Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Stax vs Audeze

  1. #1
    Boerd is offline Full Audioholic Boerd is considered a mentor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    416
    Thanks Given
    211
    Thanks Received
    68

    Default Stax vs Audeze

    I have a Beyer Manufaktur 880 (32 ohms) driven by a Benchmark HDR.
    They are very good. I am very pleased with them.
    In my opinion any dynamic headphone would be an incremental improvement (if any).
    But, upgraditis kicks in once in a while

    Are electrostatic/orthodynamic headphones worth the money?
    Is one of them better?

    Cons:
    Stax are not mobile - you're tied to a bulky amp.
    Durability is a question mark for both (???). The membrane is in both cases microns - isn't that fragile?
    Manufacturing consistence - I've seen measurements on both that are way worse than others ...
    Check this for measurements Headphone Data Sheet Downloads | InnerFidelity

    Pros:
    The measurements between 20-200 Hz region look better than the measurements of any dynamic headphones.
    In general they measure very well.

    I'd like to hear your opinion. Are the planars worth the hype and money?

  2. #2
    TLS Guy's Avatar
    TLS Guy is offline Audioholic Warlord TLS Guy should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Benedict MN
    Posts
    9,876
    Thanks Given
    865
    Thanks Received
    4,017

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boerd View Post
    I have a Beyer Manufaktur 880 (32 ohms) driven by a Benchmark HDR.
    They are very good. I am very pleased with them.
    In my opinion any dynamic headphone would be an incremental improvement (if any).
    But, upgraditis kicks in once in a while

    Are electrostatic/orthodynamic headphones worth the money?
    Is one of them better?

    Cons:
    Stax are not mobile - you're tied to a bulky amp.
    Durability is a question mark for both (???). The membrane is in both cases microns - isn't that fragile?
    Manufacturing consistence - I've seen measurements on both that are way worse than others ...
    Check this for measurements Headphone Data Sheet Downloads | InnerFidelity

    Pros:
    The measurements between 20-200 Hz region look better than the measurements of any dynamic headphones.
    In general they measure very well.

    I'd like to hear your opinion. Are the planars worth the hype and money?
    Stax have been at this a long time and are the gold standard. I know that are not mobile. They are basically aimed at the high end professional market. I Have heard the Stax over the years and their electrostatic phones are head and shoulders over the dynamic types in my view. I'm not sure headphone measurement mean much, certainly a heck of a lot less then loudspeaker measurements.

    As long as the driving device has a voltage limiter the phones will be durable. I have not heard of reliability issues with Stax phones.
    Marantz DV 9600 Oppo BD-83 Marantz AV 8003 Quad current dumping amps X 7 Direct TV HD 20 HD DVR Carter audio workstation RME Fireface 800 Fujitsu 50XHA40 Front left and right Carter dual transmission line studio monitors MK II. Center Carter coaxial transmission line center speaker Rear Carter NFM-1s Center backs Carter dual transmission line studio monitors MK I. My system: - http://mdcarter.smugmug.com/gallery/...27077317_Pufg7

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to TLS Guy For This Useful Post:

    Boerd (01-31-2013)

  4. #3
    Boerd is offline Full Audioholic Boerd is considered a mentor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    416
    Thanks Given
    211
    Thanks Received
    68

    Default

    Measuring headphones includes positioning them on a "dummy head" so I see why you're saying it's not reliable.
    So, your verdict is "head and shoulders over the dynamic types".
    Thank you!

  5. #4
    Boerd is offline Full Audioholic Boerd is considered a mentor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    416
    Thanks Given
    211
    Thanks Received
    68

  6. #5
    MinusTheBear's Avatar
    MinusTheBear is offline Audioholic Ninja MinusTheBear should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,506
    Thanks Given
    1,133
    Thanks Received
    863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boerd View Post
    What do you think of Audeze? Any idea?
    Pretty much the most tonally accurate headphones you can buy in the market today.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to MinusTheBear For This Useful Post:

    Boerd (01-31-2013)

  8. #6
    MinusTheBear's Avatar
    MinusTheBear is offline Audioholic Ninja MinusTheBear should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,506
    Thanks Given
    1,133
    Thanks Received
    863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boerd View Post
    Measuring headphones includes positioning them on a "dummy head" so I see why you're saying it's not reliable.
    So, your verdict is "head and shoulders over the dynamic types".
    Thank you!
    Headphones are much simpler and easier to quantify than loudspeaker measurements, however you need to listen to them as well. Note: flat frequency response from 20hz -20khz is considered tonally bright.

  9. #7
    Boerd is offline Full Audioholic Boerd is considered a mentor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    416
    Thanks Given
    211
    Thanks Received
    68

  10. #8
    Boerd is offline Full Audioholic Boerd is considered a mentor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    416
    Thanks Given
    211
    Thanks Received
    68

    Default

    I spent some time searching on the net for reviews/measurements.
    Audeze seem to have a problem with the highs. Quite a few people characterize these
    headphones as "dark". In the end STAX 009 look to be the better headphones.
    Now my problem with STAX (besides price) is they're not very practical.
    I already have the Benchmark on my desk at work. If I was to buy the STAX
    my desk starts looking like a hifi shop (I'd have to buy the STAX amp).

  11. #9
    Boerd is offline Full Audioholic Boerd is considered a mentor
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    416
    Thanks Given
    211
    Thanks Received
    68

  12. #10
    TLS Guy's Avatar
    TLS Guy is offline Audioholic Warlord TLS Guy should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Benedict MN
    Posts
    9,876
    Thanks Given
    865
    Thanks Received
    4,017

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boerd View Post
    Anybody has any idea how long can a Stax (like the 009 or 007) last?
    5 years? 10 years?
    Unfortunately I think you are out of luck with Stax. They went out of business, and the bones were bought by a Chinese outfit, and I can't find that they have produced any. Needle Doctor can no longer get them. So you would be looking for old stock or used. Stax had been in the electrostatic transducer business for sixty years, making electrostatic headphones going back into the fifties. I have never heard they were unreliable. However they were very expensive as they are complex and hard to manufacture just like electrostatic loudspeakers.

    So I think that now leaves the Sennheiser HD 800 as the top of the mountain.
    Marantz DV 9600 Oppo BD-83 Marantz AV 8003 Quad current dumping amps X 7 Direct TV HD 20 HD DVR Carter audio workstation RME Fireface 800 Fujitsu 50XHA40 Front left and right Carter dual transmission line studio monitors MK II. Center Carter coaxial transmission line center speaker Rear Carter NFM-1s Center backs Carter dual transmission line studio monitors MK I. My system: - http://mdcarter.smugmug.com/gallery/...27077317_Pufg7

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •