Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Comb Filtering, Acoustical Interference, & Power Response in Loudspeakers

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Comb Filtering, Acoustical Interference, & Power Response in Loudspeakers

    Comb Filtering and Acoustical Interference are two audio terms that relate to the manner in which two or more sound sources (such as two separate speakers or two drivers within a single speaker system) interact and affect each other. The importance and audibility of these phenomena are the subject of this article, and they are a source of a continuing difference of opinion among well-respected equipment designers and acoustic theorists/researchers. Dealing with potential acoustical interference issues of multiple drivers in the same loudspeaker cabinet is something any serious designer should be concerned about and not just brushed off as a measurement artifact that doesn't have real world implications.


    Discuss "Comb Filtering, Acoustical Interference, & Power Response in Loudspeakers" here. Read the article.
    Last edited by gene; 09-03-2012 at 11:24 PM.

  2. #2
    shadyJ is online now Audioholic General shadyJ is off the scale
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,423
    Thanks Given
    101
    Thanks Received
    439

    Default

    I'll admit to not understanding all of the article, but it was interesting nonetheless. I would assume line arrays work by having so much cancellation and reinforcement that it becomes a relatively flat frequency response and the combing effect is smeared out by averaging all the signals produced by all the drivers. Do line arrays have the acoustic interference in the vertical plane? If so, why couldn't that also be remedied by using a grid of drivers instead of just a line? I never see that- 'grid arrays'.

  3. #3
    gene's Avatar
    gene is online now Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,818
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shadyJ View Post
    I'll admit to not understanding all of the article, but it was interesting nonetheless. I would assume line arrays work by having so much cancellation and reinforcement that it becomes a relatively flat frequency response and the combing effect is smeared out by averaging all the signals produced by all the drivers. Do line arrays have the acoustic interference in the vertical plane? If so, why couldn't that also be remedied by using a grid of drivers instead of just a line? I never see that- 'grid arrays'.
    Yes you pretty much got it. Line Arrays have interference in the vertical plane which designers try to minimize by narrowing the beam width vertically.
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  4. #4
    Gordonj's Avatar
    Gordonj is offline Full Audioholic Gordonj has very reliable input
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    250
    Thanks Given
    101
    Thanks Received
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gene View Post
    Yes you pretty much got it. Line Arrays have interference in the vertical plane which designers try to minimize by narrowing the beam width vertically.
    The interpretation of Line Array speaker clusters is a different topic then the comb filtering article. The effect of using line array design approaches by 1/4 and 1/2 wave formulas allows for the reduction of the inverse square law. With traditional speaker approaches the Inverse Square Law is that every doubling of distance reduce the level by 6dB. With the use of Line Array design approaches that doubling of distance is now only a 3dB of reduction in volume. Further, 1/4 and 1/2 wave combining, that occurs at the cluster location, allows for directional control down to much lower freqs. then "traditional speaker clusters" due to the "creation" of one line source driver (the longer the cluster in boxes/height the lower the overall frequency control.)

    Gordon

  5. #5
    agarwalro's Avatar
    agarwalro is online now Audioholic Samurai agarwalro should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks Given
    932
    Thanks Received
    613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gene, from article
    on the topic of comb filtering. Some engineers use this term interchangeably with acoustical interference implying the audible effects of comb filtering between a pair of speakers playing in a room is similar to multiple high frequency drivers spaced further apart than their common wavelengths of operation in the same cabinet.
    Must be the same "engineers" who use speaker sensitivity/ efficiency or phase/time aligned as interchangeable terms.

    Acoustic interference is a physical phenomenon resulting from interaction of sound waves moving in air, whereas comb filtering is an electrical phenomenon resulting from summing a signal with a delayed version of itself. Acoustical interference of single frequencies under controlled conditions can be made to graphically look similar to a comb filters' response. To be fair, in an ABX test the physical and electrical outcomes may be audibly indistinguishable.

    In a real life listening scenario, the acoustic interference, like room modes and floor/ceiling/wall bounce will swamp out all but the most egregious electrical errors, like incorrect polarity between drivers and amp clipping.
    Home Office: Behringer 1030A, SVS PB-12 Ultra, measured. Comfy Room: PS3, Sennheiser RS120, Samsung UN46B8500. On the Go: Sansa Clip lost , Etymotic ER-6i commandeered by wife!

  6. #6
    MinusTheBear's Avatar
    MinusTheBear is offline Audioholic Ninja MinusTheBear should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,506
    Thanks Given
    1,133
    Thanks Received
    863

    Default

    Is it a far assumption that the difference between acoustical interference occurring within the driver layout of a loudspeaker will ALWAYS share the same signal and amplitude while listening to a pair of speakers in stereo, the Left/Right speaker might not always share the same signal and/or amplitude. You talked about two sound sources sharing the same signal, say you change the amplitude of the one sound source, what implications does this have on comb filtering and/or acoustical interference?

  7. #7
    Beatmatcher247 is online now Full Audioholic Beatmatcher247 is looking for a job at AH
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bismarck
    Posts
    276
    Thanks Given
    58
    Thanks Received
    32

    Default

    A while back, I asked about adding another set of Synchrony One towers to the front would be and was advised against it because of comb filtering. I don't understand that much about it, but would the following setup sound like a disjointed mess because of comb filtering?

    PSB Synchrony 1 Towers (flr)
    PSB Synchrony 1 C (center)
    PSB Synchrony 1 B (rear)
    (2) JL Audio F113
    Parasound New Classic 5250 V.2
    Marantz AV7005
    Cambridge 650BD
    65" Panasonic VT50
    Gaming/HTPC: I72600k oc'd 5.0 GhZ, 16 GB 1600 DDR3, 240 GB Crucial SSD, (2) Powercolor Radeon 6970's Crossfired, (1) 3TB HDD for .flac storage

  8. #8
    Beatmatcher247 is online now Full Audioholic Beatmatcher247 is looking for a job at AH
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bismarck
    Posts
    276
    Thanks Given
    58
    Thanks Received
    32

    Default

    Sorry it didn't link in the post above.

    PSB Synchrony 1 Towers (flr)
    PSB Synchrony 1 C (center)
    PSB Synchrony 1 B (rear)
    (2) JL Audio F113
    Parasound New Classic 5250 V.2
    Marantz AV7005
    Cambridge 650BD
    65" Panasonic VT50
    Gaming/HTPC: I72600k oc'd 5.0 GhZ, 16 GB 1600 DDR3, 240 GB Crucial SSD, (2) Powercolor Radeon 6970's Crossfired, (1) 3TB HDD for .flac storage

  9. #9
    gotchaforce is offline Junior Audioholic gotchaforce is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    20

    Default

    Heh, no attention given to this article because it flies over most peoples heads.

    It was explained VERY well most people just dont have the patience to take it in.

    They rather talk about how pretty speaker with horrible headroom and power response measurements compares to the other pretty speaker with horrible headroom and power response measurements.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to gotchaforce For This Useful Post:

    monkish54 (11-29-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •