View Full Version : arcam avr 300 V.S. nad,yamaha,denon,rotel etc(the truth of the industry)
jeff/audioman
07-14-2004, 10:39 PM
deleted - blatent self promotion.
Clint DeBoer
07-15-2004, 12:49 AM
Could you retype that in English? Or was it a sales pitch? I couldn't follow you since I didn't have my decoder ring handy... :)
barend
07-27-2004, 06:25 AM
Probably his ENTER key is busted
Barend
cornelius
07-27-2004, 01:01 PM
It's kind of like a poem. Anyway, the Arcam/Vandersteen combo is a really good one. A nice step up from the usual stuff that we see here.
BuddTX
07-27-2004, 02:22 PM
Hey, the post coulda been worse!
IT COULD HAVE BEEN IN ALL CAPS AND NO PUNCTIONATION
aaaRick
08-17-2004, 01:45 PM
I found this page on a search for Arcam. I saw a couple of their integrated's at a high end store here in So. Ca. and they're gorgeous. I'm gonna let go of a Lexicon DC-1 Pre/Pro and already sold some separate amps.
Arcam as a receiver? Yeah, I think I'll search this puppy out and test it's mettle.
On a separate note; In the last 5 years most of my 'audio' money has gone into home computing (sound cards, desk speakers etc.) and one day a high end audio company is gonna wake up and realize there's money to be made in computer audio. Wish I was a genius.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.