Parasound has introduced a new $2000 A/V preamp processor designed for sound purists seeking superior low-noise performance from classic stereo sources as well as multichannel music and movies from Blu-ray, DVD-Audio, and SACD players. But where's the beef? Considering its lack of video switching, audio decoding, and HDMI support, one wonders if this is more or less a re-issued legacy product with minor upgrades or if it's a completely new design which just happens to lack several features commonly found on receivers starting at $249.
Discuss "Parasound Halo P7 AV Preamp / Processor" here. Read the article.
This might hae been a great product circa 1998 but it seems a little odd for introduction in 2008, like it's obsolete before it's introduced. I have a new corporate slogan to suggest.
ARCAM - perfecting 20th century technology for the 21st century.
Seriously, I think a lot of high end companies are going to ignore HDMI and hope it goes away. I've heard from my local high end source that these companies either don't have or don't want to expend the resources to integrate HDMI into their products.
__________________
Dave.
Dynaudio Focus 140, Era D5 LCR Center + Era D3 surrounds, SVS PB12-Plus, Integra DTC 9.8, Rotel RMB-1075, Toshiba Regza 52", Bell HD-PVR Satellite, Panasonic BD35, Escient Fireball, SMS-1, Panamax 5300EX.
The Following User Says Thank You to Davemcc For This Useful Post:
Some (not all) of these companies could probably buy a retail mid-fi receiver, redo the casing, and have a better product for half of what they pay to make their own. This product would be fine for two-channel, but it's slightly perplexing when it addresses multi-channel in essentially an analogue-only format.
__________________
Clint DeBoer
Editor in Chief Audioholics
I知 with AcuDefTechGuy on this one. I知 actually hoping for an Audio Research MP1 to pop up on Audiogon or EBay every since I looked at his system a month or so ago. His approach may be a good way to get off the expensive side of constantly upgrading, the prepros or receivers, and limit the upgrading to the (usually) less expensive source components.
The MP1 has three 5.1 inputs vs. the Parasound痴 two 7.1 inputs. Both have a bunch of two channel inputs. I知 thinking a Sony 9000ES on one input for SACD (almost all my listening now is multichannel SACD). A Denon 3800 for watching Blue-ray and DVD. And a receiver for the third input to use when decoding Dolby Digital while watching HD TV (which AcuDefTechGuy does not do in his setup).
Downside; a boatload of wires. No Audyssey. No 7.1. Probably more.
I知 with AcuDefTechGuy on this one. I知 actually hoping for an Audio Research MP1 to pop up on Audiogon or EBay every since I looked at his system a month or so ago. His approach may be a good way to get off the expensive side of constantly upgrading, the prepros or receivers, and limit the upgrading to the (usually) less expensive source components.
The MP1 has three 5.1 inputs vs. the Parasound痴 two 7.1 inputs. Both have a bunch of two channel inputs. I知 thinking a Sony 9000ES on one input for SACD (almost all my listening now is multichannel SACD). A Denon 3800 for watching Blue-ray and DVD. And a receiver for the third input to use when decoding Dolby Digital while watching HD TV (which AcuDefTechGuy does not do in his setup).
Downside; a boatload of wires. No Audyssey. No 7.1. Probably more.
Russ
Well, I'm planning on getting a Denon Pre-Pro NEXT YEAR just to make everyone happy.
I would just hook the pre-pro to the amps' power-direct input, which is essentially the HT-Bypass.
I would use the Pre-Pro for HDMI switching, HD Radio, Internet Radio, and maybe one day HD Satellite Sound Processing.
For BD, SACD, DVD-A/V, I would not use the Pre-Pro at all.
I don't plan on ever using the Audyssey feature, not even on the AVP-A1HDCI! Manual function + analog as much as possible is best for me.
7.1 HT is still jut a gimmick to me. I just don't buy into it.