Audioholics Home Theater Forums
store.audioholics.com EMPTek.com BlueJeansCable.com Emotiva.com VisualApex.com Yamaha.com/yec SpectraCal.com MonoPrice.com

Go Back   Audioholics Home Theater Forums > Home Theater Hardware Hangout > Write Your Own Review
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-21-2004, 01:09 PM
gene's Avatar
gene gene is online now
Supreme Overlord
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,955
Thanks: 218
Thanked 482 Times in 297 Posts
gene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened togene should be listened to
Default Yamaha RX-V2400

You saw our review of the RX-V2400, we would like to hear what you think. Here is the place to voice your opinion.
__________________
Gene DellaSala
President, Audioholics
Pursuing the truth in audio & video...
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 06-28-2004, 05:33 PM
Raphie Raphie is offline
Audiophyte
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Raphie is a forum member in good standing
Smile

Purchased this one 6 weeks ago. I upgraded from my Yamaha RXV- 1300. Have to say it sounds awesome. now playing around with my Pioneer 868 to find out what DAC i like better, both via coaxial (utilizing Yamaha DAC) and analoque (Pioneer DAC with 24bits upsampling) sound great. I had the same experience with the auto setup > speakers mentioned as out of phase while in phase and too much low taken away from the main speakers. So did the whole auto setup, but turned of the EQ (which i found out can be turned of by the straight function as well

Overall very happy and glad i did the upgrade
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01169 (2).JPG
Views:	571
Size:	35.8 KB
ID:	17  
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 06-28-2004, 09:12 PM
Clint DeBoer's Avatar
Clint DeBoer Clint DeBoer is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,844
Thanks: 323
Thanked 543 Times in 314 Posts
Clint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened toClint DeBoer should be listened to
Default

That setup looks so clean it should be illegal. I'm jealous.

PS. Who makes those racks?
__________________
Clint DeBoer
Editor in Chief
Audioholics
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 06-29-2004, 02:58 AM
Raphie Raphie is offline
Audiophyte
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Raphie is a forum member in good standing
Default

The cabinet is from Spectral ( www.spectral.nl ) and is brushed steel crystal glass. they have a lot of different styles and you can built your own rack from standard components as well.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 07-02-2004, 02:25 PM
Ricky Ricky is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ricky is a forum member in good standing
Smile

gene,
thanks for your valuble review. i am sure it is going to help many others out there. i myself had this reciever [borrowed from a friend of mine ] for two weeks. it sounded great with my B&W speakers. but i am still in love with my RX-Z1 and hope to upgrade it in the rear future. waiting for your Z9 review. THANKS!
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 09-08-2004, 11:37 AM
mcwilson's Avatar
mcwilson mcwilson is offline
Audioholic
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mcwilson is a forum member in good standing
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gene
You saw our review of the RX-V2400, we would like to hear what you think. Here is the place to voice your opinion.
Gene-

Thanks for the review! I found it extremely useful and will refer to it when I setup my system. I recently purchased my RXV-2400 and am waiting for my theatre room to be completed...

In your summary, you suggested abandoning "the internal amp sections for the five main channels in favor of a dedicated multi channel amp...". I am currently considering doing just that. I have a 7.1 speaker system with two JAMO D870s and a D8CEN for my front L, R, and Center channels. The front speakers are all 4 ohm speakers that can be bi-wired. Can you recommend some amps for me to check out?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 09-08-2004, 01:41 PM
tedmjr2 tedmjr2 is offline
Junior Audioholic
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chula Vista, CA
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tedmjr2 is a forum member in good standing
Default

Gene,

Thanks for your review - it's very helpful. Since the Yamaha RX-V2500 is coming out soon, I hope you can do another. I plan to wait and see if the new model applied some of your recommendations before purchasing a new AVR.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 09-17-2004, 10:24 PM
BMXTRIX's Avatar
BMXTRIX BMXTRIX is offline
Audioholic Ninja
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,009
Thanks: 101
Thanked 468 Times in 334 Posts
BMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened toBMXTRIX should be listened to
Default

I currently have a Z1 and feel that it may be overkill with my new home and may sell it and downgrade to the 2500 when it becomes available. I am really looking to maximize the use of the product by utilizing all three zones it provides and want to do a full 9.1 setup with it. But, I would love to hear more from people who have used the 2400 and what their thoughts are. Especially their complaints.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 10-20-2004, 11:44 AM
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Angry Rxv 2400

I have owned a 2400 for almost a year, and I can't wait to replace it with seperates. Before the Yamaha I had a HK 125, and overall I was much happier with the HK. Reasons I dislike my 2400 (and would never own another Yamaha):
- Poor setup menus. This goes hand in hand with a poor manual that is unclear on many setup functions.
- Inconsistant autosetup. The autosetup , which is one of the reasons I bought the Yammie, is confusing and yields innacurate and inconsistant results. I bypass the autosetup and do the calibration myself.
- Really bad 2ch performance, even in Yamaha's so called "straight" mode
- While Yamaha claims 120 WPC, it doesn't even come close to this while driving 5 or 7 speakers.
- High operating temps. I have had to send the unit back once already to have a transformer replaced. I have more than adequate ventilation for the unit.
- Very poor remote. I didn't realize how bad the remote was til I used a friends Rotel remote at his house. Lots of small, un-backlit buttons.
- No bass LFE outout in 2ch mode
- All kinds of useless DSP modes I never use.
- Overall bright sound that I like less and less every time I use the receiver. This is especially true after auditioning a few seperates.
- Only 2 component inputs. This is kind of nitpicky, because almost all AVR's and preamps don't have enough.
- The unit has been unable to decode DTS on a few DVD's. I unplugged the DVD and plugged in my 6 year old HK and it was able to read the DTS soundtracks.
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 AUDIOHOLICS, LLC