craigsub said:
Here are some in room sweeps using the QuickSweep function of TrueRTA. TrueRTA's Quicksweep takes a 1/24th octave sweep - then allows a smoothing to be applied. This is with 1/6th octave smoothing.
This is the type of response one usually gets with no eq ... in fact, most are worse.
Craig,
You shouldn't try to lie to a guy, who has spent more time with TrueRTA than it's suggested.
Those are NOT 1/24 oct. graphs using 1/6 oct. smoothing. Those are only 1/6 oct. graphs without smoothing. You can clearly count the datapoints.
How come it is so hard to show pure 1/24 oct. FR, without any smoothing or other tweaks that can make the FR look better than it is? You didn't use the old Stryke CD, did you? You guys (you and jakeman) blasted me for using only 1/24 oct. rez and not using any highrez software like LMS in my shootout, but now suddenly 1/6 oct. is okay?
Ok, here are the overlaid graphs.
HSU HO with and without the turbo:
HSU HO without turbo and SVS Ultra 16 Hz
HSU HO with turbo and SVS Ultra 16 Hz
There are pretty huge differeces between them. I'm actually really surprised that you didn't subjectively hear any large differences between them. I guess you're not that golden ear I though you'd be.
I mean 5-15 dB difference in 20-60 Hz range should be pretty audible.
It would be interesting if you could bring HSU's bump down and see how they compare after that. And please, take the new measurements using 1/24 oct. resolution without any smoothing, that's all I'm asking.