Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Polk Audio LSiM 707 Flagship Floorstanding Speakers First Look

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Polk Audio LSiM 707 Flagship Floorstanding Speakers First Look

    You put two words together in the same sentence and you are guaranteed to get every Audioholic's attention. Those words - Flagship and Speaker. For almost ten years Polk Audio has had the LSi line as their flagship speakers. This year, at CES, they are introducing a new flagship, the LSiM, headed up by their 707 towers. While pricing hasn't yet been announced, they sport a proprietary 3.25" Extended Liner Motion (ELM) midrange mounted above a 1" Advance Isotropic ring radiator tweeter plus a 6.5" ELM midrange and two 6x9" ELM "subwoofers" (or what you and I would call "woofers"). They are a four way ported design that has 40 years of audio technology behind them. Plus, they are so much better looking than the old LSi speakers we don't know where to begin. Talk about hot. Now, if only we could get them on our test bench.


    Discuss "Polk Audio LSiM 707 Flagship Floorstanding Speakers First Look" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    kevon27 is offline Annoying Poster kevon27 is off the scale
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    91
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    5

    Default

    I think Audioholics should put in for a review sample from Polk as soon as these speakers are released.

  3. #3
    jinjuku's Avatar
    jinjuku is online now Moderator jinjuku should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    4,174
    Thanks Given
    613
    Thanks Received
    1,408

    Default

    LSiM 707 Tower Speaker ($1,999 each)
    LSiM 705 Tower Speaker ($1,499 each)
    LSiM 703 Bookshelf Speaker ($1,099 each)
    LSiM 706c Center Channel Speaker ($1,099 each)
    LSiM 704c Center Channel Speaker ($699 each)
    LSiM 702f/x Bipolar Surround Speaker ($749 each)
    HT: L-C-R Zaph ZDT3.5's | AVR: Denon 4308Ci | Source: HTPC (Radeon 5k series - AMD Sempron 140 - 4TB server) | Sub:Infinity Reference Dual Opposed | Behringer iNuke 3K-DSP

    2.0: Mission Statements | Amp: Crown XLS402D | Source: AMD Brazos CPU | 96GB SSD | 4GB | Win7 x64 | E-Mu 1212m PCIe | Tripplite PR-10 DC Power Supply | Mini-box DC to DC ATX

  4. #4
    bwilberg266 is offline Audioholic Intern bwilberg266 is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    25
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    These look eerily similar to Goldenear Technology's Triton Two Towers

    Sandy Gross has left a legacy with Polk and Definitive, but seems to be creating a new one with Goldenear. For my money I'd say I'd go with the Triton's for $1,250 each vs the LSiM 707 price tag of $1,999 a piece.
    Main Setup
    Fronts - Energy RC-50's
    Center - Energy RC-LCR
    Rear - Energy RC-R's
    Sub - ED A2-300
    AVR - Pioneer SC-37
    Blu-Ray - Sony PS3 Slim
    TV - Panasonic TC-P42GT25
    Media Server - Mac Mini

  5. #5
    ohskigod is offline Junior Audioholic ohskigod has a small fan club
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    73
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwilberg266 View Post
    These look eerily similar to Goldenear Technology's Triton Two Towers

    Sandy Gross has left a legacy with Polk and Definitive, but seems to be creating a new one with Goldenear. For my money I'd say I'd go with the Triton's for $1,250 each vs the LSiM 707 price tag of $1,999 a piece.

    If by "Similar" you mean not even in the same ballpark, then sure. they are very similar (??)

    http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/s...-triton-two-fl


    Incidentally I heard the 707's at prototype of these at my house (cabinets finished but the crossover was not the final version), they sounded pretty frikkin good. Also, we all know MSRP does not equal what they will be priced at retail most times, so price comparos should be taken with a grain fo salt at this point.

    Incidentally, I admit I never heard the Goldenear, it might sound brilliant for all I know, but I wont make a reccomendation if i havent heard both speakers. It's just how I roll I guess.
    Red Chicklets for the WIN

  6. #6
    mardelgo is offline Junior Audioholic mardelgo is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    71
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    15

    Default

    The towers look that they have a very good desing. If you look the inside of the cabinet each driver has his own "cabinet" and the drivers look very high quality.



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

  7. #7
    bwilberg266 is offline Audioholic Intern bwilberg266 is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    25
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ohskigod View Post
    If by "Similar" you mean not even in the same ballpark, then sure. they are very similar (??)

    http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/s...-triton-two-fl
    Ease up on the hair trigger there. The similarity of the look is what I was referencing when looking at the construct of the cabinet and drivers. I should have done a better job clarifying that. And the reason I brought it up is that the design engineering looks very similar and I find it interesting that Sandy is the father of Polk and is now making the Golden Ear speakers that seem (to me at least) to look similar in structure.

    I happen to like the old Polk stuff a lot more than the new stuff, and seeing that he's the man that started it all, I have more loyalty to the man behind the sound than the name on the front of the cabinet.

    Last edited by bwilberg266; 01-05-2011 at 03:51 PM.
    Main Setup
    Fronts - Energy RC-50's
    Center - Energy RC-LCR
    Rear - Energy RC-R's
    Sub - ED A2-300
    AVR - Pioneer SC-37
    Blu-Ray - Sony PS3 Slim
    TV - Panasonic TC-P42GT25
    Media Server - Mac Mini

  8. #8
    jinjuku's Avatar
    jinjuku is online now Moderator jinjuku should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    4,174
    Thanks Given
    613
    Thanks Received
    1,408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwilberg266 View Post
    Ease up on the hair trigger there. The similarity of the look is what I was referencing when looking at the construct of the cabinet and drivers. I should have done a better job clarifying that. And the reason I brought it up is that the design engineering looks very similar and I find it interesting that Sandy is the father of Polk and is now making the Golden Ear speakers that seem (to me at least) to look similar in structure.

    I happen to like the old Polk stuff a lot more than the new stuff, and seeing that he's the man that started it all, I have more loyalty to the man behind the sound than the name on the front of the cabinet.

    Definitely kissing cousins but the Polk is a lot better looking. Keep the grill on the Triton.
    HT: L-C-R Zaph ZDT3.5's | AVR: Denon 4308Ci | Source: HTPC (Radeon 5k series - AMD Sempron 140 - 4TB server) | Sub:Infinity Reference Dual Opposed | Behringer iNuke 3K-DSP

    2.0: Mission Statements | Amp: Crown XLS402D | Source: AMD Brazos CPU | 96GB SSD | 4GB | Win7 x64 | E-Mu 1212m PCIe | Tripplite PR-10 DC Power Supply | Mini-box DC to DC ATX

  9. #9
    Bass Bum is offline Audioholic Intern Bass Bum is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Under a bridge.
    Posts
    26
    Thanks Given
    11
    Thanks Received
    6

    Default

    Can someone explain to me the oblong, oval shaped sub-drivers? Are they in this shape in order to get a larger woofer into a narrow cabinet? Any downside to them over the traditional round woofer?

  10. #10
    j_garcia's Avatar
    j_garcia is offline Seriously, I have no life. j_garcia should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    San Jose, Ca.
    Posts
    21,295
    Thanks Given
    1,666
    Thanks Received
    3,807

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bass Bum View Post
    Can someone explain to me the oblong, oval shaped sub-drivers? Are they in this shape in order to get a larger woofer into a narrow cabinet? Any downside to them over the traditional round woofer?
    6x9 and even 4x10 drivers have been around for MANY years in car audio. Yes, it is for space consideration.
    HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, 3X GR Research A/V-2s, GR A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-83SE, URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100, PS3 Slim120G(500G) Bluejeans Cable
    System Two: Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G), My HT


    Are you sure which side of the glass you are on?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •