Audioholics Home Theater Forums
store.audioholics.com EMPTek.com BlueJeansCable.com Emotiva.com VisualApex.com Yamaha.com/yec SpectraCal.com MonoPrice.com

Go Back   Audioholics Home Theater Forums > Home Theater Hardware Hangout > Loudspeakers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:02 AM
admin admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 283 Times in 140 Posts
admin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AHadmin is looking for a job at AH
Arrow Usher Audio Be-718 Tiny Dancer Speaker Review

If you are on the market for a dynamic pair of compact speakers with a high Spouse Acceptance Factor (SAF), dynamic audio performance on par with speakers twice their price, and an ability to create a sound image nearly on par with full sized speakers, than I urge you to consider the Usher Audio Be-718 Tiny Dancer speakers seriously. They are absolutely gorgeous, with the piano gloss center section and beautiful wood side panels making them right at home in a medium sized den with a tube amplifier softening that hard edge while sipping a 20 year old brandy. The Be-718 Tiny Dancer’s are not without peer, as there are other bookshelves, and even some floor standing speakers that perform admirably at or near this price point, but the combination of sturdy construction, excellent engineering, innovative tweeter design and implementation, and performance per dollar spent put these substantial sound boxes into the “if this is your price range, put these on your short list of speakers to audition” checkbox. It was truly my pleasure to review these highly capable pair of speakers with décor friendly appeal, and musicality nearly beyond reproach.




Discuss " Usher Audio Be-718 Tiny Dancer Speaker Review" here. Read the article.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:05 AM
mazersteven's Avatar
mazersteven mazersteven is offline
Audioholic Spartan
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,852
Thanks: 1,081
Thanked 1,243 Times in 902 Posts
mazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened tomazersteven should be listened to
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by admin View Post
If you are on the market for a dynamic pair of compact speakers with a high Spouse Acceptance Factor (SAF), dynamic audio performance on par with speakers twice their price, and an ability to create a sound image nearly on par with full sized speakers, than I urge you to consider the Usher Audio Be-718 Tiny Dancer speakers seriously. They are absolutely gorgeous, with the piano gloss center section and beautiful wood side panels making them right at home in a medium sized den with a tube amplifier softening that hard edge while sipping a 20 year old brandy. The Be-718 Tiny Dancer’s are not without peer, as there are other bookshelves, and even some floor standing speakers that perform admirably at or near this price point, but the combination of sturdy construction, excellent engineering, innovative tweeter design and implementation, and performance per dollar spent put these substantial sound boxes into the “if this is your price range, put these on your short list of speakers to audition” checkbox. It was truly my pleasure to review these highly capable pair of speakers with décor friendly appeal, and musicality nearly beyond reproach.


When are you bringing them down for us to hear?
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:35 AM
Davemcc's Avatar
Davemcc Davemcc is offline
Audioholic Spartan
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mexicanada
Posts: 5,519
Thanks: 667
Thanked 1,914 Times in 1,335 Posts
Davemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened toDavemcc should be listened to
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by admin View Post
I also used this as my break-in song to flex the woofer for about 8 hours and truly let the surrounds settle in.
Is Audioholics advocating a speaker break-in period now?

From the article "Speaker Break In: Fact or Fiction? "Required break in time for the common spider-diaphragm-surround is typically on the order of 10s of seconds and is a one-off proposition, not requiring repetition."
__________________
Dave.
Dynaudio Focus 140, Era D5 LCR Center + Era D3 surrounds, SVS PB12-Plus, Integra DTC 9.8, Rotel RMB-1075, Toshiba Regza 52", Bell HD-PVR Satellite, Panasonic BD35, Escient Fireball, SMS-1, Panamax 5300EX.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:02 AM
3db 3db is offline
Audioholic Ninja
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,003
Thanks: 296
Thanked 337 Times in 293 Posts
3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davemcc View Post
Is Audioholics advocating a speaker break-in period now?

From the article "Speaker Break In: Fact or Fiction? "Required break in time for the common spider-diaphragm-surround is typically on the order of 10s of seconds and is a one-off proposition, not requiring repetition."
oh oh!! Someone just got an "F" on their report card.

Seriouslly, why does Audioholics mention this 8 hour breakin as Dave has pointed out.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 12-03-2007, 11:07 AM
Clint DeBoer's Avatar
Clint DeBoer Clint DeBoer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,844
Thanks: 323
Thanked 543 Times in 314 Posts
Clint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened to
Default

If a manufacturer recommends it (within reason) we often capitulate so they don't have any excuse on our results...
__________________
Clint DeBoer
Editor in Chief
Audioholics
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 12-03-2007, 01:12 PM
Seth=L Seth=L is online now
Audioholic Warlord
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,722
Thanks: 954
Thanked 1,089 Times in 870 Posts
Seth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened toSeth=L should be listened to
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint DeBoer View Post
If a manufacturer recommends it (within reason) we often capitulate so they don't have any excuse on our results...
Oh LOL, how grand.

They remind me of the Sonus Faber Concertos.

http://www.stereotimes.com/speak030800.shtml
__________________
Be bored.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 12-03-2007, 01:33 PM
gene's Avatar
gene gene is online now
Supreme Overlord
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,955
Thanks: 218
Thanked 482 Times in 297 Posts
gene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened to
Default

Quote:
Is Audioholics advocating a speaker break-in period now?

From the article "Speaker Break In: Fact or Fiction? "Required break in time for the common spider-diaphragm-surround is typically on the order of 10s of seconds and is a one-off proposition, not requiring repetition."
I don't censor our reviewers comments in their reviews so NO Audioholics isn't advocating it, but the particular reviewer is I suppose.
__________________
Gene DellaSala
President, Audioholics
Pursuing the truth in audio & video...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gene For This Useful Post:
Xander (12-06-2007)

  #8  
Old 12-03-2007, 02:27 PM
3db 3db is offline
Audioholic Ninja
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,003
Thanks: 296
Thanked 337 Times in 293 Posts
3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to3db should be listened to
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gene View Post
I don't censor our reviewers comments in their reviews so NO Audioholics isn't advocating it, but the particular reviewer is I suppose.
*LOL* I'm sorry but I find this situation rather amusing. Thanks guys!! It wasa much need chuckle.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 12-03-2007, 03:50 PM
gliz's Avatar
gliz gliz is offline
Audioholic
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: dallas
Posts: 214
Thanks: 43
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
gliz has a small fan clubgliz has a small fan club
Default

I have to wonder just how good a $2700 speaker can really sound. When do the laws of physics trump price? I bet that this speaker sounds fantastic, but is it really better than a 800 to 1000 dollar system. help me out here fellas, am I missing the point?
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." -- Gerald Rudolph Ford

Last edited by gliz : 12-03-2007 at 03:51 PM. Reason: cant type!
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 12-03-2007, 04:00 PM
silversurfer silversurfer is offline
Senior Audioholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 684
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
silversurfer is gaining some recognition
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gliz View Post
I have to wonder just how good a $2700 speaker can really sound. When do the laws of physics trump price? I bet that this speaker sounds fantastic, but is it really better than a 800 to 1000 dollar system. help me out here fellas, am I missing the point?
What kind of systems have you heard? Have you found that $800-$1000 systems sound better than ones that are $300-$500?
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 AUDIOHOLICS, LLC