Mitsu to roll out new TVs up to 82"

[bandphan]

the press release....
Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America Announces Its Large Screen

2009 Home Theater TVs with 3D-Ready Technology


New Line-up Offers Incredible Picture Quality and Exceptional Value

and Includes World's Largest 3D-Ready TV at Giant 82" Screen Size

IRVINE, Calif. - April 8, 2009 - Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America, Inc. (MDEA) today announced its new Home Theater TV series for 2009, offering a larger than life, vivid viewing experience and includes 3D-Ready1 viewing technology – a feature becoming more in demand among consumers as 3D content production continues to increase. In addition to 3D-Ready, the new Home Theater TV product line features a solid offering of large screen sizes including an impressive 82" model. All eco-friendly MDEA Home Theater TVs are highly energy efficient, consuming approximately one-half the operating power of similarly sized flat panel TVs.

"Based on current economic conditions, consumers are looking for products that marry high quality with significant value, and TVs are no exception. Our new Home Theater TVs provide unparalleled picture performance and value, and are the best performing displays for large screen entertainment," said Frank DeMartin, vice president of marketing, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America. "We view Home Theater Television as a growth category, and our new 2009 line-up provides larger screen sizes, new technology enhancements, and notable efficiency in operating power consumption, which is becoming a prominent factor that consumers now consider when making a TV purchase."

Best in Large Screen Entertainment

MDEA continues to lead the competition with the largest Home Theater TVs available. The new 737 Series will include the all-new 82" 1080p model along with 60", 65" and 75" screen sizes - all featuring 3D-Ready viewing technology. The models will also include Smooth 120Hz™, New Advanced Video Calibration Mode, JADE Activity Based User Interface, Improved DeepField™ Imager, SharpEdge™, Video Noise Reduction, UltraThin™ Frame and Mitsubishi's Exclusive 6-Color Processor™ which provides significantly more color reproduction than typical flat panel TVs. All models are EnergyStar™ 3.0 qualified.

The MDEA 837 series boasts three premium Home Theater TV models ranging from 65"to 82", offering consumers outstanding picture performance with the ability to take advantage of the 3D-Ready capability. All of the Home Theater TVs are highly energy efficient and are EnergyStar 3.0 qualified offering another layer of value with each model consuming approximately one-half the operating power of similarly sized flat panel TVs, at around half the price. Other features include PerfectTint™, 4 HDMI 1.3a, Dark Detailer™, NetCommand®, USB Media Input, ISFccc Certified, and RS-232C Interface.

"As the home theater market continues to flourish and the cinema space continues to embrace 3D, we clearly see MDEA's 3D-Ready Home Theater TVs playing a key role in meeting consumers craving for the best and most advanced home theater experience," said David Naranjo, director of product development, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America. "MDEA's is clearly keeping pace with this increased demand and our new line-up of Home Theater TVs offer consumers the opportunity to bring 3D into their own home to enjoy 3D movies and games."

3D-Ready Redefines Home Theater Experience

MDEA's entire Home Theater product line re-defines the large screen entertainment category by offering 3D-Ready viewing technology. Mitsubishi is committed to making 3D a reality in consumer's homes worldwide and over the past several years, MDEA has worked closely with leading technology and content providers to develop the most compelling 3D experience for consumers, particularly for 3D gaming and movies.

Availability and Pricing

MDEA's Home Theater TV models are available now. Retail pricing is as follows:

737 Series

WD-60737 - $1,499.00 WD-73737 - $2,499.00

WD-65737 - $1,799.00 WD-82737 - $4,199.00

837 Series

WD-65837 - $2,199.00 WD-737837 - $2,999.00 WD-82837 - $4,999.00

[GlocksRock]

Just when I thought I wouldn't have to upgrade my tv since I had the biggest one, they go and make an 82"... And to top it all off, it's reasonably priced too... How much longer will there be a market for RP tv's?

[bandphan]

How much longer will there be a market for RP tv's?

I dont see the market bearing fruit to much longer for RPTVs

[Now Slappy]

Bandphan, you say they're available now. Do you know where?

[bandphan]

Bandphan, you say they're available now. Do you know where?

They will be shipping within the 3q this year(aug), some series faster than others...:)

[Now Slappy]

Damn, I was hoping you were going to say "you'll see 'em on Amazon within the week". LOL

I was going to buy one of the 73" diamonds but I may wait now for the 82". Decisions, decisions...

[AVRat]

Yeah, I read something recently that Samsung is out of the RP market.

[GlocksRock]

If Samsung is out, then that only leaves Mitsubishi, and who else? I think the DLP sets are the best value in HDTVs, but so many people want a thin flat tv they can mount on the wall. The only advantage I see to LCD, Plasma, LCoS, etc... is that they don't need lamp replacements every few thousand hours. But with the amount you save on the tv, it's not really that big of a deal, plus they don't make reasonably priced 65+" flat panel tvs yet. Let me know when I can get a 70" Plasma for around $2000 and I will go get one to replace my DLP.

[Now Slappy]

If Samsung is out, then that only leaves Mitsubishi, and who else? I think the DLP sets are the best value in HDTVs, but so many people want a thin flat tv they can mount on the wall. The only advantage I see to LCD, Plasma, LCoS, etc... is that they don't need lamp replacements ever few thousand hours. But with the amount you save on the tv, it's not really that big of a deal, plus they don't make reasonably priced 65+" flat panel tvs yet. Let me know when I can get a 70" Plasma for around $2000 and I will go get one to replace my DLP.


And see those are my thoughts exactly.

I'd love to get a projector but with the ambient light in my house it doesn't make it practical. I have a 73" Mitzu now and I don't want to go smaller just to be able to mount it on the wall. Not to mention, pay an extra two grand just for the privilege.

[bandphan]

Honeywell has an 80+ lcd due out this year, no specs or pricing.

[Now Slappy]

The more I think about the new 82" Mitzu, the more I fell like Veruca Salt...


....is that wrong?;):D

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dU7nG3KvZDA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dU7nG3KvZDA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[jostenmeat]

If Samsung is out, then that only leaves Mitsubishi, and who else? I think the DLP sets are the best value in HDTVs, but so many people want a thin flat tv they can mount on the wall. The only advantage I see to LCD, Plasma, LCoS, etc... is that they don't need lamp replacements every few thousand hours. But with the amount you save on the tv, it's not really that big of a deal, plus they don't make reasonably priced 65+" flat panel tvs yet. Let me know when I can get a 70" Plasma for around $2000 and I will go get one to replace my DLP.

And see those are my thoughts exactly.

I'd love to get a projector but with the ambient light in my house it doesn't make it practical. I have a 73" Mitzu now and I don't want to go smaller just to be able to mount it on the wall. Not to mention, pay an extra two grand just for the privilege.

The best value with DLP/RPTV comes with size for the dollar. But, let's be honest, it's not performance for the dollar. I can hardly care less about wall mounting, or thinness. I would get a plasma based on performance alone if I didn't use a FP.

Even the very bottom of the line Panasonic plasma outperforms any DLP RPTV that I've ever seen.

Just making a point. Would you really choose a 50" DLP over a 50" plasma? Of course not.

BTW, my parents have a DLP. My brother has both a DLP and plasma.

[ricks778]

I would like to know what happened to the LazerVue TV's Mitsubishi was going to come out with? Those sounded really good

[bandphan]

I would like to know what happened to the LazerVue TV's Mitsubishi was going to come out with? Those sounded really good

They did and had a very high failure rate.

[GlocksRock]

The best value with DLP/RPTV comes with size for the dollar. But, let's be honest, it's not performance for the dollar. I can hardly care less about wall mounting, or thinness. I would get a plasma based on performance alone if I didn't use a FP.

Even the very bottom of the line Panasonic plasma outperforms any DLP RPTV that I've ever seen.

Just making a point. Would you really choose a 50" DLP over a 50" plasma? Of course not.

BTW, my parents have a DLP. My brother has both a DLP and plasma.

Of course I would take the 50" Plasma over a 50" DLP any day, but a 50" plasma isn't priced beyond what I can afford. I can get a brand new 73" DLP for around $2000, even a 65" Plasma costs over $4000. I knew when I got my DLP that it didn't have the best picture quality, but I wanted a BIG tv. But for my bedroom tv, I have a 46" lcd that looks absolutely gorgeous, and I couldn't be happier with it, plus I got a really good price on in it since it was a refurb.

[itschris]

Until flat panels get larger and cheaper in those upper sizes, I think Mits will do well. I think most people buy their tv too small. I know several people now who've bought 40 to 50 inch LCD's and Plasmas who still don't feel they have that theater feeling. Yes, it's great for watching the news and what not, but you don't get the enveloped feeling you have with the larger screen sizes. For me, I thinik 60" is them minimum I'd ever want for a theater setup. I have my 65 which I sit about 10 or so from and I think it's fine... though 70+ would be even better. I almost bought the 73" model but though it's be too big and had difficulty find a cabinet that would work in the room. The screen size would be fine but the furniture is too big. Now... if they it was 73" flatscreen, I'd be all over it.

[bandphan]

Until flat panels get larger and cheaper in those upper sizes, I think Mits will do well. I think most people buy their tv too small. I know several people now who've bought 40 to 50 inch LCD's and Plasmas who still don't feel they have that theater feeling. Yes, it's great for watching the news and what not, but you don't get the enveloped feeling you have with the larger screen sizes. For me, I thinik 60" is them minimum I'd ever want for a theater setup. I have my 65 which I sit about 10 or so from and I think it's fine... though 70+ would be even better. I almost bought the 73" model but though it's be too big and had difficulty find a cabinet that would work in the room. The screen size would be fine but the furniture is too big. Now... if they it was 73" flatscreen, I'd be all over it.

They are flat screens up to 82" and a starting price that is affordable for the size. The question comes is motion blur and color spec going to be issues.

[ParadigmDawg]

I would say that my Mits DLP looks every bit as good as my Panny plasma or my LG LCD....The best value with DLP/RPTV comes with size for the dollar. But, let's be honest, it's not performance for the dollar. I can hardly care less about wall mounting, or thinness. I would get a plasma based on performance alone if I didn't use a FP.

Even the very bottom of the line Panasonic plasma outperforms any DLP RPTV that I've ever seen.

Just making a point. Would you really choose a 50" DLP over a 50" plasma? Of course not.

BTW, my parents have a DLP. My brother has both a DLP and plasma.

[Now Slappy]

The best value with DLP/RPTV comes with size for the dollar. But, let's be honest, it's not performance for the dollar. I can hardly care less about wall mounting, or thinness. I would get a plasma based on performance alone if I didn't use a FP.

Even the very bottom of the line Panasonic plasma outperforms any DLP RPTV that I've ever seen.

Just making a point. Would you really choose a 50" DLP over a 50" plasma? Of course not.

BTW, my parents have a DLP. My brother has both a DLP and plasma.

Point taken jostenmeat. I have a 42" Panny plasma in my bedroom that's great, but for my living room I want something bigger and if I save a couple of thousand while I'm at it...why not?

My 73" Mits is just over ten years old. I think it may have been their first 73" HD model. (I'd have to check the model # because I'm not sure.) My Panny plasma is light years ahead of it in PQ and it's so old it doesn't even have a single HDMI input.:eek:

What I'm trying to say, poorly and long winded I may add, is that any platform that I choose to go with will be a huge step up in PQ for me.

[AVRat]

Heh eh, my big @ass CRT is going on 14 yrs and it doesn't even have component connections. Oh the quandry when I upgrade!? :eek::(

[annunaki]

If Samsung is out, then that only leaves Mitsubishi, and who else? I think the DLP sets are the best value in HDTVs, but so many people want a thin flat tv they can mount on the wall. The only advantage I see to LCD, Plasma, LCoS, etc... is that they don't need lamp replacements every few thousand hours. But with the amount you save on the tv, it's not really that big of a deal, plus they don't make reasonably priced 65+" flat panel tvs yet. Let me know when I can get a 70" Plasma for around $2000 and I will go get one to replace my DLP.


What about off axis viewing? RPTV still suffers there in my opinion, almost as much as LCDs do.

[GlocksRock]

What about it? I'm not saying that these technologies are better than plasma, which is the best out there, but I have zero problem seeing my lcd from any angle, and the dlp doesn't look as good from extreme angles as it does from straight ahead, but in my living room there are only a couple seats that are off axis, and those still have less than a 45 degree angle. I know this isn't the case for everyone though. Maybe the asking prices for the really large plasma/lcd displays aren't outrageous, but I will take a loss in off axis viewing quality in order to save thousands of dollars... mainly because my seat will never be off axis, so I don't care.

[ivseenbetter]

Do the LCDs, Plasmas, and FPs provide any 3D capabilities like these new Mitz do? If not, than these provide a value in that arena too. Even if the others do have that capability, at what price?

[GlocksRock]

I'm not that concerned about a tv's 3d capabilities, when there is a lack of 3d source material. And I'm definitely not going to pay a premium for a technology like that which is still in it's infancy.

[jostenmeat]

Do the LCDs, Plasmas, and FPs provide any 3D capabilities like these new Mitz do? If not, than these provide a value in that arena too. Even if the others do have that capability, at what price?

Not yet, that I know of. I was asked by a friend earlier this week who works in marketing/advertising, if I would agree to be a blogger (her words?) for 3D tech, upcoming in a well respected brand that you all know. I'm pretty sure I'm not at liberty to say, whatever, let's just say they make good plasmas. I refused because I don't know enough about display tech, and I already spend too much time helping people at forums like this one.

But, until we know enough as consumers, I have to ask what exactly is 3D ready? Will that be like older displays, DLPs included, that are touted as 1080p . . . yet cannot accept a 1080p signal?! Or perhaps like the earlier HDMI capable receivers . . . that only handle PCM? But, the point is well taken iveseenbetter.

Regarding off-axis viewing with DLP, sure it fades a bit off axis, but it's the person who enjoys lying on the floor who must avoid this type of display at all costs.

I find where it is easiest to discern plasma's advantage is with black detail. If you look at them side by side it's very obvious, and that's even with plenty of ambient light in the room. For night viewing, you are talking about entirely different levels of performance. IMO.

[Now Slappy]

I've looked, but I don't seem to be able to find any spec sheets on the new 82" TV's.

Are they out there yet?

[bandphan]

I've looked, but I don't seem to be able to find any spec sheets on the new 82" TV's.

Are they out there yet?

I dont have Tech Specs yet. What are you looking for?

[Now Slappy]

Height, width, depth.

Really just the basics.

[AVRat]

Yes they're there under the 73" model as is the user guide/manual as well. http://www.mitsubishi-tv.com/pdf/WD73737_specsheet.pdf

[D-Jingle]

I sit 8ft away, and my 52" Samsung feels like it could be a little bigger.

at 60" I'd feel like I'm in a theatre.

At 82" who even has the space for one of these? You would probably be overwhlemed any closer than 12' away!

[Now Slappy]

I sit 8ft away, and my 52" Samsung feels like it could be a little bigger.

at 60" I'd feel like I'm in a theatre.

At 82" who even has the space for one of these? You would probably be overwhlemed any closer than 12' away!


Ha!! You're probably right, but right now I sit approx. 15'(maybe a little less) form my 73" Mits. It's great and all, but if I can squeeze it in I'll probably go with the 82".

[lsiberian]

I sit 8ft away, and my 52" Samsung feels like it could be a little bigger.

at 60" I'd feel like I'm in a theatre.

At 82" who even has the space for one of these? You would probably be overwhlemed any closer than 12' away!

I have a PJ and am not overwhelmed at 90" I think I sit about the same distance as you.

There are numerous screen size calculators, but I think you would be fine.

[just-some-guy]

12' away from my 65". its almost too small. 82" would be great.

[GlocksRock]

I sit 12 ft. away from my 73" and it's just right. 12 ft. = 144 inches/2=74", so my screen size is just right for my viewing distance.

[itschris]

They are flat screens up to 82" and a starting price that is affordable for the size. The question comes is motion blur and color spec going to be issues.

Are you saying 72"+ flatscreens (LCD/Plasmas) are available at a real world price? I think maybe my inability to type while multi-tasking and my failure to proof on my post may have thrown you.

My neighbor's boss has a pj setup in his media room... a 90" screen. Sitting about 15 feet away was just fine.

[jostenmeat]

I sit 15' away from a 159" 16:9 screen. This is 376% the display size of the 82" display. It also represents a 42 degree viewing angle. The THX rec is 36 degrees, but that rec is for 16:9 AR. Most of my movies are in "wider" aspects.

Everyone I've ever asked says they would not change a thing. This includes a director of 10 years, just inducted into the DGA last year.

Last night I watched Quantum of Solace with a good friend. He says he is going to bring over a friend who is a movie producer, because he is sure that this friend will be blown away.

I might be the only person here that fired up the pic at the blank wall for an entire week to find the ideal display size. I predicted* 120", but after 7+ days, I knew bigger would be better. The only downside, and it's a big one, is the poorer center speaker placement, since I don't use an AT screen.

I would submit that 99.9% of folks have no idea how incredible the pic is from a mid-level projector. Mine is already twice superceded, had for $3k, and is the most beautiful pic anyone I know has ever seen. It wasn't even the high-end unit, and I can't imagine how good it really can get.

Sorry about the hijack. Just wanted to give anyone a nudge, if sitting on the fence.

[Now Slappy]

I sit 15' away from a 159" 16:9 screen. This is 376% the display size of the 82" display. It also represents a 42 degree viewing angle. The THX rec is 36 degrees, but that rec is for 16:9 AR. Most of my movies are in "wider" aspects.

Everyone I've ever asked says they would not change a thing. This includes a director of 10 years, just inducted into the DGA last year.

Last night I watched Quantum of Solace with a good friend. He says he is going to bring over a friend who is a movie producer, because he is sure that this friend will be blown away.

I might be the only person here that fired up the pic at the blank wall for an entire week to find the ideal display size. I predicted* 120", but after 7+ days, I knew bigger would be better. The only downside, and it's a big one, is the poorer center speaker placement, since I don't use an AT screen.

I would submit that 99.9% of folks have no idea how incredible the pic is from a mid-level projector. Mine is already twice superceded, had for $3k, and is the most beautiful pic anyone I know has ever seen. It wasn't even the high-end unit, and I can't imagine how good it really can get.

Sorry about the hijack. Just wanted to give anyone a nudge, if sitting on the fence.

I would love to go with a projector, but ambient light during the day just doesn't make it feasible. :(

[jostenmeat]

I would love to go with a projector, but ambient light during the day just doesn't make it feasible. :(

Yeah. FWIW, If you have $3.6k, you can get a 42" Panasonic plasma, Epson PJ, and a 120" Dalite High Power manual draw screen. That is the screen I use, and even ordering it custom black with CSR was it still less than $1k shipped. We're talking about a 75 sq ft display.

[Now Slappy]

Yeah. FWIW, If you have $3.6k, you can get a 42" Panasonic plasma, Epson PJ, and a 120" Dalite High Power manual draw screen. That is the screen I use, and even ordering it custom black with CSR was it still less than $1k shipped. We're talking about a 75 sq ft display.

Man, you're making me rethink this all over again. LOL:D

[clouso]

iv seen no one talking about their new laservue??

[bandphan]

iv seen no one talking about their new laservue??

Re-Read the this thread, there is mention. ;)

[allargon]

The LaserVue's are like $7k for a 65". That is a different thing altogether.

The 82" has many excited as that is near front projection screen in size without the ambient light drawbacks that most front projectors have.

[Now Slappy]

I just stopped by my local Mitzu dealer and she let me know when they will actually be getting in the new TV's.

WD-73837...ships in mid May

WD-82737...ships end of May

WD-82837...ships mid June

[bandphan]

I just stopped by my local Mitzu dealer and she let me know when they will actually be getting in the new TV's.

WD-73837...ships in mid May

WD-82737...ships end of May

WD-82837...ships mid June

i still expect the diamonds to be ready for delivery in Aug...

[Now Slappy]

Yeah, you're probably right Bandphan.

[joikd]

i still expect the diamonds to be ready for delivery in Aug...

When you say "diamond" do you mean the 837's? I just want to make sure that nothing better is coming that I should wait for.

[Now Slappy]

When you say "diamond" do you mean the 837's? I just want to make sure that nothing better is coming that I should wait for.

Yup, that's exactly what he means.

[joikd]

Yup, that's exactly what he means.

4electronicwarehouse.com calls the 82837 a Medallion. (not enough posts to link)

Maybe Laservue has taken over the Diamond name?

[bandphan]

4electronicwarehouse.com calls the 82837 a Medallion. (not enough posts to link)

Maybe Laservue has taken over the Diamond name?

"8" series have been the diamond line, which extends thru all off their displays.

[bandphan]

4electronicwarehouse.com calls the 82837 a Medallion. (not enough posts to link)

Maybe Laservue has taken over the Diamond name?
On another note are they even allowed the diamond line?

[axle_rose]

I am real happy with my DLP tv and I love the way the picture looks compared to the flat panel LCD or plasma sets. IMHO, the dlp picture looks more film like to me. I am kind of laughing at 82" tho...seems a little much for an average living room. The cost to get into a dlp is another advantage also.

[cheapskate40]

Has anyone read any reviews on this new line of sets? I read a review on the 735 series that said the color adjustments were limited. I was hoping Mitsubishi has fixed this with the 737/837 series. I think these TV's represent good value for the price/size.

[bandphan]

The diamond line will have more adjustments thru the net command menu. Both will offer service menu adjustments for isf calibrations. As for reviews comming soon ;)

[just-some-guy]

sure wish i had an 82" .

[Now Slappy]

sure wish i had an 82" .

My wife had initially said no to the 82", but after I put together our new Salamander stand and she started taking measurements in our living room...82" here I come!!

Now if they would only get here...:o

[GlocksRock]

as nice as an 82" tv would be, I think I'm gonna stick with the 73". I'm already 12 feet away from the tv, and I think 82" might be a tad large for my viewing distance. But I am excited to see one of these in the stores, as I'm curious as to see how good the picture is on a set that large.

[jostenmeat]

I'm already 12 feet away from the tv, and I think 82" might be a tad large for my viewing distance.

Believe it or not, even with 20/20 vision, you cannot appreciate the full benefit of 1080p with a 82" from 12 ft. You need a bigger set, or scoot your seat up, or have better than 20/20 vision in order to do so.

Personal preference is its own thing, but that's FWIW.

[just-some-guy]

My wife had initially said no to the 82", but after I put together our new Salamander stand and she started taking measurements in our living room...82" here I come!!

Now if they would only get here...:o


:thumbsup: whats it costin ya ?

i wanted a 73". but for $1000 (what i could find at the time) more = well.
but this may be a blessing. as i am priming myself for a projector. somewhere around 100" @ about 11' distance.

fwiw. last night i saw the new STAR TREK in IMAX. pq was kinda crappy, sq was pretty good, except for the occasional speaker distress, sub output was descent, but can't nearly match what i have. anyway, the screen was darned big, i will sit further back next time. this time i was there to critique the sq. so i found the sweat spot.

[Now Slappy]

:thumbsup: whats it costin ya ?

i wanted a 73". but for $1000 (what i could find at the time) more = well.
but this may be a blessing. as i am priming myself for a projector. somewhere around 100" @ about 11' distance.

fwiw. last night i saw the new STAR TREK in IMAX. pq was kinda crappy, sq was pretty good, except for the occasional speaker distress, sub output was descent, but can't nearly match what i have. anyway, the screen was darned big, i will sit further back next time. this time i was there to critique the sq. so i found the sweat spot.

Well as jostenmeat can attest, I'm now back on the fence between the 82"er and a FP once again.:rolleyes: (God, I'm horrible at making up my mind.:o)

The 82"er will run me $4k for the diamond version, which is about 1000 off their list. Yesterday I was in the projector section of the board and started doing the numbers in my head again. For what I'm about to pay for the 82"er I could probably get a nice FP setup, but it's not a dedicated HT(my living room) and there is a lot of daytime TV viewing(SpongeBob, Dora...you get the picture) so maybe the TV is the right way to go.

I'm at a loss...:o

[just-some-guy]

what is the veiwing distance ? get a retractable screen, and a smaller set behind it.
and you already have a 73", is the 82" going to make that much difference ? hmmm

[Now Slappy]

The viewing distance is anywhere from 12'-15'. Right now it's 13' because the current set is very deep. (Almost 3' deep) There is plenty of play as to where I can place the couch so I can set my viewing distance to whatever I want within reason. Max probably 17'.

To address your second point, that's another option I've been kicking around but it seems as the sentiment around here is if you have a retractable screen you really need to have it tab tensioned($$$) and if I were to go this route I wouldn't have enough in my budget to get a plasma, FP, and a tab tensioned screen. I'm tring to keep the budget around $4k, +/- $500 or so.

And to your last point, yeah I know it won't be a huge difference, but if I don't go with a FP I would still like to get as close as I can to a theater experience as I can. My wife and I haven't been to a movie theater since seeing Dr. Dolittle in 1998...our first date.

Thanks for the help,
Keith

[just-some-guy]

this may sound crazy, maybe it is. but how about a tilt up screen ? DIY screen,top hinged, lift the bottom to the ceiling when not in use ?

ok, i will shut up now :D

[Now Slappy]

No worries, that is a great idea but we have vaulted ceilings so it wouldn't be practical. Not to mention my wife would probably shoot me. LOL:D

[cheapskate40]

I had the 65737 delivered on Monday. I am impressed with the picture and color on this set. I am by no means a videophile, and I was replacing a 46" Hitachi CRT rear projection. There is a review on CNET now that is fairly accurate- the remote is terrible and the menus are cumbersome. For the size and price so far I am pleased.

[AVRat]

I happened to checkout a local A/V shop yesterday as I was looking for options larger than the Panny 65” V10. They sell Mitsubishis and I gotta say the new sets look awesome. HT Mag just did a review of the 73837 with good marks. Speaking with a salesguy, he mentioned that Mits was continuing with the Laservue and will have ~75” unit suitable for wall mounting come next spring, and in the $4500 range. I’m intrigued? Anything from CEDIA about this?