__________________ His and Her Room!
Klipsch RF7's,RC7,RS7's,RSW15,Denon 3805, Samsung BD-P1200, Toshiba HD-XA2, VIP622 HD DVR, 100" BW Carada Critereon, Panasonic AE700u, Wega 27",300 Disk CD Changer,Laurier-Carino AV Credenza, Logitech Harmony 1000 with RF extender, Impact Acoustics 5x1 HDMI switch,Tripp Lite HT10DBS, Blue Jean Cables March 2007 Issue Home Theater Magazine and Audio Video Interiors
Will do. Suffice it to say that the audio return/ethernet supplement to the spec is one of the most confusing spec documents I've opened in these last few years. They've basically stuck the signals right on top of one another, with the ethernet portion run balanced but the audio return run unbalanced, and I can only imagine that it's a bit of a challenge for the circuit design people out there to figure out how to cleanly separate this stuff so that both features work correctly.
Will do. Suffice it to say that the audio return/ethernet supplement to the spec is one of the most confusing spec documents I've opened in these last few years. They've basically stuck the signals right on top of one another, with the ethernet portion run balanced but the audio return run unbalanced, and I can only imagine that it's a bit of a challenge for the circuit design people out there to figure out how to cleanly separate this stuff so that both features work correctly.
Since the ethernet can not share the shielding for a return signal, I assume the audio signal would take precedence for its use?
__________________ His and Her Room!
Klipsch RF7's,RC7,RS7's,RSW15,Denon 3805, Samsung BD-P1200, Toshiba HD-XA2, VIP622 HD DVR, 100" BW Carada Critereon, Panasonic AE700u, Wega 27",300 Disk CD Changer,Laurier-Carino AV Credenza, Logitech Harmony 1000 with RF extender, Impact Acoustics 5x1 HDMI switch,Tripp Lite HT10DBS, Blue Jean Cables March 2007 Issue Home Theater Magazine and Audio Video Interiors
Because the audio is run unbalanced, I think effectively the shield there is the return, while the Ethernet channel, having the "minus" and plus, doesn't need a separate return and so doesn't really use the shield (except, of course, in the sense that the shielding helps prevent crosstalk with the other conductors in the bundle). But as I said, I haven't yet had the chance to really sit down and digest this and it may be that the truth is something stranger still.
HDMI 1.4 Cables: No News is (Mostly) Good News
Linear Mode
