Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Snell LCR7 XL 30th Anniversary Bookshelf Speaker

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Snell LCR7 XL 30th Anniversary Bookshelf Speaker

    The LCR7 XLs are one of their premier speakers that feature a design by Snell Chief Engineer Joe D’Appolito memorializing the 30th anniversary of Snell Acoustics. Utilizing a D'Appolito array (or Mid-Tweet-Mid, MTM for short, design) and the renown SEAS XL drivers, the LCR7 XL represent the pinnacle of what you can achieve through components and experience. At $6000 a pair, they certainly seem to be sparing no expense. Performance-wise, they are tops with a fantastically clear high end and nearly limitless power handling. These are speakers you can drive practically until your amp gives out since they seem to have no real upper limit.


    Discuss "Snell LCR7 XL 30th Anniversary Bookshelf Speaker" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    cwall99's Avatar
    cwall99 is offline Full Audioholic cwall99 is off the scale
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    312
    Thanks Given
    10
    Thanks Received
    43

    Default

    Sweet review. If only I had the money....

    If I had the money, I could probably also buy me some of them $4K power cords for some amps to drive these.

    Still, it's nice to see that despite the current economy, someone's still out there pushing the edge with their products.

    The worst thing about reading speaker reviews is having to imagine what the speakers sound like. We all know that. Still, they say that the key to reading movie reviews is to find a reviewer whose tastes seem similar to yours, and then to go by what that reviewer says. I think you sort of have to do the same with speaker reviews.

    Since Tom's reviews address many of the things I like... well, you see where I'm going.

    Man, it'd be nice to give these a listen. I always feel a bit guilty when I go into a place that sells high quality gear just to listen. Still, if the place is empty, where's the harm? Okay, other than in getting the sales person's hopes up. I'm lucky in that I have a local shop where they know me and will chat with me about stuff.... hmmmmm, I'm digressing.

    Thanks for the review.
    Pioneer Elite VSX-82TXS, Pioneer Elite BDP-62FD, B&W 603 s3, B&W LCR 600, NHT 1.3A, Panasonic Viera TC-P50G20, Earthquake Super Nova MKV-15

  3. #3
    FirstReflection is online now Audioholic General FirstReflection should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,237
    Thanks Given
    68
    Thanks Received
    812

    Default

    I find this review very interesting because it demonstrates how the most common objective measurement - frequency response - does not tell the whole story!

    These days, there are many many speakers that measure with flat frequency response, both on and off axis, but the subjective listening detailed in this review makes it clear that similarly flat frequency response does not mean that two different speakers will sound the same.

    It does seem as though a near-complete lack of distortion plays a big role in the clarity and fidelity of the sound though. Less expensive - or more accurately, less well-engineered - drivers (the tweeters and woofers) may offer flat frequency response, but higher distortion, and this could account for a large portion of the audible difference in clarity.

    Naturally, one wonders if it is possible to have this same level of clarity, but at a lower price! It is certainly nice to know what is possible in terms of sound quality, but for many people, $6000/pair will not be affordable.

    Personally, I have no issue with very limited output below 80Hz. I am a believer in using a subwoofer with ALL speakers and utilizing the 80Hz cross-over with 4th order slopes. For my tastes, too many reviewers focus on speakers' bass response and imply that a speaker that can play lower is somehow better or, at least, a better value. I, personally, see very little value in a speaker being able to produce bass frequencies that, due to room interactions, will only muddy the final sound and would be much better handled by handing them off to a pair of capable subwoofers.

    To finalize, if these Snell XL speakers are able to noticably outperform speakers such as the RBH TK and Salk SongTowers in terms of clarity and distortion-free output, one wonders what it would take to match the Snell's level of quality, but at a more affordable price. I am keen to know how the Status Acoustics (RBH) Decimo bookshelf speakers would compare as they are similarly lauded for their clarity and detail, but come in at just under half the price!

  4. #4
    cwall99's Avatar
    cwall99 is offline Full Audioholic cwall99 is off the scale
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    312
    Thanks Given
    10
    Thanks Received
    43

    Default

    You make a good point. I'm not sure where it was I was reading this (but it was probably somewhere on this board), but very recently, I recall reading something about how if you can build a speaker that's more accurate in terms of a flat frequency response, more dynamic (more range from quiet to loud passages), and there was one other variable, but these were all things that you could measure objectively or empirically, then you'd probably have a speaker that would do well on subjective listening tests.

    But, according to whatever it was I read, you couldn't necessarily go in the opposite direction. In other words, not all speakers that sound good test well, but speakers that test well tend to sound better.

    While having good specs on these three variables isn't a guarantee of a superior sound speaker, having good specs increases your odds of creating a speaker people like tremendously.

    Then there was a link to a book called Sound Reproduction: The Acoustics and Psychoacoustics of Loudspeakers and Rooms by Floyd Toole in which he expounded on this much more eloquently (and I'm sure accurately) than I can.
    Pioneer Elite VSX-82TXS, Pioneer Elite BDP-62FD, B&W 603 s3, B&W LCR 600, NHT 1.3A, Panasonic Viera TC-P50G20, Earthquake Super Nova MKV-15

  5. #5
    gene's Avatar
    gene is offline Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,819
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    I am keen to know how the Status Acoustics (RBH) Decimo bookshelf speakers would compare as they are similarly lauded for their clarity and detail, but come in at just under half the price!
    You and me both brother. To date I haven't found a more transparent speaker than the Decimo. Its too bad Tom lives so far from me else I'd be there with my Decimos in a heart beat.
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  6. #6
    FirstReflection is online now Audioholic General FirstReflection should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,237
    Thanks Given
    68
    Thanks Received
    812

    Default

    I'm not sure how long Snell would be willing to let Tom keep the LCR7 XL, but I would love, Love, LOVE to read a "> $2500/pair bookshelf speaker shootout"!

    I'm thinking something like a Paradigm Signature S4 would make for a good sample from a large, mass production company and its Be tweeter might make for an interesting review as well.

    And then, maybe something from an internet direct company, maybe a ribbon tweeter design like the Salk Veracity HT1?

    Put those up against the Decimo and the Snell and I think it would make for one heck of a shootout!

    Also, from my own personal interest, I love it when significantly less expensive speakers (just 1 or 2) are also included - just as a juxtaposition and to see "how close" the less expensive speakers can get! Maybe throw something like a SVSound MBS-01 into the mix, just to demonstrate what (if any) difference that extra $1500+ gets you!

  7. #7
    ned
    ned is offline Full Audioholic ned is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    352
    Thanks Given
    33
    Thanks Received
    8

    Default

    It looks like they're comparable with the RBH 661 SER.
    Front: NOW RBH 1266 SER, 661 LSE modified, 61 LSE, 441 se, 641 se
    Rears: RBH 66se, 41se
    SUB: SVS, Emo

  8. #8
    Kitsum is offline Awaiting Registration Conf Kitsum is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    50
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanks Received
    6

    Default

    This speaker is very similar (same drivers, MTM) to the highly regarded Seas Froy MkIII , available for the last 9 years as DIY or as a kit for $1.7K.
    In this case, not being able to put a kit together will cost you $4.3K.
    Last edited by Kitsum; 06-30-2009 at 02:52 PM.

  9. #9
    gliz's Avatar
    gliz is offline Full Audioholic gliz has a small fan club
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    dallas
    Posts
    284
    Thanks Given
    57
    Thanks Received
    28

    Default

    even if I had the money I would neve spend 6 grand on speakers this size drivers this size can only do so mucn, hut mu 2 cents
    "A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." -- Gerald Rudolph Ford

  10. #10
    jamie2112's Avatar
    jamie2112 is offline Audioholic Warlord jamie2112 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    in a bong
    Posts
    7,869
    Thanks Given
    3,099
    Thanks Received
    2,557

    Default

    Way overpriced IMO...............no thanks now the Decimo I would love to hear..Gene where are you I am coming to listen.....

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to jamie2112 For This Useful Post:

    lsiberian (06-30-2009)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •