Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Monitor Audio vs Mission vs Polk

  1. #1
    coolioo is offline Enthusiast coolioo is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    14
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default Monitor Audio vs Mission vs Polk

    Hello guys. I have recently aquired a new Onkyo 605 receiver. Now I would like to complete my HT setup by aquiring a 5.0 speaker set. A sub will be added later.
    Unfortunately, because of my limited budget and because of the limited speaker availability to the merchant i'm limited at the following 3 speaker sets:

    Monitor Audio set:
    Fronts: BR 2
    Sattelites: BR 1
    Center: BR LCR

    Mission set:
    Fronts: Mission M34i
    Sattelites: Mission M31i
    Cener : Mission M32i

    Polk Audio set:
    Front :Monitor 50
    Sattelites : Monitor 30
    Center : CS1

    Please note that I can't go to listen them because the merchant is at 200 km away.

    Could someone please help me to decide which speaker set to buy?

    Thanks,
    Daniel

  2. #2
    mike c's Avatar
    mike c is offline Audioholic Warlord mike c should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    9,239
    Thanks Given
    1,560
    Thanks Received
    1,950

    Default

    Monitor Audio BR versus Polk Audio Monitor series = IMO, Monitor Audio

    i've A/B'ed the Monitor Audio BR2 and Polk Audio RTi4 (btw, Polk Rti over Polk Monitor series hands down)

    Monitor Audio Bronze Reference BR2

    you will see with my a/b results that choosing between the two is purely subjective, meaning i have some songs i prefer the polk and some songs i prefer the monitor audio br series

    bummer is, we can't decide for you ... we might have totally different tastes.

  3. #3
    coolioo is offline Enthusiast coolioo is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    14
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Maybe this can help you: I will use the speakers for especially :

    - movies with Dobly and DTS tracks including the latest TrueHD
    - music : rock, and 80's

  4. #4
    mike c's Avatar
    mike c is offline Audioholic Warlord mike c should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    9,239
    Thanks Given
    1,560
    Thanks Received
    1,950

    Default

    again, this is MY opinion, your mileage may vary.

    i would go for the MA's over the Polks for these reasons:
    -the MA's are warmer = good for rock and new wave 80's
    -the MA's have great build quality
    -the Polk Monitors have a lot of bad reviews even on the Polk Audio website (the Rti series is just way better) [i was able to a/b the monitors and rti's at fry's sanfo i think]

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to mike c For This Useful Post:

    coolioo (04-23-2008)

  6. #5
    coolioo is offline Enthusiast coolioo is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    14
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Thanks for your opinion. I'm must admit that I'm a newbie in this area. This would be my first set of quality speakers.
    May I ask what is your opinion about the Missions as well ?

    I don't know if you have noticed but those Missions fronts are standfloors while the MA's are bookshelfs. I don't know if this really matters from the perspective of sound quality.

  7. #6
    mike c's Avatar
    mike c is offline Audioholic Warlord mike c should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    9,239
    Thanks Given
    1,560
    Thanks Received
    1,950

    Default

    unfortunately, i have never heard mission speakers.

    IMO, crappy floorstander vs. quality bookshelf = quality wins. i'm not saying the polk floorstander is crappy ... but size and number of drivers have nothing to do with the SQ, I learned this when I was comparing the Monitor 40 and the Rti4, and yes i noticed that the polks were floorstanders when i was thinking why you weren't comparing BR's to Rti's.

  8. #7
    rnatalli is offline Audioholic Ninja rnatalli should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,245
    Thanks Given
    377
    Thanks Received
    679

    Default

    I have the Monitor Audio BR2's which I'm selling so I can upgrade to the Silvers which cost substantially more. If you're interested in the MA's, let me know as I'll let them go for a good price. They're only like 5 months old.

  9. #8
    coolioo is offline Enthusiast coolioo is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    14
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Thanks for your offer but I leave in Romania.

  10. #9
    rnatalli is offline Audioholic Ninja rnatalli should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,245
    Thanks Given
    377
    Thanks Received
    679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coolioo View Post
    Thanks for your offer but I leave in Romania.
    Ah, ok. Personally, I'd take MA (obviously since I own them) over Mission and Polk. Mission speakers are great too, but won't have the detail of MA. Never liked Polk.

  11. #10
    coolioo is offline Enthusiast coolioo is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    14
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Hello. Based on reviews from other forums as well , I will buy the MA set but with a B&W ASW 300 sub.

    Thanks for your help.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •