Both of the above are very good suggestions. You might also want to consider these:
Emotiva Professional, LLC
wurmng is a forum member in good standing
ski2xblack, i'm really liking the audioengine A5+ powered speakers. What other components that audioengine sells would you recommend? I like their subwoofer and amp as well. Would those all be a good fit together?
Also, I like the option to someday add on the wireless ability with the above equipment.
KEW should be listened to
Both of the above are very good suggestions. You might also want to consider these:
Emotiva Professional, LLC
wurmng (07-31-2012)
wurmng is a forum member in good standing
What do you guys think of the following setup;
- Audioengine 5+ powered speakers
- Audioengine 2 powered desktop speakers
- Audioengine S8 powered subwoofer
- Audioengine D124-Bit computer interface
Would I need to add any other components at this time?
Would everything integrate together properly?
Would 4 speakers be overkill?
Do I need an amp?
I could live without the powered desktop speakers if this hookup couldn't be done.
I want a "wired" system first and foremost while I'm learning and growing my knowledge.
Last edited by wurmng; 07-31-2012 at 01:52 PM.
KEW should be listened to
wurmng (08-01-2012)
wurmng is a forum member in good standing
anyone have any thoughts or opinions they could share in regards to my proposed file storage idea? I'd appreciate the insight!
cpd is gaining some recognition
Spend some time googling lossless vs lossy audio tests and doing some testing of your own. I think you will find that, all other things being equal, there is no discernible difference in audio quality between lossless and high bit rate lossy formats.
In my personal testing I was not able to hear any difference between FLAC and 320 kbs mp3 or AAC files. Do your own testing to find the right bit rate for you.
As other posters have mentioned, one advantage of lossless is that you can always convert to lossy but not the other way around (once the data is gone it cannot be recreated). Than being said, if you are retaining the CD's and hard drive space is an issue, a high bit rate lossy format may serve you just as well with no audible difference in sound quality.
Just my two cents.
wurmng (08-01-2012)
I like the idea of having the lossless files on external media. You can certainly have two different versions of the files on your two systems (laptop and iPhone).
After having a hard drive stop working on me...the one on which I had loaded all of the lossless files from 200+ CDs...I highly recommend having copies of those files on more than one set of media. You can burn far fewer DVDs, or use two hard drives, for example.
Mains and Surrounds: NHT 1.5s, Center: NHT AudioCenter-1, Subs: SVS PC13-Ultra, SB13-Ultra, Receiver: Pioneer Elite VSX-23, Amps: Emotiva RPA-1, POS-1, Display: Panasonic TC-P50G10
wurmng (08-01-2012)
saeyedoc is gaining some recognition
Rip to Flac, it's the most widely used lossless format. Then use XLD (free) to transcode to MP3 right into itunes so you can download into your idevices.
I use a Squeezebox to play my lossless audio on my big system.
wurmng (08-01-2012)
wurmng is a forum member in good standing
so itunes will allow me to rip to FLAC but won't allow me to play FLAC through itunes? Or am I completely missing a step in the progression of this whole file conversion... If someone could map this out and dumb it down that'd be really helpful
Like...
step 1 - open itunes
step 2 - insert cd into superdrive
step 3 - ...
step 28 - drink a beer!
iTunes doesn't support rip to Flac as far as I know. what saeyedoc is saying is to use EAC to rip to Flac and if needed convert to Alac
iTunes tutorial: Convert FLAC to ALAC using iTunes - YouTube
TV: TC-P55ST30 , AVR: TX-SR805. The Speaker Company 2x TST2, TC2, 2x TSB , Premier Acoustic PA-120 Sub, Netgear NeoTV 550, Harmony 880 URC RFS200, PC->Toslink-> Audioengine D1->JBL LSR2325P
When you're arguing with an idiot, make sure the person you are speaking to isn't doing the same thing.
wurmng (08-01-2012)