There is a speaker for everyone. It does not matter one bit if it happens to be ID or BM or hybrid.
admin should be listened to
When shopping loudspeakers do you prefer Internet Direct or traditional Brick&Mortar brands? We give you a tour of the pros/cons of each.
Discuss "Speaker Manufacturers: Internet Direct vs Brick and Mortar" here. Read the article.
Last edited by gene; 03-04-2013 at 12:21 PM.
There is a speaker for everyone. It does not matter one bit if it happens to be ID or BM or hybrid.
REVEL SALON2 . B&W 802D2 . KEF 201/2 (6) . LINKWITZ ORION3 . TAD 2201 . DYNAUDIO X32 . FOCAL 826V . ATC SCM7 . PHILHARMONIC 3 . FUNK 18.0 (2) . RBH SX-1010N (2) . VELODYNE SC600 (4) . PIONEER MM301 (8) . DENON AVP-A1HD/AVR-5308/AVR-3312/DVD-3800BD . ATI 3005/3002/2004/6012 . BENQ W6000 . ADCOM GFS-600 . APPLE TV . KIMBER KABLE 8PR
My System Photo . My System Video
JonnyFive23517 is gaining some recognition
I have always been a fan of the internet direct business model, so I support ID businesses whenever possible. I think an interesting study would be: given a fixed price for a pair of speakers where does the money you spent go? My guess would be that for ID brands, a significantly higher portion of the money goes into quality parts/product research whereas for B&M that same money gets sucked up in overhead for real estate, distribution, and salespeoples' salaries. But that's just my guess, based on my own ID experience within the reptile industry.
Casey01 is off the scale
One of the strengths of a B&M retailer pointed out in the comments is also one of its biggest weaknesses. Retailers usually sell many brands and from my own experience over the years they tend to formulate agendas whereby they will end up pushing certain brands over others because of discounts from the manufacturers and hence, because of this, generate larger profit margins in the process. There is also the issue of knowledge of the salesperson which more often then not, is quite lacking, especially, when it comes to objectivity in the eyes of the potential consumer.
For the above and many other logical reasons, it is no accident that more and more CE companies, especially with speakers, are going the ID route and as we can see, in recent years, because of it, much of the retail B&M business is in trouble. Like many others, I have listened to speakers in a store, taken them home, only to return them later because I didn't like the way they sounded. Many retailers normally won't even allow this to begin with and if they do, it is usually an exchange, not a money back set-up. ID companies usually have complete 30 day return policies which usually negates the issue of listening to the speakers before hand and even if one has to pay the return shipping, it is still more advantageous than being stuck with a product a buyer doesn't want.
There are many well established, quality companies out there that sell strictly the ID method and when it comes to a wide variety of choices, it really shouldn't even be an issue. Your ID buyer, especially in this case, is usually a better informed, more educated buyer anyway.
SaviorMachine is gaining some recognition
Wow, calling out Velodyne directly. Hm.
I don't care as long as the price is right, the dealer is an authorized dealer of the product and the warranty is valid and there is a 30 day return policy.
#1 Vincent Sp-331mkII amp, ATI 2002, Quicksilver's Mid Mono amplifier(2), Wyred for Sound STP-SE, (pre-amp), Rogue 99 Pre-amp, Jolida JD-9A, Micro Seiki bl-91, Kef 104.2, Usher be718, Rega Apollo, Sony xA5400ES, #2 Win7, Synology DS413 NAS w/Seagate 4 -2TB HHD, JRiver17, EE DAC Plus, Mytek DSD DAC, Genelec 8030A,Kef140
: #3 HT; Denon 4311Ci,GE Triton 2's, Sat50C, Sat3's, Rythmik D15se, OPPO-95,
Irvrobinson should be listened to
I normally like these AH articles, but I'm not understanding the tone or the point of this one. It seems more like a rant.
KEW should be listened to
AcuDefTechGuy (02-14-2013)
AcuDefTechGuy (02-14-2013),KEW (02-14-2013)
Cliff_is should be listened to