PC recording questions for noob recorder

V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
Hey guys, first post here. I don't even know if I got the right forum for this but here goes.

I want to get into recording on my PC. My initial needs are pretty simple I think. I've got a laptop, and the onboard audio-in sucks as expected. So I'm looking for a way to record from a mic to PC with best quality sound.
What product or setup might you recommend?

And if I may go a step farther. What if I wanted to have 4-channel recording (4 mics at once) and MIDI I/O as well? So if I had some friends over we could all play and record and not have it sound like we were all cramming up against one mic through an adapter to my stereo-in in the laptop? Any product recommendations? And naturally, I'm on a budget, I don't need the highest quality stuff for chart-topping sounds, but something starter that I'm not embarrassed to listen to.

If this isn't the right forum for home recording then what would be a good site to talk about this stuff?

Thanks a ton
-vig
 
jaxvon

jaxvon

Audioholic Ninja
This forum is more for home theater and such, but I don't know of a good home recording forum. Still, I'll try to help you out. You may want to check out something like this. It's not the cheapest, nor does it have 4 inputs, but it's high quality and has some software to get you going. I would think you might be able to use two of them.

If you want 4 inputs, this might be more effective. It comes with software too.

If you really feel like moving up (and don't need software), you can purchase a Mackie Onyx mixer (the 12ch one is only $529) and an add on firewire card for $400. Yeah the card is expensive, but it's compatible with any of the small format Onyx mixers.
 
jaxvon

jaxvon

Audioholic Ninja
The second item (Mobile Pre) would work better, but keep in mind it only has 2 microphone inputs and 2 instrument inputs (like guitar). Keep in mind it's only 2 channels, so you can only use two of the inputs at a time (2 mics, 2 guitars, or 1 of each). This might work for you.

You shouldn't need a digital input, as you're trying to capture analog signals. You will need some sort of software to record with too. The Mobile pre comes with this. It's not Pro Tools, but it will work.

Whether or not you need phantom power depends on the type of microphone you're using. If you're using a standard dynamic microphone (your run-of-the-mill inexpensive microphone), then you don't need phantom power. If you're using a condenser microphone (more expensive, the kind usually used in studios), then you'll need the +48v phantom power for it to work.

XLR refers to the type of connection. A standard microphone uses XLR because it supports a balanced signal. A balanced signal is better at rejectring noise over long runs than an unbalanced one. Here's some XLR plugs:



And yes, you need XLR inputs if you plan on using any normal microphone. If you ever feel like getting a nice microphone for recording (a condenser), then you might consider something like this. Keep in mind you'll need something with phantom power for it to work correctly.
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
Sweet, that tells me some more. I have a couple other questions really quick.

The 2 channel is fine, I can do that. The most I'll have (for playing around) is voice and instrument. I'm not trying to start a band or anything.

Based on what you said, I have these 2 questions.

1) For the XLR plugs, I almost always see it going from XLR(mic) to 1/4" RCA on the other end. Is this still considered XLR? Based on some findings, I don't think I can afford a device which has XLR inputs on the device itself. So what am I losing with a device using RCA jack to XLR mic?

2) When talking of mics, I see a lot of them which "block out" sounds from angles. As in, it sounds best when singing directly into it. Which makes sense for voice. But I am going to record piano as well. So obviously I can't have a mic pointed at just the middle strings. What kind of mic do I need to adequately record a piano? Which has such a wide angle of sound coming in. Cause I don't want just the highs or lows or wherever the mic is pointed. So what is technical name of a mic good for voice, and a mic good for piano?

Thanks for your help thus far!
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
Oh sorry, I just saw that the inputs of the Mobilepre IS XLR. Didn't notice that. So I guess that's a good thing.

Between those two devices I linked to, isn't the Firewire a better device? Or more high-tech or better features? Their both Maudio but also I can get either of them for the same price. The Firewire one has an MSRP about $100 more then the Pre, so wouldn't that be a better deal? Plus it looks better, and gets better coverage on MAudio's web site.
 
jaxvon

jaxvon

Audioholic Ninja
1. I'm not sure what you're getting at. Perhaps you're thinking of an adapter? Most microphones have a male XLR plug on them (as in the microphone has pins) and the input you're plugging the cable into is a female jack.

2. Yes, you're thinking of a Cardioid microphone. This refers to the shape of the polar pattern of the microphone response. A cardioid is roughly heart shaped, hence the name. You should read this to get a better understanding of microphones. It will explain placement and such. The "all over" microphone is an "omnidirectional" mic. You don't want this as it will pick up other random noise around the room.

And yes, while firewire is the better interface, the firewire device you linked is only for digital audio. It doesn't have any microphone preamps, which means it won't fulfill your goals.

Little addendum on mic'ing a piano: http://www.shure.com/shurenotes/may2003/mic.asp#pianos
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
jaxvon said:
The "all over" microphone is an "omnidirectional" mic. You don't want this as it will pick up other random noise around the room.
The highest fidellity recordings[as in most natural and realistic] that I have heard were made with omnidirectional microphones used in a mid-field distance. I personally despise traditional studio recording techniques so far as acoustic instruments and voices are concerned where everything is close-miked and fabricated using effects. However, I do like the artifical sound for pop/rock/electronic type musics. Also, I would think it should be possible to make dense acoustic foam sheilds to make an omnidirectional to be directional, though I've never seen this done.

-Chris
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
You're so cool for helping me. I've actually posted on other audio forums more suited to recording, and am not getting much help. You rock!

Ya my question was, in the "true" sence of an "XLR Mic", wouldn't that be 3 prongs(or holes) on BOTH sides of the cable? If the cable has a 3 prong plug into the mic, but is strait to a 1/4" jack on the other end, is that still XLR? Using no adapters, just 3 prong to 1/4" jack.

"And yes, while firewire is the better interface, the firewire device you linked is only for digital audio. It doesn't have any microphone preamps, which means it won't fulfill your goals."

Wow, you just saved me a pretty penny! So it would seem, then, that maybe this is my only M-Audio choice?

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/MobilePreUSB-main.html

This page has all their portable controllers: http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=products.list&ID=mobileinterfaces

Any reason why I shouldn't buy that?
Software-wise I hope the free stuff is good that it comes with, but would I be able to use any software with recording/editing features? Like Audacity and the like?

Almost done with you! lol. I'm gunna go read your links now.
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
WMAX, you posted at the same time I did, I didn't see your post.
Good point.
Reason I brought it up is that an 88key piano is so wide, a directional mic doesn't seem to fill the bill. Like you point it towards the center, and the high and low keys get the boot. A mic that picks up noise from everywhere, seems to me, would be a better choice.

But I have some reading to do on the subject...
 
jaxvon

jaxvon

Audioholic Ninja
WmAx said:
The highest fidellity recordings[as in most natural and realistic] that I have heard were made with omnidirectional microphones used in a mid-field distance. I personally despise traditional studio recording techniques so far as acoustic instruments and voices are concerned where everything is close-miked and fabricated using effects. However, I do like the artifical sound for pop/rock/electronic type musics. Also, I would think it should be possible to make dense acoustic foam sheilds to make an omnidirectional to be directional, though I've never seen this done.

-Chris
I'm inclined to agree with you here, however, from what I inferred about his purposes, he probably won't have the environment to appropriately achieve this recording style. To do this properly would also require a high-quality omni condenser mic and high quality preamp, neither of which he has right now. Not to mention the experience and know-how needed to place the microphone correctly, adjust levels, etc.
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
jaxvon said:
I'm inclined to agree with you here, however, from what I inferred about his purposes, he probably won't have the environment to appropriately achieve this recording style. To do this properly would also require a high-quality omni condenser mic and high quality preamp, neither of which he has right now. Not to mention the experience and know-how needed to place the microphone correctly, adjust levels, etc.
True, a good sounding ambient acoustic room is needed. Provided he can achieve that, a good electret type omni is sufficient, given proper recording levels to minimize noise. Behringer ECM8000 is a very popular low cost electret omni(that is usually very accurate as well) that is popular in home recording. Another possibility is PZM mics, a type of omni-directional microphone that has some directionality at about 10Khz and above. Perhaps 2 such microphones placed about 8 - 10 feet from the piano would suffice. However, in order to get a good spacing and distance that sound optimal to him, he needs access to accurate monitors and considerable time narrowing down the possibilities with good old fashioned trial and error.

-Chris
 
Last edited:
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
WmAx said:
....Behringer...
Okay, at this point, I'm recommending the B word without even realizing it.... I swear, I don't work for Behringer! They just happen to have a few products that stand above the rest so far as value is concerned. :D

-Chris
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
You guys rock! Thanks!

I looked up the Behringer ECM8000, they call it a "measurement" mic. And say things like "...allows you to carry out measurement and alignment tasks...". Is this some special purpose mic? Or can it be used for regular instrument recording?

What would be a couple more mics in the range of $30-$50. One omni (I guess) for the piano recording. And one directional for voice. Or just what else do you think would be good?

You're right, my room is not the best accoustic sounding room. It is a smaller, square room that opens up to both dining and living rooms. There is enough fabric around to absorb most noise from bouncing back, it's carpeted. So I would have to pic up sound directly from the sound board. And it is a spinet piano, so it doesn't have a great booming sound either. Although it sounds nice, I imagine I'd have to place whatever mic, pretty close to it.

Now here is another scenario: If I buy both a directional voice mic, and omnidirectional, I probably would NOT use them both at the same time. Because I don't think it would sound good as both mics pick up both sound sources. I'd use one mic and record piano, then use the other mic and record voice. UNLESS you think a single omni could pick up both voice and piano at the same time, reasonbly well. What do you think? Or if I did want to do voice and piano at the same time, would it be better to have two directional mics, to cut down on them picking up each other's sounds?

Alright, you guys have helped a lot, and so far there has been no reason not to buy the M-Audio MobilePre USB. Here are the features again:

2 x 2 USB audio interface
2 microphone inputs (XLR balanced) with 48v phantom power
Stereo microphone input (1/8 in.)
2 high-impedance instrument/line inputs (1/4 in. balanced)
2 analog outputs (unbalanced 1/4 in. @ -10dBv)
Stereo line output (1/8 in.)
Stereo headphone output (1/8 in.) with level control knob
Gain control knob for each input channel (+40 dB max)
Zero-latency hardware direct monitoring with software level control
Mono/stereo direct monitoring
USB-powered (no wall wart or batteries needed)

The mic I have now is a Radioshack dynamic 500ohm with a 1/4" jack. Which means, for playing aroud (until I can get a better mic), I would plug it into the "high-impedance instrument/line input", rather then the XLR balanced. Will this just sound like crap for recording?

If I might ask one last question before I buy the M-Audio: Since the XLR and 1/4" jacks are both balanced, does it really matter which one I use? I understand that if I get a condenser mic, I have to use the phantom power with the XLR. But all else being equal, will the XLR and 1/4" jacks give me about the same quality? How does the "high-impedance" on the 1/4" effect things?

Thanks again
Almost done!
 
jaxvon

jaxvon

Audioholic Ninja
I'm feeling a tad lazy, so I'm just going to answer the question about which jack to use. I belive the jacks used on the mobile pre for the XLR inputs also accept 1/4" plugs in the middle for microphones like you have. And no, it would NOT be a good idea to use your microphone in the instrument input, as it's designed for something with a much higher impedance. You may want to check with M-Audio on the jack compatability, but from the looks of the jack, it can be done.

I'll get back to you on the other stuff. I've got some things to attend to...
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
Ok I'll be patient.
I found this picture of both the front and back of the unit:
http://www.clubic.com/photo/00035782.jpg

So if I don't want to use my 500ohm 1/4" mic in the 1/4" jacks, can I get an adapter to plug my mic into XLR?

Maybe I need some more info on what impedance does for both mic and jack, and how they communicate. I may buy the thing this weekend, and I don't want to stick my mic in it if it's gunna hurt something.

thx
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
Vigilante said:
I looked up the Behringer ECM8000, they call it a "measurement" mic. And say things like "...allows you to carry out measurement and alignment tasks...". Is this some special purpose mic? Or can it be used for regular instrument recording?
Yes, it can be used for regular instrument recording. It's extremely linear frequency response makes it a superb choice if you want nuetral recordings. Being an electret, it is noisier than a condensor microphone, however. But the noise is not a problem if you set levels correctly and get the microphone close enough to pick up a decent SPL. Alot of the noise is not even the actual microphone, but the ambient noise picked up due to it's omnipolar response[it picks up everything from all directions uniformly, including noise in the room that would not normally be noticed].


What would be a couple more mics in the range of $30-$50. One omni (I guess) for the piano recording. And one directional for voice. Or just what else do you think would be good?
I can't recommend any other linear microphones in that range that have been proven to do an excellent job. As for standard microphones, I can't help you, as I am not a recording hobbyist; I am speaking from a measurer's perspective.

You're right, my room is not the best accoustic sounding room. It is a smaller, square room that opens up to both dining and living rooms. There is enough fabric around to absorb most noise from bouncing back, it's carpeted. So I would have to pic up sound directly from the sound board. And it is a spinet piano, so it doesn't have a great booming sound either. Although it sounds nice, I imagine I'd have to place whatever mic, pretty close to it.

Now here is another scenario: If I buy both a directional voice mic, and omnidirectional, I probably would NOT use them both at the same time. Because I don't think it would sound good as both mics pick up both sound sources. I'd use one mic and record piano, then use the other mic and record voice. UNLESS you think a single omni could pick up both voice and piano at the same time, reasonbly well.
Two or three omnis would do a great job, placed midfield, to pick up both sound sources at the same time, but it will definately pick up the character of the room which you said is not good. You might improve the acoustics of the room by placing 2 4'x8' sheets of thin plywood on the floor around and in front of the piano. Carpeted floors usually hurt the sound for an acoustic recording.
What do you think? Or if I did want to do voice and piano at the same time, would it be better to have two directional mics, to cut down on them picking up each other's sounds?
Let me sum it up: with mid-field or far-field multiple mics you have a chance to get a natural/realistic sounding recording. With near-field micing, you will get a clearer[more defined clarity and less noise] but un-natural sounding recording[I have heard some pretty good acoustic recording done this way, but they are rare and still don't sound convincing to me]. The latter is the most popular method, by far. But I'm not a fan of what's popular because it does not result in the most realistic acoustic recordings, so my advice is biased on this issue.

BTW, for a few more $$ than the M-Audio, you can get a USB device that has direct manual interface mixer controls and more flexible connections.

http://www.zzounds.com/item--BEHBCA2000

BTW, for recordings like this, don't forget to judicously apply dynamic compression for best playback quality on general playback devices.

I'll continue to answer your questions. But for the best advice, you need to find a decent home recording forum or newsgroup.

-Chris
 
Last edited:
jaxvon

jaxvon

Audioholic Ninja
Vigilante,

You might want to check out the forums over on Home Recording. They have articles and other stuff, as well as people who are far more experienced in the field than I.

http://www.homerecording.com/
 
V

Vigilante

Audioholic Intern
The homerecording site is real cool. Butt ugly and slow, but cool. I'm learning so much that I'm now out of my mind confused as all getout :)

The Behringer you mentioned looks cool. Has features I may never use, cause this is just for fun and I doubt I'll be getting much else in the way of audio equipment. Like digital recorder, compressor, effects board or whatever. I hope to do near ALL audio editing on the PC.

So based on my initial reading over there, it seems all I need is a mixer. Plain and simple. Only it's not so simple, because the mixer isn't computer connected like with USB or Firewire. Which means I'd have to have a decent sound card to take the outputs from the mixer into the PC. One product, from Yamaha, is a 10 channel mixer: http://www.zzounds.com/item--YAMMG102. It has the 2 mic inputs as well as others. But not direct PC connection. At the same time, it's cheap. And assuming I have a good sound card, can it get me good recordings?

Say you were to compare a general mixer like this, from whoever, to the M-Audio, or any USB/Firewire device; are they pretty much the same, only one adds USB/Firewire instead of making you use normal audio cables output to input?

Only I have to be careful with mixers, because their meant to take input from another device, like a tape recorder or other "line" output. As I found a Behringer but the 10 channels were "line" level inputs, and the web site says you ONLY want to plug LINE outputs to LINE inputs and viceversa. A microphone/keyboard/guitar/vocal from a mic or jack would not technically be a line level output. But this Yamaha as 2 regular mic jacks with phantum power etc.. Although they call it "2 microphone/line inputs..."
There now you see why this is so confusing? How can it be both a mic and line input? If line inputs should only be connected to line outputs?

Sorry that I'm such a nut, I type all this for my own good, as it helps sort things out for me while I write about it. I still have much to learn.

Now that brings me back to another issue. Because I want to do all the effects and editing on the PC, why would I need a mixer? I would have no need to change pan or EQ or effects or even levels. I can do all that in the PC. So a mixer with 10 knobs per channel also seems overkill.
In the truest sense, all I need is a mic preamp and then lineout the signal to my linein on the soundcard. But since I want 2 channels or more, that becomes a mixer. But since I don't need the onboard effects, the USB connected devices are simpler in design, but can cost more then a small mixer.

If I wanted all effects onboard, I would probably shell out for a 4 track recorder instead and a mixer. Right? Not really computer controlled, but could be. And I could still have a lot of fun recording 4 tracks. But those recoders get up in price. And somehow the thought of recording to ancient tapes seems less then decent quality. So around my thoughts go to recording to PC again.

I guess what I'm wondering now is, so far in my knowledge, I just need a good mic preamp. Not many effects, EQ, or levels onboard, and a computer connection. This leads me back to the M-Audio again, like a bad penny. Because it gives me the balanced XLR mic inputs and guitar inputs, with phantom if needed. Has USB connection so I don't have to pass the audio through subpar sound card.

So once again. Well lets say this, pit the M-Audio against a plain-jane mixer/preamp. Benefits to using either?
Pit the M-Audio against the aforementioned Behringer USB device. Would you say the Behringer has 'everything' the M-Audio does, only more, and better quality? Or are there features of both I should consider?

I will register at their forums, but let's conclude our lovely coversation over here first, and then I'll refer back to this thread while over there.

You've all been great!
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top