Well I've narrowed it down to the following receivers: marantz 5500, H/K 435, and the pioneer 1015. I'm moving my old receiver (Denon avr 3200, one of the first units) to another part of the house and want to go 7.1 in my main area. I'd would appreciate anyone that has these receivers to comment on my findings so far. My main use for the receiver is for movies, some music, but mostly movies. My speakers are PSB IMAGE 4t with a Stratus subsonic 3i. So here is my thoughts:
Pioneer:
pros: 3 component inputs, Auto EQ, THXcessing(not that big of deal), cost ~420 shipped...
cons: limited digital inputs, no audio sync
Marantz:
Pros: audio sync, digital inputs, cost (refurb ~420)
Cons: 2 component inputs, it doesn't appear to allow you to apply DDIIx to 5.1 sources (this is my bigggest complaint since I want 7.1, I emailed marantz and they said it should, but I was unable to get it to do that during a listening session..bummer, if anyone has any info on this I would appreciate it)
H/K:
Pros: component inputs, digital inputs, Logic 7 processing, audio sync, autoEQ
Cons: cost:~580shipped
If cost wasn't an issue then the H/K appears to have it all, with the pioneer second, and marantz third. Now most will say go and listen to them, but that is almost impossible when H/K is carried at Circuit city and pioneer at Best buy, not good listening stores.
So my final question is the H/K worth the extra $160...any thoughts would be appreciated.
