View Full Version : What Size Screen or Television Do I Need?
admin
02-21-2008, 09:42 AM
We get asked this question alot and we have, in fact, addressed it during the course of various projector and flat panel reviews. It is an important topic, however, and we feel that it is truly worthy of some personal attention - especially given these times of rapidly dropping flat panel display prices. While many believe that "bigger is always better," getting the right screen size means that you can truly optimize your home theater budget and allocate your money in teh best way possible to make sure you get the best visuals and sound possible. We'll take you through several ways to effectively determine the best screen size for your room, and give you some general guidelines for figuring out your own needs.
http://www.audioholics.com/buying-guides/how-to-shop/what-size-screen-display/image_thumb
Discuss "What Size Screen or Television Do I Need?" here. Read the article (http://www.audioholics.com/buying-guides/how-to-shop/what-size-screen-display).
Wayde Robson
02-21-2008, 01:26 PM
"so it's probably best to err on the side of going a bit larger."
I like that rule.
Great measurement excercise, I'll have to try it at the local cineplex.
I know I am probably not alone in my preference to have most of my peripheral vision taken up when I'm watching a movie. My pref is to sit comfortably, stare at the middle of the screen and not see much but the screen.
I want to feel vertigo in the dragon flight scenes in Eragon. Yeah, I'm the type that sits near the front of the theater, although if it's going to be crowded I usually try and take a seat near an edge, because I have to pee at least once - it's a bit of an annoyance.
I should stop drinking beer before going to the movies.:o
Jim Robbins
02-21-2008, 03:07 PM
Wow, that's an excellent article! I haven't thought about it in this way before. That's a pretty simple formula for figuring out what you think "big" is. Yeah, erring on the side of big is good, but if you get motion sick, like Wayde there, you might want to go to the slightly smaller size. Of course, there is always the WAF to consider. (Wife Acceptance Factor) *grin* To be fair, I have met a couple of women who wanted a bigger screen than their husbands. It's a rare occurrence.... Even though my wife isn't one of those, she still allows me to have a 106" screen. Yeah, that's big. Hmmm... I wonder if I could go bigger. ;)
BobMac
02-21-2008, 03:37 PM
Bigger is better.
GlocksRock
02-21-2008, 11:56 PM
I agree with the article, when I was 8 feet away from my old 50" tv it was just right. So when I moved into my new house, and was sitting 12 feet away, it seemed too small so I got a 73" tv, and it's just right. It's definitely a big tv, but it was a better option for me than going with a front projection setup. But it all comes down to personal preference, and budget. But for the money you can't really beat a DLP when it comes to screen size for your money.
ivseenbetter
02-22-2008, 09:42 AM
But it all comes down to personal preference, and budget. But for the money you can't really beat a DLP when it comes to screen size for your money.
You can beat it with an LCD front projection system :D
supervij
02-22-2008, 11:31 AM
That is a such a simple formula, I never woulda thought of doing it that way! Nice! It also confirms a handy rule of thumb I discovered: take your eyeball-to-screen distance and divide by two. That will give you a ballpark figure of what size (diagonal) screen to look for. Worked great for me: I'm 100 inches away from my 50-inch TV. For SD, it's a tad soft, but for HD, it's just a wee too small -- a good balance, since I watch both.
cheers,
supervij
jaydog67
05-22-2008, 12:51 AM
I have a living room at my apartment that is 14 feet deep by 18 wide. I had a smaller room at our last place. We have a 60" phillips HD projection tv and it fits alot better in our new apartment. The last house's room we had the tv in was about 12 feet deep. So there is the possibility of having too much of a tv.
Phil Taylor
09-24-2008, 12:47 AM
I sit 9ft away from my 7ft wide front projector screen. Does that make me abnormal? :o
PhillipCann
10-01-2008, 03:27 AM
i like the rule! bigger the better
Jacko123
10-13-2008, 10:30 AM
IT's not about what size TV you need, it's about what size TV you want!
jberc
11-19-2008, 04:22 PM
I'm 100 inches away from my 50-inch TV. For SD, it's a tad soft, but for HD, it's just a wee too small -- a good balance, since I watch both.
cheers,
supervij
Funny, I have the same experience. I actually move my sofa closer or further from my 50 inch depending on what I'm watching. Open floorplan, hardwood floors and felt sliders make it easy.
mikeboy
11-29-2008, 04:24 AM
I heard that it was silly to buy 1080p, because cable companies do not support this. Is this true?
Also, is it necessary to buy some sort of connecting wire for HD, as opposed to the normal connection coming with the cable outlet? If one has basic cable, does one have to rent a box to get the HD on the major networks, e.g. if one is plugged into the wall outlet to avoid an A/B switch?
Thanks.
1tribeca
11-30-2008, 12:28 PM
I wouldn't say it was "silly" to have 1080p capable equip.
The cable companies broadcast HD in 1080i not 1080p (google the difference, takes too long to scribble down here...besides, it's been explained to death!)
Bluray is the only source material where you'll get 1080p. Is it worth it? Depends on the individual. If you're sitting 12 feet from a 42" TV then you won't see the benefit of the additional pixel count. If you're less than 8 feet you'll enjoy the step up in PQ.
The whole "1080p" thing is a great sales tool for retailers & manufacturers alike. It's a good bit of technology, but far from being the stand alone decision maker. You have to consider a whack of other criteria when making your choice...contrast/black levels, lifelike colour reproduction etc. I've seen many 720p panels kick the crap out of a lesser quality 1080p panel based on the other viewing factors!
You need a digital cable box to get the upper channels on the cable bandwidth. NOTE: a basic digital box DOES NOT give you HD channels!!
To get HD from the cable company you'll need an HD box (go figure!!!) same applies for satellite.
Once you have the aforementioned HD box, you can get the HD content to your TV one of 2 ways.
1) Connection through component cables (red, blue, green) A seperate audio connection is needed with this configuration...either analog L/R or a digital connection
2) HDMI cable. This will do the whole thing (however, some prefer to route the audio to a different input) I know here in Toronto, the Rogers cable boxes can have some issues with HDMI cables (get with the program Rogers!!)
You CANNOT get HD from your HD box with composite (single yellow RCA connector) connection, or S-Video either!!
onlinegadgeteer
12-29-2008, 02:43 AM
If you are watching television from to near. You can use 21'' inch television and from my suggestion Sony is best for all the things.
latiger12
01-10-2009, 03:08 AM
I heard that it was silly to buy 1080p, because cable companies do not support this. Is this true?
Also, is it necessary to buy some sort of connecting wire for HD, as opposed to the normal connection coming with the cable outlet? If one has basic cable, does one have to rent a box to get the HD on the major networks, e.g. if one is plugged into the wall outlet to avoid an A/B switch?
Thanks.
Not silly, you want to buy the 1080p TV to get the best possible picture quality. My cable company supports 1080p and so does my BlueRay DVD player.
The normal cable wire out of the wall will connect to an HD receiver provided by the cable company if you get the HD package. You should then by and HDMI cable to connect the box to the TV. Buy the wire online, they are WAY over priced in retail stores.
mediaholic
01-11-2009, 02:17 PM
Very informative for a newbie, such as myself. Thanks for the article.
Clint DeBoer
01-13-2009, 09:11 AM
You're welcome!
drdawg
01-13-2009, 02:46 PM
I joke with my wife about bigger is better and how we have a 13 foot room from wall to where we sit on the couch a bit more to the tv screen as we have ours above our fireplace mantel(one that i wish i could rip out!, but she wont let me). But we were at the store last weekend and she was like why don't we get a 65 inch one. Perfect for me as i like the size and the distance and it may keep my eyes off the damn mantel!
chili1234
02-03-2009, 12:44 PM
bigger is always better
D-Jingle
02-25-2009, 02:39 AM
I love the rule of 2 -- 50" screen ideal from 100" away.
I hope this image helps explain further
http://www.homeappliancegallery.com/images/articles/720p-1080p-viewing-distance-tv-size-chart.jpg
supervij
02-26-2009, 12:08 AM
That rule of 2 works well if you're watching both high and standard definition. I used the rule of 2 when I purchased my set, and it's exactly that -- a 50" set at 100" distance. The SD material is just a wee soft and the HD material is just a wee small -- a good balance. If you're watching exclusively HD, you may want to opt for bigger.
cheers,
supervij
stewtopia
03-03-2009, 02:09 PM
Nice D-Jingle
I was about to post the same thing!
resolution
03-12-2009, 04:12 PM
There is such a thing as too large of a screen size, even if you don't consider cost. One can see display artifacts like pixels. So for a 50" TV where does one start to see pixels? That depends on your visual acuity. At my age (60) I can see about 25 cy/deg of human vision. My 21 year old daughter can see nearly 50 cy/deg. If you follow the rule of buying a TV with a diagonal that is 1/2 your viewing distance a 50" TV viewed from 100" would exhibit 38.4 cy/degee for 1920 x 1080 format, which means that I cannot possibly see pixels, but my daughter may be able to. I would have to get to 65 inches to see pixels.
So if we ever see QHDTV introduced you will be able to buy 2X the screen than you could buy today an still see no pixels.
drdawg
07-20-2009, 12:30 AM
There is no such thing as too big!!! Actually I like this article alot and i did start with it as the basis but then we were at the store with the impression we should have gotten a 52-55 incher from the article but then we were there and saw a tv we loved. We asked how bit it was and were told it was 65 inches and then we had them measure from the tv to where we were standing and it was a foot less then we had in our place. We ended up buying it and if we bought the 55 incherr it would have been too small.
So my suggestion is use this article as a guide and then measure out the space in your room from the wall to the sitting area that you will most be using. Take into account also diagnols (you made need to measure distance from wall to couch area and then the height of where you are going to put the tv and then do the pythagoream theorem to find the diagnol length!)
if this blew your mind i am sorry to be a geek!
Come on we all remember this from geometry!!!!
Ketan
HDPCsound
10-09-2009, 06:21 PM
It depends, i always love to have a decent size Tv on my bedroom, but a bigger one on the living room. Is the one used for gaming, movies, etc.
Big AV
10-15-2009, 02:09 PM
I have a 55" screen and I am about 12 feet away and that works a treeat
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.