Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: Classe CT-2300 Stereo Power Amplifier Review

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Classe CT-2300 Stereo Power Amplifier Review

    The Classe CT-2300 300wpc/600wpc (8/4 ohms, respectively) two-channel power amplifier is well engineered from inside and out. Classe's unique ICTunnel keeps the amplifier running cool under all operating conditions making it an ideal option for rack mounting. Feed this baby the very best speakers you can afford and it will rewarded you with a sonic landscape not achievable by lesser designed amplifiers. From its benchmark test results to its pristine sonic virtues, I found my time with this amplifier to be a pure delight. After two months of dining on the CT-2300, I can say with total confidence that my appetite is fully satisfied. Highly recommended!


    Discuss "Classe CT-2300 Stereo Power Amplifier Review" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    Adam's Avatar
    Adam is offline Audioholic Jedi Adam should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    26,523
    Thanks Given
    7,583
    Thanks Received
    9,127

    Default

    Hi, Gene - nice review! Those amps are way out of my league, but I like reading about them.

    In the design overview, you show two top views that compare the CT-2300 to the CA-2300. Is the image of the CT-2300 an older version? The internal components are different from the CA-2300 (but you say they should be identical), and the number of speaker terminals doesn't match (looks like two columns of them instead of four).

    Mains and Surrounds: NHT 1.5s, Center: NHT AudioCenter-1, Subs: SVS PC13-Ultra, SB13-Ultra, Receiver: Pioneer Elite VSX-23, Amps: Emotiva RPA-1, POS-1, Display: Panasonic TC-P50G10

  3. #3
    GranteedEV's Avatar
    GranteedEV is offline Audioholic Ninja GranteedEV should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    4,485
    Thanks Given
    1,967
    Thanks Received
    2,034

    Default

    Great Review Gene. This seems like a very nice amp for a pair of Salk SS12s
    System: Marantz SR6003
    ---> Crown XLS 2000 ---> Philharmonic Model 2
    ---> Tapco Juice J2500 --> DIY Maelstrom X


    Victory goes... TO THOSE WITH COURAGE!!!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:

    monkish54 (12-21-2012)

  5. #4
    gene's Avatar
    gene is online now Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,818
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam View Post
    Hi, Gene - nice review! Those amps are way out of my league, but I like reading about them.

    In the design overview, you show two top views that compare the CT-2300 to the CA-2300. Is the image of the CT-2300 an older version? The internal components are different from the CA-2300 (but you say they should be identical), and the number of speaker terminals doesn't match (looks like two columns of them instead of four).

    thanks for your compliments.

    Yes the internals are identical. just the layout is a bit different. Both amps have two pairs of binding posts for bi-wiring under the but the power transformer is oriented differently according to the pic. Classe told me they are identical so it is possible the components are different due to old/new pic as you mentioned.
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  6. #5
    AcuDefTechGuy's Avatar
    AcuDefTechGuy is online now Audioholic Overlord AcuDefTechGuy should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Krypton
    Posts
    13,590
    Thanks Given
    3,377
    Thanks Received
    3,032

    Default

    Classe amps are nice and pretty and have great output numbers.

    It's funny how some guys actually complained that Classe amps just don't make their speakers sound as good. Some guys are nuts.
    REVEL SALON2 . B&W 802D2 . KEF 201/2 (6) . LINKWITZ ORION3 . TAD 2201 . DYNAUDIO X32 . FOCAL 826V . ATC SCM7 . PHILHARMONIC 3 . FUNK 18.0 (2) . RBH SX-1010N (2) . VELODYNE SC600 (4) . PIONEER MM301 (8) . DENON AVP-A1HD/AVR-5308/AVR-3312/DVD-3800BD . ATI 3005/3002/2004/6012 . BENQ W6000 . ADCOM GFS-600 . APPLE TV . KIMBER KABLE 8PR

    My System Photo . My System Video

  7. #6
    AcuDefTechGuy's Avatar
    AcuDefTechGuy is online now Audioholic Overlord AcuDefTechGuy should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Krypton
    Posts
    13,590
    Thanks Given
    3,377
    Thanks Received
    3,032

    Default

    Have you asked ATI to send AH an AT3007 amp yet?

    Anyone has a Mark Levinson amp so we can compare?
    REVEL SALON2 . B&W 802D2 . KEF 201/2 (6) . LINKWITZ ORION3 . TAD 2201 . DYNAUDIO X32 . FOCAL 826V . ATC SCM7 . PHILHARMONIC 3 . FUNK 18.0 (2) . RBH SX-1010N (2) . VELODYNE SC600 (4) . PIONEER MM301 (8) . DENON AVP-A1HD/AVR-5308/AVR-3312/DVD-3800BD . ATI 3005/3002/2004/6012 . BENQ W6000 . ADCOM GFS-600 . APPLE TV . KIMBER KABLE 8PR

    My System Photo . My System Video

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to AcuDefTechGuy For This Useful Post:

    monkish54 (12-21-2012)

  9. #7
    AcuDefTechGuy's Avatar
    AcuDefTechGuy is online now Audioholic Overlord AcuDefTechGuy should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Krypton
    Posts
    13,590
    Thanks Given
    3,377
    Thanks Received
    3,032

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
    Great Review Gene. This seems like a very nice amp for a pair of Salk SS12s
    What's the odds of Salk sending Gene a SS12 for review?
    REVEL SALON2 . B&W 802D2 . KEF 201/2 (6) . LINKWITZ ORION3 . TAD 2201 . DYNAUDIO X32 . FOCAL 826V . ATC SCM7 . PHILHARMONIC 3 . FUNK 18.0 (2) . RBH SX-1010N (2) . VELODYNE SC600 (4) . PIONEER MM301 (8) . DENON AVP-A1HD/AVR-5308/AVR-3312/DVD-3800BD . ATI 3005/3002/2004/6012 . BENQ W6000 . ADCOM GFS-600 . APPLE TV . KIMBER KABLE 8PR

    My System Photo . My System Video

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to AcuDefTechGuy For This Useful Post:

    monkish54 (12-21-2012)

  11. #8
    Batman1969 is offline Audiophyte Batman1969 is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    4

    Default

    Perfect example of why the high end is dying. A $6K+ amp made in China. Looks cool, sounds good, but is the purpose of making the amp in China to make the amp more affordable and more available to the masses or to maximize profits? I'd say based on the price, maximize profits. I used to own a Classe 5 preamp. Good preamp. The 6 was awesome. I don't think either of these products were made in China. Having owned Classe and other high end products, I will stick with my home theater receiver made in China at 1/8th the price of the Classe, but at least 50% of the performance. Not dissing the performance of the product, but as a consumer, the retail pricing makes me want to puke given where the amp is made.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Batman1969 For This Useful Post:

    AcuDefTechGuy (09-19-2012),ahblaza (09-19-2012),cpp (09-19-2012),monkish54 (12-21-2012)

  13. #9
    panteragstk's Avatar
    panteragstk is offline Full Audioholic panteragstk is quite helpful
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    392
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanks Received
    103

    Default

    I usually don't try to steer a discussion, but why does where it's made automatically make it less desirable? If it is just as high in quality if it was made in the US/Canada then what does it matter?

  14. #10
    3db's Avatar
    3db
    3db is offline Audioholic Spartan 3db should be listened to
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    7,330
    Thanks Given
    1,330
    Thanks Received
    1,385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by panteragstk View Post
    I usually don't try to steer a discussion, but why does where it's made automatically make it less desirable? If it is just as high in quality if it was made in the US/Canada then what does it matter?
    I think what the previous poster is saying is that because its made in China where labor is dirt cheap, a price drop should be expected but its not the case. I happen to concur with him. Even though Classe is a Canadian company, I would expect the price to be cheaper now that its being built in China. $3000 per channel sounds very expensive.
    Receiver Yamaha RX-V1800
    Turntable ProJect Xpression III with Ortofon Red
    Display Vizio SV-470M 47"
    BluRay/CD Sony BDP-S360
    Media Player Iomega Screenplay MX2
    Speakers PSB Image T-45 Front,
    PSB Image 8C Center
    PSB Image 1B Surrounds
    Subwoofer PSB Subsonic 5

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 3db For This Useful Post:

    ahblaza (09-19-2012),monkish54 (12-21-2012)

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •