Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: No HDMI Output with Component Source

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow No HDMI Output with Component Source

    A reader asks Dr. A why he can't view some of his material on the TV he bought. Lots of people run into this problem, so we figured we'd take it to Dr. A for a solution.


    Discuss "No HDMI Output with Component Source" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    Drag0nFly is offline Enthusiast Drag0nFly is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default 1080p via component on the PS3

    I realize the article doesn't delve into specifics, but I just wanted to clear this up as it is mentioned on Wikipedia that the PS3 does indeed output 1080p over component--

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1080p

    If this is the case it is curious why other brands aren't able to offer it. I'd much rather run a quality component coaxial cable instead of messing around with twisted-pair HDMI with its HDCP nonsense, video dropouts/handshaking issues not mentioning problems with longer cable runs et al.

    Perhaps this is would make a good subject for a petition?
    (This DRM crap has sure dragged on for way too long...)

    And if it is limited in software on a disc-by-disc basis I see the rise of mods enabling this in a similar way as those counteracting region limitations...

  3. #3
    Simoncable is offline Enthusiast Simoncable is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Quality HDMI version 1.3 cable certainly performs much better than composite cable, when high definition is required.

  4. #4
    markw's Avatar
    markw is online now Audioholic Warlord markw should be listened to
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    New Joisey
    Posts
    7,504
    Thanks Given
    850
    Thanks Received
    1,916

    Default no argument there.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simoncable View Post
    Quality HDMI version 1.3 cable certainly performs much better than composite cable, when high definition is required.
    Composite cables don't pass high def signals.
    "Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit; wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad" - Anonymous

    Some of my systems: http://cgi.audioasylum.com/systems/1606.html

  5. #5
    Drag0nFly is offline Enthusiast Drag0nFly is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Well, my question was for component (YPbPr) cables; not composite. What a/v enthusiast uses composite anyway?

    The general idea was to get around the problems with HDMI without sacrificing quality.

  6. #6
    markw's Avatar
    markw is online now Audioholic Warlord markw should be listened to
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    New Joisey
    Posts
    7,504
    Thanks Given
    850
    Thanks Received
    1,916

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drag0nFly View Post
    Well, my question was for component (YPbPr) cables; not composite. What a/v enthusiast uses composite anyway?

    The general idea was to get around the problems with HDMI without sacrificing quality.
    Well, my response was to simoncable's comment, not yours.

    Didn't you read the post? Oh, you newbies...
    "Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit; wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad" - Anonymous

    Some of my systems: http://cgi.audioasylum.com/systems/1606.html

  7. #7
    Simoncable is offline Enthusiast Simoncable is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drag0nFly View Post
    Well, my question was for component (YPbPr) cables; not composite. What a/v enthusiast uses composite anyway?

    The general idea was to get around the problems with HDMI without sacrificing quality.
    Do you mean component AV cable doesn't work well, so you use HDMI cable?

  8. #8
    Simoncable is offline Enthusiast Simoncable is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by markw View Post
    Composite cables don't pass high def signals.
    You are right.
    The highest resolution that the composite cable supports is 480I.
    Component Cables supports resolutions of: 480i, 480p, 720p, 1080i and 1080p.

    However, many devices don't work well if you use component cable to get 1080P resolution.

  9. #9
    Simoncable is offline Enthusiast Simoncable is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Sorry, I read that article just now.
    Yeah, you can choose only those two options.
    This means the result you got is perhaps 480P.

  10. #10
    Drag0nFly is offline Enthusiast Drag0nFly is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markw View Post
    Well, my response was to simoncable's comment, not yours.

    Didn't you read the post? Oh, you newbies...
    Mr. Sensitive over here. Who said I was replying to your post? The whole thing got derailed due to the whole component vs. composite mixup.

    Perhaps you "non-newbie" could actually post something informative instead of nitpicking?

    What a pointless thread.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •