Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 61

Thread: Emotiva UPA-500 Five Channel Power Amplifier Review

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Emotiva UPA-500 Five Channel Power Amplifier Review

    Riddle me this. What's affordable, lightweight, powerful and comes in a little black box? The UPA-500 and it's a new five channel amplifier from Emotiva with a price tag under $400. While it may NOT be a perfect amplifier, it comes as close to perfection for a product beyond its price class. The UPA-500 delivers clean, low noise, meaty amplification that will surely bring new life to a whimpering department store A/V receiver. It's honestly rated and has no issues driving low impedance loads while remaining cool in operation even under the most strenuous test conditions on the bench. If you're looking for a step up in sound quality and power on the cheap, I can't think of a better option on the market. Highly recommended!


    Discuss " Emotiva UPA-500 Five Channel Power Amplifier Review" here. Read the article.
    Last edited by gene; 08-09-2012 at 12:20 AM.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to admin For This Useful Post:

    FirstReflection (08-09-2012),Irvrobinson (08-09-2012),its phillip (08-09-2012),j_garcia (08-09-2012),templemaners (08-09-2012)

  3. #2
    avliner's Avatar
    avliner is offline Audioholic Chief avliner is looking for a job at AH
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    769
    Thanks Given
    56
    Thanks Received
    90

    Default

    Hey Gene,

    nice review, as usual

    Would you mind to elaborate a bit on this?

    ...The UPA-500 exhibited very good channel to channel crosstalk performance, much improved over the older and more expensive UPA-7...

    Not that I'm willing to buy the new UPA-500, as I have the UP-7 already and so far, so pretty darn happy with it
    Regards, Chuck
    Hold on Tight to your Dreams - ELO

  4. #3
    j_garcia's Avatar
    j_garcia is offline Seriously, I have no life. j_garcia should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    San Jose, Ca.
    Posts
    21,285
    Thanks Given
    1,664
    Thanks Received
    3,806

    Default

    Can we expect a review of the 200 also or expect the conclusions can be drawn from this review that the 200 will perform similarly with the slightly higher output?
    HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, 3X GR Research A/V-2s, GR A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-83SE, URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100, PS3 Slim120G(500G) Bluejeans Cable
    System Two: Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G), My HT


    Are you sure which side of the glass you are on?

  5. #4
    gene's Avatar
    gene is online now Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,818
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j_garcia View Post
    Can we expect a review of the 200 also or expect the conclusions can be drawn from this review that the 200 will perform similarly with the slightly higher output?
    The 200 and 500 have identical power supplies and power modules. No need to review the 200 and to be honest, I'd suggest to anyone shopping a 200 to just get the 500 for a little more money in case you ever need the extra channels of amplification.
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gene For This Useful Post:

    ahblaza (08-11-2012),j_garcia (08-09-2012)

  7. #5
    gene's Avatar
    gene is online now Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,818
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avliner View Post
    Hey Gene,

    nice review, as usual

    Would you mind to elaborate a bit on this?

    ...The UPA-500 exhibited very good channel to channel crosstalk performance, much improved over the older and more expensive UPA-7...

    Not that I'm willing to buy the new UPA-500, as I have the UP-7 already and so far, so pretty darn happy with it
    If you have a UPA-7 and are happy with it, I'd stick with it. It's still a better amp than the UPA-500. The crosstalk performance on the UPA-7 is still acceptable (50dB @ 20kHz). At least 40dB at 20kHz would be a min requirement and the UPA-7 meets it with 10dB to spare.
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to gene For This Useful Post:

    avliner (08-10-2012)

  9. #6
    j_garcia's Avatar
    j_garcia is offline Seriously, I have no life. j_garcia should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    San Jose, Ca.
    Posts
    21,285
    Thanks Given
    1,664
    Thanks Received
    3,806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gene View Post
    The 200 and 500 have identical power supplies and power modules. No need to review the 200 and to be honest, I'd suggest to anyone shopping a 200 to just get the 500 for a little more money in case you ever need the extra channels of amplification.
    Yeah, I was only looking at it for a pair of surrounds so I don't really anticipate a need the other channels, but I did see that the price difference was quite minimal.
    HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, 3X GR Research A/V-2s, GR A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-83SE, URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100, PS3 Slim120G(500G) Bluejeans Cable
    System Two: Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G), My HT


    Are you sure which side of the glass you are on?

  10. #7
    Steve81's Avatar
    Steve81 is offline Audioholic Samurai Steve81 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanks Received
    987

    Default

    Would something like this be a worthwhile add-on to a mid-range receiver such as the SR6004 mentioned in the review, and also benched by Audioholics? Doesn't seem like the differences add up to a whole lot in my eye, but then again, I'm by no means the last word on these things.

  11. #8
    j_garcia's Avatar
    j_garcia is offline Seriously, I have no life. j_garcia should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    San Jose, Ca.
    Posts
    21,285
    Thanks Given
    1,664
    Thanks Received
    3,806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve81 View Post
    Would something like this be a worthwhile add-on to a mid-range receiver such as the SR6004 mentioned in the review, and also benched by Audioholics? Doesn't seem like the differences add up to a whole lot in my eye, but then again, I'm by no means the last word on these things.
    It depends on what you are after. If the 6004 doesn't struggle now, then no this won't be an upgrade. If it is struggling or you are looking to crank the system more, you might need something with more power than this.
    HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, 3X GR Research A/V-2s, GR A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-83SE, URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100, PS3 Slim120G(500G) Bluejeans Cable
    System Two: Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G), My HT


    Are you sure which side of the glass you are on?

  12. #9
    Steve81's Avatar
    Steve81 is offline Audioholic Samurai Steve81 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanks Received
    987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j_garcia View Post
    It depends on what you are after. If the 6004 doesn't struggle now, then no this won't be an upgrade. If it is struggling or you are looking to crank the system more, you might need something with more power than this.
    IOW, not really

    That's about what I figured. Seems more like something to couple with a UMC-1 to compete with a mid-level AVR than a product meant to really provide a big boost to receivers costly enough to even have preouts.

  13. #10
    KEW
    KEW is offline Audioholic Samurai KEW should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jowjah
    Posts
    2,539
    Thanks Given
    2,259
    Thanks Received
    1,059

    Default

    According to Emotiva's website, the UPA-200 weighs 1.1 lbs more than the UPA-500. Go figure...

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •