starflight
12-03-2007, 05:54 PM
Hi guys,
I'm thinking of surround speakers to finish up my HT setup. As my signature states, I have the RTi12's and the CSi5 center is coming when it is available. Back-ordered right now. Now I've already spent more than what I wanted to on the front 3 and the receiver so I'm in no rush which is good cause I can do some research.
Anyway, I was considering the RTi4 or 6s for surrounds. They sounded pretty good for stereo when I auditioned them. My question is about FX3 of FX5's. These are apparently dipole/bipole speakers. What is the advantage to have these are surrounds? I'm sure since they were specifically design to be surrounds, I anticipate a better sound field? Does that make any sense. Anyway, I just wanted to get your opinions on these. Are they worth the extra $$$ over the RTi 4 or 6's?
If so, what is a good price to pay for them? I find the Polk MRSP way out of wack, especially on all the sales going around online. Cheers!
I'm thinking of surround speakers to finish up my HT setup. As my signature states, I have the RTi12's and the CSi5 center is coming when it is available. Back-ordered right now. Now I've already spent more than what I wanted to on the front 3 and the receiver so I'm in no rush which is good cause I can do some research.
Anyway, I was considering the RTi4 or 6s for surrounds. They sounded pretty good for stereo when I auditioned them. My question is about FX3 of FX5's. These are apparently dipole/bipole speakers. What is the advantage to have these are surrounds? I'm sure since they were specifically design to be surrounds, I anticipate a better sound field? Does that make any sense. Anyway, I just wanted to get your opinions on these. Are they worth the extra $$$ over the RTi 4 or 6's?
If so, what is a good price to pay for them? I find the Polk MRSP way out of wack, especially on all the sales going around online. Cheers!