Search results

Ended up upgrading my TX-RZ1100 to the TX-RZ70 and while I would've preferred to continue with the class D platform, this amp seemed to have a very nice feature-set for the price. Local retailer offered me a nice deal where they gave me just 470 euros less for the 1100 than I originally paid for...

As a long time pioneer class D3 user, I'd say their way of specifying total output power is pretty nice aswell. They guarantee the of total output regardless of channels driven (limited by the per channel spec aswell naturally); for example for the SC-LX904 it is 880W.

I waited for gene to test one these pioneer d3 based receivers to see how they perform on the bench, but as it appears that it is never going to happen, I thought I share one that I found online that has full bw tests of the class d3 amplifiers...

I gave you that marantz combos measurement as reference; it is rated at 8 ohm, full bw at 150W per channel... so, if the 1khz at 6 ohm load would be much less taxing, the marantz should have given way more output. But it doesn't. From what I understand, while full bw is more taxing, the...

Pioneer actually DOES tell you how much power you can get out of their receivers all channels driven. For 901 it is 850W, 801 810W and 701 760W (and atleast with previous generations these have held true in measurements quite well with all load impendances). And complaining about that additional...

Just wanted to leave these here to show that while onkyos power ratings are inflated (as with majority of receivers), the thing does output some serious power; and beating out even marantzs av8802/mm8077 combo, atleast based on this data measured by audiovision.de. And to point out, I've...