Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: 2011 $2000 A/V Receiver Comparison Guide

  1. #21
    gene's Avatar
    gene is online now Supreme Audioholics Overlord gene should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,818
    Thanks Given
    819
    Thanks Received
    2,401

    Default

    Can you explain what the power consumption label on the back of a receiver indicates? Is it not the maximum power that the device can use?
    The last page of this article discusses what the power# on the back of a receiver really means

    Receiver Impedance Switch
    Gene DellaSala
    President, Audioholics
    Pursuing the truth in audio & video...

  2. #22
    smurphy522's Avatar
    smurphy522 is offline Full Audioholic smurphy522 has very reliable input
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    273
    Thanks Given
    11
    Thanks Received
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gene View Post
    wow alot of misinformation here. I suggest reading this article to help clear some things up:

    The All Channels Driven Test
    Gene,
    I was only pointing out that what is specified/claimed in the manuals does not seem to add up. As well as being grossly different from each Manuf. Thanks for pointing me to your "ACD" article which I did read back in October but obviously need to polish up on. I do realize that 90% is the absolute best efficiency you can get coming from a switching D-class amp. However I don't believe that any of these 3 use that technology.

    Thanks I don't want to get off topic.



    "I would have written less but I didn't have the time."

  3. #23
    rushwj is offline Junior Audioholic rushwj is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    97
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1

    Default

    nice little summary there Tom. however, i think there are a few differences b/w the onkyo and the integra worth mentioning as you actually drew attention to some of them - the integra has a powered third zone, and a fourth zone (can't remember if it's powered or not, i thought not, but i could be wrong) and it actually has "hdmi standby 'thru' mode", which you commented on in your lead-in. Additionally, the denon only has audyssey XT, but the integra and onkyo are xt32. but, you are correct, for the most-part, a very similar feature set. personally, i went with the integra for the higher build quality and potential increase in better quality parts (just viewing and handling the binding posts in person was a real difference for me).

    also, i agree that all are very quality receivers and sound fantastic - just different flavors of a similar theme.

  4. #24
    Cruise Missile's Avatar
    Cruise Missile is offline Full Audioholic Cruise Missile should be listened to
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton, Oh.
    Posts
    379
    Thanks Given
    207
    Thanks Received
    132

    Default

    The 4311ci does in fact have xt32. Big deciding factor for us when we bought ours.

  5. #25
    jay21112 is offline Junior Audioholic jay21112 is off the scale
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    93
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    4

    Default Two things needed in AVR Comparison articles

    Hi,
    There were two categories missing from the article that are very important to me, and may possibly be to others as well. I don't think many people have realized this difference yet, but I think as more people upgrade to 11.2 surround sound it will be very important.

    1.) Before, for the most part, everyone placed their speakers the same way with 5.1 or 7.1 systems. With 11.1, there are two big variations that I see.
    11.1 with front and back presence
    11.1 with front presence and front wide.

    Because these two setups require very different speaker placement, someone who setup their theater one way (me), may be unwilling to switch to another setup. I'd like manufacturers and comparison articles to start explaining just what THEIR 11.1 setup means. From what I've been able to surmise, Yamaha is the only one with front and back presence and everyone else does front presence and front wide.

    2.) Now with 9.2 or 11.2 there is another differentiation happening. Again, I believe Yamaha is the only company which separates both sub channels, so you can specify left and right or front and back subs. In truth an AVR with two sub output channels which can't be differentiated should still be called 9.1 or 11.1 in my book, because they aren't separate channels. But I THINK both Onkyo and Denon boast 9.2 or 11.2 even though the two sub outputs are the same channel.

    So I'd love manufacturers and comparison articles to start specifying if 9.2 (or 9.3 or 9.9) are different outputs or are just the same channel.


    I'm just tired of having to wait until a new AVR makes their owners manual available online to see if even though the AVR lists 11.2 surround sound....if that 11.2 surround sound is MY 11.2 surround sound. And even after reading the owners manuals, sometimes I'm still not 100% sure...

  6. #26
    jerrydf is offline Audiophyte jerrydf is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default phono inputs

    I enjoy listening to vinyl records but less and less receivers have a phono input. Do these receivers have phono inputs?

  7. #27
    3db's Avatar
    3db
    3db is offline Audioholic Spartan 3db should be listened to
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    7,326
    Thanks Given
    1,330
    Thanks Received
    1,385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerrydf View Post
    I enjoy listening to vinyl records but less and less receivers have a phono input. Do these receivers have phono inputs?
    They both do. I have an older RX-V1800 with a built in phono stage and it does sound really sweet.

  8. #28
    Cruise Missile's Avatar
    Cruise Missile is offline Full Audioholic Cruise Missile should be listened to
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton, Oh.
    Posts
    379
    Thanks Given
    207
    Thanks Received
    132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jay21112 View Post
    But I THINK both Onkyo and Denon boast 9.2 or 11.2 even though the two sub outputs are the same channel.
    Both the Onkyo and the Denon have Audyssey Multeq XT32. XT32 eq's both subs seperate and then eq's them together to reduce modal problems in room. It's stunningly good at it too. It's the same as the stand alone sub eq from SVS/Audyssey that costs $700 but added to the sub outs.

    That's a far cry from just being a glorified splitter.

    I am failing to grasp why being able to rename an output makes it anything other than the same signal being split into two outputs with independent trims....

    Other than this one point I agree with the rest of what you're saying.

  9. #29
    highfigh's Avatar
    highfigh is offline Audioholic Spartan highfigh should be listened to
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee area
    Posts
    6,263
    Thanks Given
    16
    Thanks Received
    1,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smurphy522 View Post
    That may be important to many in this price/feature category. I can confirm that having to run additional analog cables (for those sources that have them) is
    not all that bad but labeling and getting them figured out is a pain for my second zone.

    Does anyone know if the YPAO does subwoofer calibration? There is very little information, even from Yamaha on this technology.
    Labeling and bundling cables is easy if you connect one source at a time.

    AFAIK, Audussey XT/XT32 and Pro are the only ones that correct for subwoofers.
    Never eat anything that squirts out of a machine.

  10. #30
    jay21112 is offline Junior Audioholic jay21112 is off the scale
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    93
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cruise Missile View Post
    Both the Onkyo and the Denon have Audyssey Multeq XT32. XT32 eq's both subs seperate and then eq's them together to reduce modal problems in room. It's stunningly good at it too. It's the same as the stand alone sub eq from SVS/Audyssey that costs $700 but added to the sub outs.

    That's a far cry from just being a glorified splitter.

    I am failing to grasp why being able to rename an output makes it anything other than the same signal being split into two outputs with independent trims....

    Other than this one point I agree with the rest of what you're saying.

    To my knowledge the Yamaha lets you distinguish Front and Rear or Left and Right subs. It doesn't just rename the output, it changes the LFE signal sent to that output. So that the LFE signal from the left speakers comes out the left sub and the LFE signal from the right speakers comes out the right sub, or vice versa for front and back.

    Not sure how much actual difference it makes, but to me that's true 9.2 or 11.2.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •